| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hano
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 75
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:39 am Post subject: Statistics 100/200 |
 |
|
Some statistics concerning the 100 and 200 (times sub 10 / 20, averages of best 10 times) needed some updates after Berlin(o). Here is the overview for the 100m:
Times sub 10
1 Asafa Powell 54
2 Maurice Greene 51
3 Ato Boldon 28
4 Frank Fredericks 27
5 Tyson Gay 17
6 Usain Bolt 15
7 Donovan Bailey 15
8 Carl Lewis 15
9 Justin Gatlin 11
10 Dennis Mitchell 11
Times sub 9.90
1 Asafa Powell 26
2 Usain Bolt 12
3 Maurice Greene 10
4 Tyson Gay 9
5 Ato Boldon 8
6 Frank Fredericks 3
7 Justin Gatlin 3
8 Shawn Crawford 3
9 Leroy Burrell 2
10 Bruny Surin 2
Average top 10
1 Usain Bolt 9.770
2 Asafa Powell 9.779
3 Tyson Gay 9.831
4 Maurice Greene 9.848
5 Ato Boldon 9.876
6 Frank Fredericks 9.910
7 Donovan Bailey 9.925
8 Justin Gatlin 9.935
9 Carl Lewis 9.936
10 Leroy Burrell 9.936 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hano
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 75
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
And for the 200m:
Times sub 20
1 Frank Fredericks 25
2 Michael Johnson 23
3 Usain Bolt 16
4 Wallace Spearmon 16
5 Tyson Gay 12
6 Carl Lewis 10
7 Ato Boldon 8
8 Shawn Crawford 8
9 Michael Marsh 5
10 Maurice Greene 5
Average top 10
1 Usain Bolt 19.649
2 Michael Johnson 19.745
3 Tyson Gay 19.764
4 Wallace Spearmon 19.851
5 Frank Fredericks 19.862
6 Carl Lewis 19.875
7 Ato Boldon 19.895
8 Shawn Crawford 19.919
9 Michael Marsh 19.963
10 Maurice Greene 19.978
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fielding Melish
Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 55
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greene actually has 52 lifetime wind-legal automatic timing sub-10.00s
Breakdown per year as follows:
1997 = 8
1998 = 8
1999 = 9
2000 = 6
2001 = 7
2002 = 5
2003 = 1
2004 = 8
That adds up to 52. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hano
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 75
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
There has been a debate before whether Greene has 51, 52 or 53 sub 10s. I have excluded quarter finals in Edmonton and rolling start in Berlin 98 (9.94).
Last edited by Hano on Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:03 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
doctor sprint
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 26
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TrainerPhil
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Location: A step ahead of you !
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| doctor sprint wrote: | | Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... |
The numbers show that Ato dropped some pretty special times too. But he doesn't have a gold to show for his efforts either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ned Ryerson
Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Posts: 186
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TrainerPhil wrote: | | doctor sprint wrote: | | Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... |
The numbers show that Ato dropped some pretty special times too. But he doesn't have a gold to show for his efforts either. |
Then who won the 200m at the 1997 World Championships? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Daisy
Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 9153
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| doctor sprint wrote: | | Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... |
It's already pretty cruel at 54. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hano
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 75
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those who might wonder if 2009 was the best sub-10 year ever. It was not, only 2008 was better though. Here is an overview of all sub-10s for every year.
2009 41
2008 53
2007 18
2006 24
2005 16
2004 33
2003 9
2002 16
2001 16
2000 14
1999 26
1998 33
1997 38
1996 24
1995 5
1994 16
1993 8
1992 6
1991 13
1990 2
1989 2
1988 9
1987 1
1986 0
1985 1
1984 4
1983 3
1982 0
1981 0
1980 0
1979 0
1978 0
1977 1
1976 0
1975 0
1974 0
1973 0
1972 0
1971 0
1970 0
1969 0
1968 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frans Rutten
Joined: 05 Sep 2008
Posts: 172
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hano wrote: | For those who might wonder if 2009 was the best sub-10 year ever. It was not, only 2008 was better though. Here is an overview of all sub-10s for every year.
2009 41
2008 53
2007 18
2006 24
2005 16
2004 33
2003 9
2002 16
2001 16
2000 14
1999 26
1998 33
1997 38
1996 24
1995 5
1994 16
1993 8
1992 6
1991 13
1990 2
1989 2
1988 9
1987 1
1986 0
1985 1
1984 4
1983 3
1982 0
1981 0
1980 0
1979 0
1978 0
1977 1
1976 0
1975 0
1974 0
1973 0
1972 0
1971 0
1970 0
1969 0
1968 1 |
The point however, I speak for myself, is that ever more the sub 10s barrier is becoming abundant, just like counting sub 4-minute miles, no. 
But I don't object anyone to make what-ever statistics they like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
