Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??


This Forum was created to divert traffic from Current Events at the height of the BALCO scandal. It comes and goes as "needed"; it's back to being locked.

Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:44 am

She says she doesn't take any kind of supplement whatsoever. No special vitamins, energy boosters, fish oils etc. She doesn't even take the legal allowable kinds in fair that they may be tainted. She says she see thinks very black and white with no shade of grey in between. I believe this may have def cost her as she was operating on pure talent alone which not too many people are. I personally use creatine.zma,whey protein, high potency multivitamin(super b complex),fish oil and couldnt imagine my workouts without them. I cant imagine going up against the best of the world and not even trying to get a boost to at least have a shot against some of these chemical cyborgs. I admire her integrity but playing Mother Theresa sure hasnt helped her.
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby ChuiTai » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:51 am

I gather she only contemplated those elements that came in a bottle, can and/or package of some sort.
ChuiTai
 
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:56 am

ChuiTai wrote:I gather she only contemplated those elements that came in a bottle, can and/or package of some sort.



Which would have left her with what besides food?
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby bambam » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:21 am

run4urlyfe wrote:
ChuiTai wrote:I gather she only contemplated those elements that came in a bottle, can and/or package of some sort.



Which would have left her with what besides food?


As the cyclists call it - riding "panagua" - bread and water only - its in Tyler Hamilton's book
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby TrakFan » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:47 am

So, why is there a thread in the drug cheat forum with Lauryn Williams' name in the title?
TrakFan
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:51 am

TrakFan wrote:So, why is there a thread in the drug cheat forum with Lauryn Williams' name in the title?



I suppose it could be put in the general current events thread but i have had many of my threads thrown into this forum and deleted as well. There is alot of room for this thread to go left and better it is in this forum before it does.
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby eldanielfire » Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:11 am

run4urlyfe wrote:She says she doesn't take any kind of supplement whatsoever. No special vitamins, energy boosters, fish oils etc. She doesn't even take the legal allowable kinds in fair that they may be tainted. She says she see thinks very black and white with no shade of grey in between.


I always likely WIlliams but Usain Bolt and Sally Pearson don't touch supplements and they do just fine. There is some debate to the overall gain from Supplements. The body doesn't absorb them as well as nutrients in their natural form and may not use them as effectively and may compensate for them. There is a definite placebo effect involved as well.
eldanielfire
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:07 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:38 am

eldanielfire wrote:
run4urlyfe wrote:She says she doesn't take any kind of supplement whatsoever. No special vitamins, energy boosters, fish oils etc. She doesn't even take the legal allowable kinds in fair that they may be tainted. She says she see thinks very black and white with no shade of grey in between.


I always likely WIlliams but Usain Bolt and Sally Pearson don't touch supplements and they do just fine. There is some debate to the overall gain from Supplements. The body doesn't absorb them as well as nutrients in their natural form and may not use them as effectively and may compensate for them. There is a definite placebo effect involved as well.


From my personal experience certain supplements should always be in every athletes handy bag. Creatine for me is a wonder drug and I would bet that substance alone would top the majority of all these so called stimulants(especially for sprinters). ZMA's ability to aid in recovery and mild to moderate increase in test levels are also helpful. I am not sure what people mean when they say supplements because there are probably hundreds out there .However there are some that i believe are vital and may make help a sprinter possibly drop a hundredth here a tenth there especially after reaching a mature trainng age.
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby Vielleicht » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:13 pm

I think most of the supplements out there have only anecdotal benefits for us mortals, can't imagine how important they ought to be for elite athletes.
Vielleicht
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:11 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby ATK » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:22 pm

I'm slightly confused at this topic. Shouldn't she be applauded for this? She was a grade A world beater for some time...
ATK
 
Posts: 3808
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby betterthanb4 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:42 pm

Lauryn's entire interview on supplements, her career etc

http://www.mcmillanspeed.com/2013/07/a- ... s.html?m=1
betterthanb4
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby Daisy » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:49 pm

run4urlyfe wrote:ZMA's ability to aid in recovery and mild to moderate increase in test levels are also helpful.

Of course, too much zinc can then lead to a deficiency in copper, since they compete for the same transporter to get into our system. Copper is one of the key minerals required for mitochondria and the production of energy. So a balanced diet is the real key. And is there any real evidence that ZMA work beyond placebo? It certainly comes in a nice package.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby Swoosher » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:14 pm

When discussing what works and doesn't - here is a useful link

http://www.ausport.gov.au/ais/nutrition ... ation_test

From the Austrlian Insititue of Sport and details what "supplements" their athletes can and can't take and why. Lead by some of the worlds experts in nutirtion etc etc with a large amount of research behind it.

Creatine in the A group - meaning it can be provided and has scientific evidence that it can work. ZMA in the C category with "no meaningful evidence" that it works.
Swoosher
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:48 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby gh » Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:27 pm

run4urlyfe wrote:...
From my personal experience certain supplements should always be in every athletes handy bag. ...



Don't take this personally, but this is one of the root causes of this whole positiive-test thingie. Your "personal experience" doesn't count for shit. And people who think it does do stupid things.
gh
 
Posts: 46335
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:36 am

Vielleicht wrote:I think most of the supplements out there have only anecdotal benefits for us mortals, can't imagine how important they ought to be for elite athletes.



Well you cant lump every supplement together. Some are nothing more than snake oil while some might be just a couple notches under the effects of steroids. Like I said before for me creatines is really effective. I document all my lifts and times and notice that when i am on creatine I always approach pbs. It is way more than anecdotal. The thing with creatine and probably alot of other supplements is you will only see the difference when pushing yourself to the limit and you need to keep very detailed records. For example if your bench press max is 300 and you have been stuck there for a while creatine might be able to help you get to around 310-315 in about two to three weeks. That may not sound like a big increase but if you have been at 300 for about a year or so any increase is appreciated. As for ZMA i have noticed alot deeper sleep and it is non habit forming so that in itself makes it beneficial. I cant vouch for whether it really increases testosterone or not but I seem to keep more muscle mass on when using it than without. I cant vouch for all the other supplements but I am sure a good amount of them have some kind of benefit beyond being a placebo or athletes would be able to see through it by now.
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:40 am

ATK wrote:I'm slightly confused at this topic. Shouldn't she be applauded for this? She was a grade A world beater for some time...


Well i am certainly not attacking her. Just wondering if she sold herself to short being that careful. I am pretty sure even athletes like Felix and Richards Ross take some sort of supplements to help them thru training. Personally unless you are eating all organic food from the best growers I think you would not be getting all you need in your diet as an athlete training as strenously as an elite sprinter.
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby TN1965 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:15 am

Swoosher wrote:When discussing what works and doesn't - here is a useful link

http://www.ausport.gov.au/ais/nutrition ... ation_test

From the Austrlian Insititue of Sport and details what "supplements" their athletes can and can't take and why. Lead by some of the worlds experts in nutirtion etc etc with a large amount of research behind it.

Creatine in the A group - meaning it can be provided and has scientific evidence that it can work. ZMA in the C category with "no meaningful evidence" that it works.


If "sports drink" is classified as a supplement, then even I take them. And I cannot imagine any serious athlete hydrating with water only.
TN1965
 
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:38 pm

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby Pego » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:43 am

run4urlyfe wrote:It is way more than anecdotal.


No, it is not. It would be scientific if a sample group used creatine under your protocol, while an identical group used placebo under the same protocol. None of them would know what they took until a code was broken. Such study would be scientific and if independently confirmed more than once, it could become accepted as evidential. Your story, no matter how well documented remains just that, your story.
Pego
 
Posts: 10203
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Re: Has Lauryn Williams played it too safe??

Postby run4urlyfe » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:00 am

Pego wrote:
run4urlyfe wrote:It is way more than anecdotal.


No, it is not. It would be scientific if a sample group used creatine under your protocol, while an identical group used placebo under the same protocol. None of them would know what they took until a code was broken. Such study would be scientific and if independently confirmed more than once, it could become accepted as evidential. Your story, no matter how well documented remains just that, your story.



I made a mistake when i said way more than anecdotal. I meant way more than a Placebo. I know the increases are not all in my head because as the sky is blue when i take creatine my lifts go up I have been cycling on and off more over 5 years now and there has never been a time when my lifts
had not increased. Mental tricks and placebos will only work some of the time but not time after time. There are some people who are classic non responders(somewhat rare) but for the vast majority i am sure they would experience the same effect.

Zinc on its own is proven to give a subtle increase in testosterone so I dont see how ZMA could be any worse plus the added benefits of sleep dont hurt either.
run4urlyfe
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:37 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests