Return to Things Not T&F

Politicians question academic requirements for jocks

A place for the discussion of all things not closely related to the sport and its competitive side. (Locked down several times a year during the major championships)

Politicians question academic requirements for jocks

Postby Rye Catcher » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:16 pm

According to the pols, if you can stuff the ball, to hell with an education. I wonder if these donkeys would whine as much if the school was UCLA? No wonder this country is in trouble, our leaders are idiots.

http://news.yahoo.com/connecticut-lawma ... --spt.html
Last edited by Rye Catcher on Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:15 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Rye Catcher
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Polititians downgrade academic requirements

Postby guru » Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:22 pm

That thread headline is more than a little misleading. Nothing has been "downgraded". Just a bunch of election year soundbite bluster from the hometown politicos.
guru
 
Posts: 10254
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Strava, racking KOMs http://tinyurl.com/afuwyj8

Re: Polititians downgrade academic requirements

Postby Rye Catcher » Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:40 pm

guru wrote:That thread headline is more than a little misleading. Nothing has been "downgraded". Just a bunch of election year soundbite bluster from the hometown politicos.


Is that better?
Rye Catcher
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Polititians question academic requirements for jocks

Postby jhc68 » Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:46 pm

Outrageous... the NCAA actually expects that 51% of the team should be making progress toward graduation!!!
Me, I'd say that any athlete not taking and passing enough of the proper units toward graduation should be immediately ineligible. Guess I must be some sort of egghead idealist.
jhc68
 
Posts: 3104
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Polititians question academic requirements for jocks

Postby gh » Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:57 pm

A brilliant piece, looking at "student athlete" graduation rates that we had on the front page a week or so ago:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/31/opini ... .html?_r=2
gh
 
Posts: 43137
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Re: Polititians question academic requirements for jocks

Postby Conor Dary » Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:54 am

One of my favorite NYTimes columnists. A great piece.
Conor Dary
 
Posts: 6297
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: कनोर दारी in Ronald MacDonald's Home Town, and once a Duck always a Duck.

Re: Polititians question academic requirements for jocks

Postby gm » Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:26 am

Crack wise all you want, but as someone with more than a slight interest in this subject and skin in the game, I would urge you to immerse yourselves in the NCAA manual and see just what APR is all about.

I can't speak for major football or basketball, since those have their own specific issues, but track and field coaches across the country sweat it every semester. You have one or two folks who don't pass a class, or make a C when a B is required in the major, and you may be in trouble. It doesn't take a lot to drop the APR below the danger level.

EDIT: And the fact you misspelled the very first word of this thread title is hilarious.
gm
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: "What's the pre-cooked weight on that lab?"

Re: Polititians question academic requirements for jocks

Postby Rye Catcher » Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:16 pm

gm wrote:Crack wise all you want, but as someone with more than a slight interest in this subject and skin in the game, I would urge you to immerse yourselves in the NCAA manual and see just what APR is all about.

I can't speak for major football or basketball, since those have their own specific issues, but track and field coaches across the country sweat it every semester. You have one or two folks who don't pass a class, or make a C when a B is required in the major, and you may be in trouble. It doesn't take a lot to drop the APR below the danger level.

EDIT: And the fact you misspelled the very first word of this thread title is hilarious.


I didn't think it looked right so it is corrected.
Rye Catcher
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:00 pm


Return to Things Not T&F

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests