Secretariat


Forum devoted to track & field items of an historical nature.

Re: Secretariat

Postby eldrick » Thu May 12, 2005 11:00 pm

>
On a
>"souped up" track (rolled, packed down, made hard), all of the
>horses that
>showed speed died, setting it up for the closers. The winner had
>a dream run
>through.

No kidding ...........<


the winner ran 2'02 ?

under best track conditions possible

shows the merit of secretariat's 1'59.4


may i also add that when he won the preakness, the main timing system broke down & he was credited with what seemed a wrong back-up time

HT taken at the time showed he had run significantly faster than the course record, but the officials wouldn't accept it

he was in fact robbed of holding the time records for all 3 triple crown races

i'll try & dig up that story ( but someone could also double-check)
eldrick
 
Posts: 14147
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: 19th hole st andrews

Re: Secretariat

Postby DrJay » Fri May 13, 2005 9:27 am

I think the hand time was still a bit slower than the Preakness record, saw that on a site I found last week. I'll try to find it again.

Here it is:

http://www.chef-de-race.com/articles/fatigue.htm

At 5:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, in Maryland on a Saturday in May, a chestnut colt of imposing physical and historical stature broke from the gate and leisurely settled in behind the other horses racing to the clubhouse turn. Within a few seconds, the colt would initiate a move of such spectacular proportions that he would circle the entire field and take command entering the backstretch, to be hand-ridden the rest of the way to an overwhelming victory. In one of racing’s most memorable displays of power and grace, Secretariat had won the second leg of the Triple Crown on his march toward immortality. A malfunctioning teletimer clicked off 1:55 for the mile and three—sixteenths, one second slower than Canonero II’s mark set two years earlier. An immediate controversy arose as two Daily Racing Form clockers had separately timed the race one and three-fifths seconds faster. A debate followed, and evidence was presented in an attempt to resolve the dispute. Two days after the race it was learned that the official track clocker had timed the race manually, catching Secretariat under the wire in 1:54.2, still over the track mark. Pimlico officials compromised and lowered the time to that recorded by the track clocker. To this day, the result chart of the race lists the track time as official but includes, parenthetically, the faster Daily Racing Form time.
Last edited by DrJay on Fri May 13, 2005 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
DrJay
 
Posts: 5483
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Woodland Park, CO

Re: Secretariat

Postby bambam » Fri May 13, 2005 12:31 pm

The rest of that article Dr. Jay referenced is pretty cool and convincing evidence that Secretariat was at least capable of the record-breaking Preakness time.
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Secretariat

Postby mrbowie » Fri May 13, 2005 2:23 pm

Final time in horse racing is not as important as it is in track, especially overseas.

In horse racing, track conditions make for records, not necessarily the horses.
mrbowie
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Lexington, Kentucky

Re: Secretariat

Postby eldrick » Fri May 13, 2005 3:48 pm

>Final time in horse racing is not as important as it is in track, especially
>overseas.

In horse racing, track conditions make for records, not
>necessarily the horses.<


flat,wide-ish turn tracks under same ground conditions,with the horse running "flat-out" "gun-to-tape", the estimates are valid


do those conditions apply to all the '73 races ?
Last edited by eldrick on Fri May 13, 2005 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
eldrick
 
Posts: 14147
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: 19th hole st andrews

Re: Secretariat

Postby tandfman » Wed May 01, 2013 10:54 am

mrbowie wrote:It is 98 percent horse and 2 percent rider.

So maybe we don't need riders at all?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 22244.html
tandfman
 
Posts: 15041
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Secretariat

Postby Marlow » Wed May 01, 2013 11:14 am

tandfman wrote:
mrbowie wrote:It is 98 percent horse and 2 percent rider.

So maybe we don't need riders at all?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 22244.html

60 minutes did a profile on this lady. Certainly opened my eyes to the value of a great jockey over a good jockey.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosie_Napravnik
Marlow
 
Posts: 21080
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: Secretariat

Postby DrJay » Wed May 01, 2013 1:58 pm

This coming Sunday is the 40th anniversary of Secretariat's Derby win.
DrJay
 
Posts: 5483
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Woodland Park, CO

Re: Secretariat

Postby bambam » Wed May 01, 2013 4:31 pm

DrJay wrote:This coming Sunday is the 40th anniversary of Secretariat's Derby win.


Secretariat's Belmont win convinced me he was almost a different life form.

Reading something the other day, though, about Ruffian, the filly who died in the match race against Foolish Pleasure (or was put down after the race). The trainer of Secretariat, Lucien Laurin, actually said of her that she might have been better than Secretariat. Now that's high praise.
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Secretariat

Postby runforlife » Thu May 02, 2013 3:30 pm

eldrick wrote:his belmont record does a little more than just "still stand"

it is still the WR for 1 1/2 miles on dirt !!!


Think what he could have done on an all weather track!!
runforlife
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Drake Relays: finish line - row 1

Re: Secretariat

Postby bambam » Thu May 02, 2013 6:39 pm

runforlife wrote:
eldrick wrote:his belmont record does a little more than just "still stand"

it is still the WR for 1 1/2 miles on dirt !!!


Think what he could have done on an all weather track!!


But could he have beaten Bob Hayes???
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Secretariat

Postby nunusguy » Sat May 04, 2013 9:45 am

SQUACKEE wrote:no body beats secretariat, not even spiderman on board seabiscuit.
when there is another horse of this talent we will know it.

But Secretariat was indeed beaten, atleast once I believe ?
nunusguy
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:29 am
Location: Houston

Re: Secretariat

Postby kuha » Sat May 04, 2013 9:55 am

The 73 Belmont remains, by far, my favorite and most riveting non-track sporting event ever. Stunning and transcendent.
kuha
 
Posts: 9016
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Re: Secretariat

Postby bambam » Sat May 04, 2013 10:08 am

nunusguy wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:no body beats secretariat, not even spiderman on board seabiscuit.
when there is another horse of this talent we will know it.

But Secretariat was indeed beaten, atleast once I believe ?


Actually, I think he had 4 losses in his career. He lost the Wood Memorial, shortly before the Derby, a big Derby-prep race, but it turned out he had an infected tooth and was off his game a bit and hadn't eaten well that week.
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Secretariat

Postby user4 » Sat May 04, 2013 10:43 am

wynton wrote:Thanks for the mention of horse racing. Growing up near Louisville, I've had a soft spot for these athletes all my life. I've seen Secretariat's Belmont performance countless times, and it always gives me chills. What an athlete! I would also echo the sentiments for Sham. While watching these old replays, I've often remarked, "Poor Sham"--he's Joe Frazier to Secretariat's Ali.


Except that Frazier beat Ali fair n square and did it at a lighter weight and 5 inches shorter than Ali, ...As great as Sham was did he ever beat an uninjured Secretariat ?
user4
 
Posts: 1434
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:05 pm

Re: Secretariat

Postby JumboElliott » Tue May 07, 2013 3:34 am

I believe that Secretariat and Sham had the same damsire.
JumboElliott
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:46 am

Re: Secretariat

Postby DrJay » Tue May 07, 2013 6:56 pm

JumboElliott wrote:I believe that Secretariat and Sham had the same damsire.


Good call. It was Princequillo.

http://www.pedigreequery.com/secretariat

http://www.pedigreequery.com/sham

OK, how'd they come up with "Miss Disco" for Bold Ruler's dam's name back in 1944? I mean, Barry, Robin, and Maurice Gibb weren't even born until 1946 and 1949.
DrJay
 
Posts: 5483
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Woodland Park, CO

Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests