Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2013


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:15 am

So - with LaCaze seemingly confirmed - the best news from this story:

http://www.theage.com.au/olympics/athle ... 20gqu.html

seems to be:

Coates has welcomed the AA change of heart saying: “We are absolutely delighted that Athletics Australia have reconsidered. We always want to nurture young talent and we think Gen is someone with a great future in our sport and we welcome her on the team for London and beyond that look forward to seeing her in Rio".

The AOC accepts that an athlete who records an A-standard performance after June 22 and before the international deadline of July 7 would have a strong argument on appeal to be allowed onto the team and they would still welcome any athlete in that circumstance onto the team.

Surely this means that future AA selection criteria will allow for (at least) A qualifiers throughout the entire IAAF period.

And what's so hard about that really? Why can't AA just announce an auto team around nationals/trials plus a B shadow squad and then adjust the teams as necessary through the year.

The main team is announced to allow for uniform/credentials/whatever double-checks 6 weeks prior to Games. But then a couple of athletes who could possibly make an A (or an up and coming B in soft events) in the last few days can still be added (with IOC agreeing to automatically accept at least A qualifiers).
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:44 pm

It's great to see sense prevail.

Returning to the team itself I'm rapt to see 3 male discus hurlers. First time at non-home Games?
AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby GMH454 » Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:49 pm

I like Scott but think he was lucky with the wind, but think Wrucky may surprise his way into the final ... and hope Benn is healthy..

it is a testament to some great coaching and support ..... from a few well respected sourses
Last edited by GMH454 on Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
GMH454
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sat Jun 16, 2012 7:42 pm

LaCaze chops a second off her 1500m PB with a 4-12.48 1500m at Indy.

Lapierre wins Texas LJ in 8.08 (+0.5) but still needs another 12cm for an Olympic berth.

And some decent (inc PB) 10k road runs in Lonny this morning by most of our London marathoners.
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby El Toro » Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:02 pm

GMH454 wrote:I like Scott but think he was lucky with the wind, but think Wrucky may surprise his way into teh final ... and hope Benn is healthy..


If Scott has been lucky with the wind, then that makes up for all the times he has been unlucky. I agree Wruck might do something impressive because he has proven his competitive ability, but will need to PB to come close to a medal.

Ben's health, according to story in the SMH on Monday, is not ideal. He missed the FBK Games and Rome DL due to a back problem. This puts his 62m in NY in context. He apparently cannot take anti-inflammatories due suffering from congenital hepatic fribrosis - bummer for a heavy lifting thrower. :(

Further to LaCaze's opportunity to use London as a learning experience for Rio,
Harradine says wrote:Beijing wasn't the most memorable experence in terms of performance, but the experience from being there and getting used to the spectacle is something I have learned going to London. It helps knowing what to expect. How to stick to your own routine and keep to your plan is the hardest thing. It is like being at Disneyland for adults. It is the spectacle of most people's lives, the Olympics. But it one thing to compete at the Olympics and one thing to do well at the Olympics There is a fair distance between the two mindsets.


TFN picked up a shortened version of the article published online at the WAToday website. Full version at at A throwaway approach hides fierce will to win
El Toro
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby jackbean » Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:42 pm

Vault-emort wrote:The mission objective of AA should be to ensure maximum representation in all events at all international competitions.


Yeah, because in this global economy everyone has money to splash around. And send everyone! No standards to be an Olympian. Just run third at nationals in a weak athletics nation 7 seconds off the pace, and off you go. Please. :roll:
jackbean
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:45 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby typpo » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:25 pm

I agree with Vault-emort - AA should be trying to pick the biggest squad possible. After all, it's the biggest meet in four years and since we're all paying for it in one way or another, we may as well have a decent athlete or two to cheer on. To AA's credit, I believe they've actually tried to do this. I just think they made the wrong call on LaCaze and were subsequently forced into an embarrassing backdown. I'm comfortable with the team they've picked apart from that and I'm just as comfortable with the non-selection of borderline athletes like Lapierre, Manou, Ross (in the individual 100 that is) without an A. On current form, LaCaze is at least capable of making the semis in London, irrespective of how she ran at nationals a couple of months ago.
typpo
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:04 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:30 pm

jackbean wrote:No standards to be an Olympian. Just run third at nationals in a weak athletics nation 7 seconds off the pace, and off you go. Please. :roll:

Well, that's a fair jump....

Maximum Representation means A qualifiers (3 if possible) in each event and - if we do not have an A - then B standards can still be considered. Nothing at all about sending athletes who have not achieved the same international standards as every other entrant . :roll:
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:09 pm

AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby typpo » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:17 pm

AA has now extended the qualification window from June 22 to July 7
typpo
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:04 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:10 pm

From the AA site, here is the list of 'shadow' athletes who have nominated for an OG spot, subject to an 'A' qualifier before the cut-off date.

I know 'hope springs eternal' but some of these names have got to be kidding - I mean plenty of them haven't been that close to a B...

Alex Beck
Scott Crowe
Robert Crowther
Matt Davies
Anthony Di Quinzio
Greg Eyears
Liam Gander
Jake Hammond
Fabrice Lapierre
Jackson Mallory
Matthew Outzen
Ian Rayson
Lachlan Renshaw
Aaron Rouge-Serret
Alexander Rowe
Sean Wroe

Crystal Attenborough
Monica Brennan
Lisa Corrigan
Jody Henry
Tanya Holliday
Tamsyn Manou
Victoria Mitchell
Larissa Pasternatsky
Kerrie Perkins
Caitlin Pincott
Anneliese Rubie
Caitlin Sargent
Theodora Spathis
Brooke Stratton
Lara Tamsett
Laura Whaler
Ashleigh Whittaker
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:38 pm

Why isn't Vault-emort among the names? 8-)
AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:33 am

With my PB of something like 11.11m for the triple at age 12, I was tempted to apply for the 4xtotally ridiculous relay

hang on - thanks 2 a social media campaign, I'm IN! :P
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby norunner » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:08 am

If any Aussies are interested: There is a big junior meeting today in Mannheim / Germany with many australian juniors (and some seniors) competing and there is even a livestream with liveresults here: http://www.leichtathletik.tv/2012/Sonst ... la12/1.htm .
norunner
 
Posts: 1288
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:16 am

And very importantly a few of the seniors are in Nivelle for a meet (Pearson, Breen, Boden, Manou, Renshaw...):

http://www.eap-circuit.org/article.php3?id_article=760
AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:28 am

Aussies doing well so far in Mannheim.

Kim Mickle JAV 64.12m PB
Nick Hough 110H 13.38 NJR (in heat)
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:08 pm

From Nivelle:
W100m
1.Pearson 11.20 (-1.2)
2.Breen 11.55

w800m
1. Manou 2.03.65

w100mH
1.Pearson 12.55

w400mH
1. Boden 57.07

M400m
3. Offereins 46.59

M800
2. Renshaw 1.46.45

m3000
1. Batt 7.59.92

M400mH
1. Cole 50.60
AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Speedster » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:17 pm

AS wrote:From Nivelle:
W100m
1.Pearson 11.20 (-1.2)
2.Breen 11.55


Sally's run corrects to 11.11, which would break MGT's 11.12A AR. I hope she gets a chance to run another 10m soon to see if she can get. This makes her the fastest sprint hurdler in the world, ahead of Phylicia George who has run 11.25 this year.
Speedster
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: London

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Athleticsimaging » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:51 am

Speedster wrote:Sally's run corrects to 11.11, which would break MGT's 11.12A AR.


I think the way her luck is going in the 100m, she'll finish her career with a PB of 11.13 -10.5m/s :?
Athleticsimaging
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:58 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby t_monk » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:26 am

Athleticsimaging wrote:
Speedster wrote:Sally's run corrects to 11.11, which would break MGT's 11.12A AR.


I think the way her luck is going in the 100m, she'll finish her career with a PB of 11.13 -10.5m/s :?


Sad part.... I agree >_<
t_monk
 
Posts: 4338
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:03 pm
Location: New Haven, CT + Kgn, JA

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Speedster » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:11 am

t_monk wrote:
Athleticsimaging wrote:
Speedster wrote:Sally's run corrects to 11.11, which would break MGT's 11.12A AR.


I think the way her luck is going in the 100m, she'll finish her career with a PB of 11.13 -10.5m/s :?


Sad part.... I agree >_<


11.13 would be a low-alt AR! But I hope that the wind gods allow Sally a chance to break it fair and square one day. Maybe one season she will focus on the sprints exclusively and get into the 10s!
Speedster
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: London

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:28 pm

Steve Hooker's city-square comp in Köln yesterday wasn't anything flash. Conditions didn't appear to be great (and the comp was won at only 5.40m) but still..

Hooker 5.00 xxo 5.20 xxx

Mitch Watt pulled out of LJ due to the weather.
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:36 pm

Speedster wrote:11.13 would be a low-alt AR!

Well she does hold the low-alt AR already!

PROGRESSION
11.65 Marjorie Jackson (Nelson) 13 Sep 31 1f Helsinki 22 Jul 52
11.58 Marilyn Black 20 May 44 1h6 Tokyo 14 Oct 64
11.4e Marilyn Black (Vassella) 20 May 44 1h2 Tokyo 15 Oct 64
11.23 Raelene Boyle 24 Jun 51 2f München 02 Sep 72
11.22 Raelene Boyle 24 Jun 51 3s2 Montreal 25 Jul 76
11.19 Kerry Johnson 23 Oct 63 1s2 Auckland 28 Jan 90
11.15 Melinda Gainsford (Taylor) 01 Oct 71 2f Nrnberg 15 Jun 95
11.14 Sally McLellan (Pearson) 19 Sep 86 1h3 Osaka 26 Aug 07
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Speedster » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:16 pm

Vault-emort wrote:
Speedster wrote:11.13 would be a low-alt AR!

Well she does hold the low-alt AR already!

PROGRESSION
11.65 Marjorie Jackson (Nelson) 13 Sep 31 1f Helsinki 22 Jul 52
11.58 Marilyn Black 20 May 44 1h6 Tokyo 14 Oct 64
11.4e Marilyn Black (Vassella) 20 May 44 1h2 Tokyo 15 Oct 64
11.23 Raelene Boyle 24 Jun 51 2f München 02 Sep 72
11.22 Raelene Boyle 24 Jun 51 3s2 Montreal 25 Jul 76
11.19 Kerry Johnson 23 Oct 63 1s2 Auckland 28 Jan 90
11.15 Melinda Gainsford (Taylor) 01 Oct 71 2f Nrnberg 15 Jun 95
11.14 Sally McLellan (Pearson) 19 Sep 86 1h3 Osaka 26 Aug 07


I thought MGT had a 11.14 from 94 as well?
Speedster
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: London

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:02 am

Speedster wrote:I thought MGT had a 11.14 from 94 as well?

Was it windy maybe? I thought her second best non-altitude time was 11.16 from '97
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Athleticsimaging » Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:30 am

Speedster wrote:I thought MGT had a 11.14 from 94 as well?


94 season:

11.12 +1.9 Sestriere 31 Jul
11.25 -0.2 Melbourne 24 Feb
11.28 +1.2 Victoria 23 Aug
11.29 +0.2 Victoria 22 Aug
11.31 -0.2 Victoria 23 Aug
11.38 -0.9 Hobart 21 Feb
11.39 0.0 Monte Carlo 2 Aug
11.41 +0.3 Portland 6 Aug
11.41 +0.3 Prince George 13 Aug
11.44 -1.1 Sydney 30 Jan
11.45 +1.1 Brisbane 5 Feb
Athleticsimaging
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:58 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby mal » Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:29 am

jackbean wrote:
Vault-emort wrote:The mission objective of AA should be to ensure maximum representation in all events at all international competitions.


Yeah, because in this global economy everyone has money to splash around. And send everyone! No standards to be an Olympian. Just run third at nationals in a weak athletics nation 7 seconds off the pace, and off you go. Please. :roll:


Not true ever.
I once ran third, had a qualifier and didn't go.
Its bad enough having the geography we do, and the out of season competition. Not everyone can go OS.
Australia has enough hurdles to overcome without making it even harder.
mal
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Athleticsimaging » Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:44 am

mal wrote:Australia has enough hurdles to overcome without making it even harder.


That's true. I don't understand the compulsion to berate Australian athletes and exult in their exclusion from teams for failing to perform to a standard that no northern hemisphere athlete ever has to. Can you imagine the the whinging and bitching of Euro and USA athletes if every Olympics and WC was held in season for the southern hemisphere???
Athleticsimaging
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:58 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:15 pm

Most of this is not breaking news, but shows there are still appeals happening in both men's relays. http://t.co/A4Ba5Jp8

Men’s 4x100m Relay **
Anthony Alozie, Tim Leathart, Andrew McCabe, Isaac Ntiamoah, Joshua Ross

Men’s 4x400m Relay **
Joel Milburn, Ben Offereins, Steven Solomon, John Steffensen

** Subject to the outcome of an ongoing appeal.

Probably why the Cole/Thomas names were removed from the 4x4 list (as they are individually qualified)?
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:26 pm

The pool of possible appellants is surely constrained to the following (from the 'shadow squad'):

Matt Davies (100m/200m)
Liam Gander (100m)
Jake Hammond (100m)
Aaron Rouge-Serret (100m/200m)
Alex Beck (400m)
Jackson Mallory (400m)
Alexander Rowe (400m)
Sean Wroe (400m)
AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:53 pm

AS wrote:The pool of possible appellants is surely constrained to the following (from the 'shadow squad'):

Matt Davies (100m/200m)
Liam Gander (100m)
Jake Hammond (100m)
Aaron Rouge-Serret (100m/200m)
Alex Beck (400m)
Jackson Mallory (400m)
Alexander Rowe (400m)
Sean Wroe (400m)


They just announced it's apparently only Davies and Beck (to be judged tonight).
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby typpo » Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:11 am

ABC TV are reporting the death of sprinter Daniel Batman in a car accident today in the Northern Territory. Sheesh...
typpo
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:04 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:19 am

:( One of our best-ever all-round sprint talents though probably never reached his full potential.

100m 10.19
200m 20.44
400m 45.04
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Athleticsimaging » Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:48 am

Vault-emort wrote:..... probably never reached his full potential.....


Make that "probably" a definitely, Vault-emort. I've never seen an athlete have so many changes of focus and breaks in training and yet still have such a great all round standard.

I had dinner with him a few years back in the city of churches and found him quite a nice guy. My condolences to his ex and their children.
Athleticsimaging
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:58 pm

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby AS » Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:45 am

Here's the story on Batman's passing:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-26/a ... section=nt

Sad news.
AS
 
Posts: 4503
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 1956 Olympic city

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby El Toro » Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:54 pm

Well, it looks like the early announcement by AA also has implications for the women's relay team members who don't have individual spots.

Australia has been put out of the top 16 after the heats of the EC relay gave the following:
    - Germany a new SB of 43.03 to go with a 43.19 for a total of 86.22 amd moved from 9th to 8th place, swapping places with Netherlands.
    - Poland ran a 43.13 SB to go with a 43.77 to total 86.90 from 17th to 10th
    - Switzerland a new SB of 43.51 to go with a 43.81 for a total of 87.32 and moved from 18th to 15th

UK is also out of top 16 at 17th place and was DQ'd, so no improvement possible in the final. Australia one place behind at 18th.

Looks like Hayley Butler (NSW), Jessica Knox (NSW), and Charlotte Van Veenendaal (Vic) will have to hand those uniforms back.
El Toro
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:05 pm

El Toro wrote:Looks like Hayley Butler (NSW), Jessica Knox (NSW), and Charlotte Van Veenendaal (Vic) will have to hand those uniforms back.

Sad but inevitable on the times put up this year.

Possibly a shame that a 4x1 in Europe last week (say Pearson/Breen/Brennan/Gayen) couldn't have had a go at a 43.5.
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby El Toro » Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:30 pm

A bit of Fairfax investigative output has been pointed AA and Eric Hollingsworth's way. Enjoy it before the journos all finish up their jobs.

Athletics chief fights back
El Toro
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby Vault-emort » Sun Jul 01, 2012 12:04 am

I see our men's 4x1 WILL get to run in London. They just clocked 38.68 in Japan.
Vault-emort
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:42 am
Location: In the pits

Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie - 2012

Postby El Toro » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:04 am

Vault-emort wrote:I see our men's 4x1 WILL get to run in London. They just clocked 38.68 in Japan.


Yep, Ghana and South Africa failed to improve at African champs - both would have had to improve to knock Australia out.
El Toro
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 9 guests