http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 56816.html
A Very Bad Morning For LanceRe: A Very Bad Morning For LanceMeanwhile, Jason Gay of the Wall Street Journal has interviewed the new winner of those 7 Tours de France.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 56816.html
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceHere is the top 15 of the final GC classification of the 2000 Tour de France:
1.Lance Armstrong (US Postal): 92hr 33min 8sec USADA Report 2.Jan Ullrich (Telekom) @ 6min 2sec Operacion Puerto 3.Joseba Beloki (Festina) @ 10min 4sec Operacion Puerto 4.Christophe Moreau (Festina) @ 10min 34sec Festina Affair 5.Roberto Heras (Kelme) @ 11min 50sec Tested positive & suspended 6.Richard Virenque (Polti)@ 13min 26sec Festina Affair 7.Santiago Botero (Kelme)@ 14min 18sec Kelme Scandal 8.Fernando Escartin (Kelme)@ 17min 21sec Kelme Scandal 9.Francisco Mancebo (Banesto)@ 18min 9sec Tested positive & suspended 10.Daniele Nardello (Mapei)@ 18min 25sec T-Mobile Scandal 11.Manuel Beltrán (Mapei)@ 21min 11sec Tested positive & suspended 12.Pascal Hervé (Polti)@ 23min 13sec Tested positive, Festina Affair 13.Javier Ochoa (Kelme)@ 25min Kelme Scandal 14.Felix Garcia-Casas (Festina)@ 32min 4sec Festina Affair 15.Alexandre Vinokourov (Telekom) @ 32min 26sec Tested positive & suspended, T-Mobile scandal
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceExactly. By the way, I suspect the Tour on tv is dead very soon. I can't believe NBC wants to get involved with that anymore. And American cycling will soon be a thing of the past. I am sure LeMond is happy.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
You'd really have to think so. The real story here isn't or at least shouldn't be Armstrong--it's what looks to be a total meltdown of credibility in the event itself. Which WAS the key issue all along. Maybe we'll now see the Tour of Nebraska on TV.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceI've probably related this bit before, but i stopped in Paris on the way to Barcelona in '92. Wandered over from my hotel to the Champs d'Elysses to find a nice little sidewalk cafe for a morning beverage and was most distressed to find everywhere cordoned off and having to take very long walk around. oh, it was tour de france finish day!
At any rate, after the race and the guys were parading up and down the road I was fairly close to them and the first thing that struck me was that I hadn't seen faces that drawn, with eyeballs that sunken in the head since the Bataan Death March. I was stunned at how wasted they all looked. I was even more stunned when the next weekend I picked up a copy of L'Équipe in Barcelona and noticed that everybody was up and hammering again at the tour-de-something-else. I decided then and there that either these guys were all supermen, or......
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Sorry, but that is pretty lame!
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceNow the Boston and New York Marathons are jumping in on the fun.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ear ... sults-too/
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
I doubt it, although the amount that they will have to pay will likely drop. Jazz, what is your opinion as the closest observer of the sport on this board?
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceHow long before Pat McQuaid is gone. Many calling for his withdrawal. This from Mr. Lemond tonight.
https://www.facebook.com/greglemond?ref=ts&fref=ts
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Now that's getting a little absurd. Maybe next they'll expunge his name from all print and digital media for the last 20 years, like in Orwell's 1984.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
All the boobs in authority trying to prove who is the most righteous. Puritans Unite!
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceEddie Merckx weighs in.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/merckx- ... -armstrong Is he for real or is he doing his best Inspector Renault impression?
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Shocked, shocked!! Yea, pretty moronic. All Armstrong's fault. The Tour is now the equivalent of a Child's Birthday Party only dirtied by LA.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Anybody?
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
POE = EPO, the nickname the cyclists used for it, or Edgar
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Although Merckx is undeniably the greatest cyclist ever, he did get popped for doping 2-3 times during his career, even in the era in which there was very little testing.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceTerrific stuff on Rock Center tonight. Emma O'Reilly was particularly compelling.
It was also interesting to watch Andreu call interviewer Harry Smith onto the carpet as one of Armstrong's media sycophants. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500461_162- ... ColumnArea Credit to Smith and NBC for not cutting those comments from the piece.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
Wrong answer, Dookie!
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LancePerhaps my all-time favorite movie. So many great lines, too many to repeat here !
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceThanks to Dr. Jay for pointing out the obvious and the Purity Of Essence of it all.
And I agree with the dukester, it is a great movie.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LancePOE = Purity Of Essence.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceJust stumbled upon the use of "to Live Strong" as a synonym for "to use PEDs"; interesting to see if that's gonna catch on ...
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
It turns out that Mr. Armstrong has salted away a good amount of money and may be able to fend off bankruptcy in spite of these actual and potential claims against him. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/27/your- ... arges.html
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
I have read other reports that put his net worth at about $25,000,000 or so. Who knows how accurate this information is. He probably will remain rich. But, I think he is still open to lawsuits from the likes of Emma O'Reilly, Betsy Andreu, and Greg Lemond (should they think about going that route) and others he has bullied and vilified in press, for defamation of character, etc. He also may be subject to punitive damages as well from some of these lawsuits, and who knows how much (if they happen) they might be.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceOk, NOW it's time to start worrying about the Apocalypse being upon us...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/05/sport ... ml?hp&_r=0 Would have loved to be a fly on the wall at that Tygart/Armstrong sit-down
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceThe Onion ran this story more than 2 years ago:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/lance- ... but,17973/ Of course, it was a spoof at the time.
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lancefrom his column this morning, Scott Ostler's "Knucklehead Of The Week"
<<Knucklehead of the week: Lance Armstrong Reportedly, Armstrong is considering a confession of his doping sins. What, he's weary of the deception? He's guilt-stricken for all that cheating? He wants to be a role model for contrition and redemption? Nah. Lance wants to get cleared so he can return to competitive sports. He wants to wipe away years of selfish cheating with a self-serving apology. It will have to be a hell of an apology to make folks forget the self-righteous pit bull, denouncing and threatening doubters and accusers. Proposed: a televised debate between Juicer Pit Bull Lance and Seen-the-Light Lance.>> Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/sports/ostler/art ... z2HDgoy700
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
This must be a stupid question, but . . . why would they let him compete again?! Isn't a life-time ban the suitable punishment for all the cheating and lying? Would not triathlon (presumably his next option) make him unwelcome also?
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceUSADA head Travis Tygart on Showtime's 60 Minutes Sports tomorrow night, talking about Armstrong and his intimidation tactics - including death threats
Preview - http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-5 ... ong-probe/
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceLA will do a 1.5 hour interview with Oprah on the 17th. 9-10:30 PM on the OWN Network.
Is this confession time or more lies a la Marion Jones?
Re: A Very Bad Morning For Lance
The British bookies are already taking bets on what he's going to say. This is from a Tweet I just saw:
Re: A Very Bad Morning For LanceAnother Twitter contributor speculates on the Oprah/Lance intervew:
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 9 guests |