Return to Current Events

NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby JumboElliott » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:42 am

gktrack wrote:
JumboElliott wrote:Jeremy was hurt in 2011.. People who aren't named Michael Johnson simply don't run early season 43 second races..

Jumbo.. I really hope your optimism pans out, as it seems a lot of current Wariner doubters (and I just reluctantly fell into that group) really wish him well.

My point is that until there are three American runners who are clearly better than Jeremy, he cannot be summarily dismissed. You can really only say that McQuay and Merritt are clearly better than him at this point.
JumboElliott
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:46 am

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby ATK » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:51 am

JumboElliott wrote:
gktrack wrote:
JumboElliott wrote:Jeremy was hurt in 2011.. People who aren't named Michael Johnson simply don't run early season 43 second races..

Jumbo.. I really hope your optimism pans out, as it seems a lot of current Wariner doubters (and I just reluctantly fell into that group) really wish him well.

My point is that until there are three American runners who are clearly better than Jeremy, he cannot be summarily dismissed. You can really only say that McQuay and Merritt are clearly better than him at this point.

Berry is clearly better.
Gil Roberts is clearly better.
ATK
 
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby 26mi235 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:44 am

ATK wrote:Berry is clearly better.
Gil Roberts is clearly better.


You are sure that they would either beat Santos or finish a mere step behind? What makes you so certain?
26mi235
 
Posts: 14567
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby JumboElliott » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:53 am

Those are perhaps the two most inconsistent 400m runners in the world.
JumboElliott
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:46 am

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby nbonaddio » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:28 am

26mi235 wrote:
ATK wrote:Berry is clearly better.
Gil Roberts is clearly better.


You are sure that they would either beat Santos or finish a mere step behind? What makes you so certain?


How many times does Sprinter X have to run faster than Sprinter Y for it to become certain? McQuay, citing only one example, ran faster than JW four times in the span of 72 hours.
nbonaddio
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby ATK » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:33 am

26mi235 wrote:
ATK wrote:Berry is clearly better.
Gil Roberts is clearly better.


You are sure that they would either beat Santos or finish a mere step behind? What makes you so certain?

Huh?
Im talking about compared to Jeremy Wariner.

Berry ran 44.8 winning West Preliminary round after running 45 in the first round.
He then ran 45.0 in prelims and came second to McQuay in 44.7 at NCAA's
Those are 2 times superior to Wariner's season best.

Gil Roberts has run 44.93 in the season
Ran 46 then 45.4 at west prelims
ran 44.8 then 44.9 after rounds
Again he has 2 times superior to Warnier's season best.

There is nothing this year that has indicated Wariner will make the team.

Wariner has literally been running worse as the season goes on
44.5 relay split?
44.96
45.04
45.68
45.30
And that does not include beating competition, he has only won one open 400m race.

He has lost to
Merrit
K James
Chris Brown
Angelo Taylor
Kevin Borlee
Martin Rooney
and Santos

In terms of time, he is the #5 american in the world this year, was #4 last year.

He has broken 45 once, while 3 of the 4 ahead of him have done it at least twice.

Lets face it, you guys are trying to give Wariner the benefit of the doubt considering his past.
ATK
 
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby 26mi235 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:07 pm

nbonaddio wrote:
26mi235 wrote:
ATK wrote:Berry is clearly better.
Gil Roberts is clearly better.


You are sure that they would either beat Santos or finish a mere step behind? What makes you so certain?


How many times does Sprinter X have to run faster than Sprinter Y for it to become certain? McQuay, citing only one example, ran faster than JW four times in the span of 72 hours.


It counts a lot when it is in the same venue at the same time. In other cases the times can be significantly affected by a variety of factors. That is why using Santos as a metric is useful. Not sure why that concept is so hard to accept. None of those guys has beaten Santos (Merritt, but he is not the one you are arguing about). And Santos' 44.45 has run better times than the collegiate crew, I think (and those guys are peaking to some extent). Thus, finishing only 0.06 behind him gives reason to pause when interpreting the 45.30 as being much weaker than some guys at the NCAAs. Yes, he might not have it this year, but this race does not tell you that in any unambiguous way.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14567
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby 2x800x2 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:26 pm

This back and forth on Wariner is kinda fun, but this can't possibly go past the Oly trials, which are coming right up. All shall be revealed.
BTW, Track and Field News (TFN) has JW at #2 in their US form chart (as of May 21):
1. LaShawn Merritt
2. Jeremy Wariner
3. Angelo Taylor
4. Gil Roberts
5. Tony McQuay
6. Bryshon Nellum
7. Calvin Smith
8. Manteo Mitchell
9. Greg Nixon
10. David Verburg
They (TFN) also have Germaine Gonzales taking bronze in the games behind Merritt and James, but I'm not feelin' that.
2x800x2
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby trackdug » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:50 pm

So what does TFN know about Wariner that we don't? They pretty much nailed the NCAA 400m.
trackdug
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:54 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby JumboElliott » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:52 pm

The most recent form chart has him finishing fourth at trials, which is about right. I don't think he's going to win or finish second, but third is a distinct possibility.
JumboElliott
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:46 am

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby ATK » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:47 am

I will be very surprised if he finishes top 3 at trials. Like I said, there's been no indication.
ATK
 
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby 2x800x2 » Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:27 pm

Just saw this on the TFN site, it is the most honest I've seen JW yet:

http://www.nbcolympics.com/news-blogs/t ... place.html

It includes a link to video of the the Oly 400m finals in 2008. JW sure didn't want to talk about the whole Coach Hart issue after the race, did he! Can't say I blame him for being defensive. That move seems hard to justify, especially considering how JW went back to CH.

Anyway, JW likened the present to 2004 when he was not favored to win, although in his mind he picked himself as favorite. We'll see...I hate to say it, but JW winning gold sounds far-fetched at this point.
2x800x2
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby ATK » Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:30 am

2x800x2 wrote:Just saw this on the TFN site, it is the most honest I've seen JW yet:

http://www.nbcolympics.com/news-blogs/t ... place.html

It includes a link to video of the the Oly 400m finals in 2008. JW sure didn't want to talk about the whole Coach Hart issue after the race, did he! Can't say I blame him for being defensive. That move seems hard to justify, especially considering how JW went back to CH.

Anyway, JW likened the present to 2004 when he was not favored to win, although in his mind he picked himself as favorite. We'll see...I hate to say it, but JW winning gold sounds far-fetched at this point.

That was a good read from Wariner. Its good to know that he is care free now and not "cocky", confused every time he looses.
ATK
 
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby user4 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:48 am

ATK wrote:I will be very surprised if he finishes top 3 at trials. Like I said, there's been no indication.


There are more indications that he wont even make the final of the trials than that he will make the top 3. That article was not encouraging, I have never known of a case where increased domestic burdens and responsibilities has led to better performances.
user4
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:05 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby vip » Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:59 am

Wariner has been humbled by his fall, which can be traced to his money-driven decision to leave Clyde Hart. Merritt probably would've beaten him in 2008 anyway. Still, Wariner has to live with a decision based on greed, and I'm sure it can't be comfortable.

Kind of serves him right. I'm not wishing him ill or anything, but he rolled the dice and lost. He gave up on a guy who was loyal and coached him since college. All over a few dollars. Then, when things didn't go well, he went running back. Could you see Sanya RR doing that? No. Wariner always came across as aloof and cocky when he was No. 1. But now, he seems, shall I say, likable.

He'll be thrilled with relay gold at this point, because even if he makes the team in the 400, he won't medal. May not make the Olympic final. And also, would Wariner be chosen to run the relay in the final? Or in the prelims? That might get political.
vip
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:54 am

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby gktrack » Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:09 am

user4 wrote:... I have never known of a case where increased domestic burdens and responsibilities has led to better performances.

L. Demus and C. Lowe and Chicherova, to name a recent few, have done pretty well their increased domestic responsibilities ...
gktrack
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:42 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby 26mi235 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:12 am

FBK [see below], etc, etc, but of course for women it is much easier because the man does everything at home........

Of course, this really means that you should look at the thousands and thousands of professional football and basketball and baseball players that seem to do just fine having kids added to the household. This [getting married/having kids] mistaken, blinders-driven comment is so far off the mark that calls into question the validity of anything else connected to the comment.


As for JW not making the final, that seems to be based on what I think is a mistaken reading of the race results (e.g., losing by a step to the top emerging athlete in the event while outrunning all the other good 400 runners in the race down the stretch). I rate his chances of being top-3 better than his odds of not making the Final.

Francina "Fanny" Elsje Blankers-Koen (26 April 1918 – 25 January 2004 (aged 85)) was a Dutch athlete, best known for winning four gold medals at the 1948 Summer Olympics in London. She accomplished this as a 30 year old mother of two, during a time when many disregarded women's athletics.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14567
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby ATK » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:22 am

26mi235 wrote:As for JW not making the final, that seems to be based on what I think is a mistaken reading of the race results (e.g., losing by a step to the top emerging athlete in the event while outrunning all the other good 400 runners in the race down the stretch). I rate his chances of being top-3 better than his odds of not making the Final.

Why do you keep evaluating his potential at trials off this one race and not his entire season?
ATK
 
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby 26mi235 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:59 pm

Title of thread is one clue, and the commentary that came about specifically references this race.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14567
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: NEW YORK DL-400m: Luguelín SANTOS 45.24

Postby ATK » Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:13 pm

26mi235 wrote:Title of thread is one clue, and the commentary that came about specifically references this race.

Seems like an odd and irrational thing to do... :?
ATK
 
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Previous

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aaronk, eldanielfire, exdrake, Gabriella, norunner, pavlik and 15 guests