Return to Things Not T&F

2011 College Football

A place for the discussion of all things not closely related to the sport and its competitive side. (Locked down several times a year during the major championships)

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Marlow » Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:09 am

Avante wrote:Now show me what those coachs said about SEC football. Prove your point!

I'm paraphrasing here but I believe this is what Ara Parseghian had to say on December 31, 1973, after beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl for the National Championship,

"If those players from Bama had played with any passion, they would have won, because we are merely mechanical robots with no heart and we still won!" :P
Marlow
 
Posts: 18728
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Avante » Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:26 am

Marlow wrote:
Avante wrote:Now show me what those coachs said about SEC football. Prove your point!

I'm paraphrasing here but I believe this is what Ara Parseghian had to say on December 31, 1973, after beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl for the National Championship,

"If those players from Bama had played with any passion, they would have won, because we are merely mechanical robots with no heart and we still won!" :P


Marlow... :roll:

paste,,,

“For anyone thinking of writing a book about the Southeastern Conference, forget it. The definitive SEC football book has already been written. You might try, but you won't live up to the standard that has been set by Richard Scott, a frequent contributor for Lindy's magazines. Scott has written SEC Football, 75 Years of Pride and Passion, a beautifully illustrated 240-page history of SEC football published by Voyageur Press. Scott has written about Southeastern Conference football since 1989. He brings considerable knowledge about the*** uniqueness of SEC football and the passion it inspires among its fans***** SEC Football celebrates the history makers, heroes, characters, and games that have made the SEC a force beyond reckoning. The book explores the players and the coaches, the teams and the traditions, and the great games and individual performances that have defined each decade of SEC football. The book contains 150 color and 150 black and white photographs from each school and each decade. SEC Football, 75 Years of Pride and Passion is a must for any Southeastern Conference football fan, but college football fans in general will find it great reading.” – Ben Cook, Lindy’s

Bro, I've been into college football a long long time, I've read a ton of stuff about the sport. I know what I'm seeing...ok?
Avante
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:31 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:18 am

Marlow wrote:That's all we're sayin' here, bro. All BoiSt had on their record was Georgia, which is a 20-25 team. With this win, CLEARLY Stanford will jump them, yes? :

Wrong! The LSOP #4, Marlow U #6. :lol:
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:22 am

Avante wrote:Birmingham, New Orleans, Tuskaloosa could never be confused with Frisco, LA, San Diego. A totally different world.

Have you ever been to New Orleans? :? It's a lot closer the San Francisco than it is to Tuscaloosa.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:33 am

The consensus opinion around here is that this will go down as the greatest team in school history if LSU finishes the season the way they've played through the first eight games. It's unfortunate that it had to be in a year in which Alabama is fielding one of its greatest teams of all times. These teams are so evenly matched its scary. Here's what I mean.

    10/01/11: Alabama 38 - Florida 10
    10/08/11: LSU 41 - Florida 11
    10/15/11: LSU 38 - Tennessee 7
    10/22/11: Alabama 37 - Tennessee 6
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Marlow » Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:41 am

Avante wrote: I know what I'm seeing...ok?

No.
Marlow
 
Posts: 18728
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby 26mi235 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:41 am

Maybe Nebraska moved to the SEC instead of the Big Ten. When they played Wisconsin a couple of weeks ago there were 10,000 - 20,000 fans that came without tickets or really even the prospect of tickets (there were additional fans that DID have tickets), in part because the stadium only seats 82,000 or so. [It is 'only' an eight-hour drive if you do not have to fight 10,000 other fans on almost half of the non-interstate route.]

Of course, Nebraska is a bit of a special case because they have no pro teams anywhere close etc.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14562
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby lonewolf » Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:37 am

Nebraska fans are reknowned for travelling en masse..whereever, whenever.. Caribou, Key West, San Diego or Seattle, they snap up their allotment..
lonewolf
 
Posts: 8003
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Indian Territory

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Bruce Kritzler » Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:51 am

One big difference between the South the the rest of the US - High school spring football practice.
Bruce Kritzler
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jhc68 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:52 pm

Passion, eh? Ever been in Idaho during a Boise State bowl game? It's not regional fandom, it is state wide. Not many Idahoans but on big game days about 2/3rds of them are wearing those gawdawful Boise State colors.

I was there during the Oklahoma upset and the whole state stopped. Not just special sections in the local papers, the entire editions were devoted to the game. And 6 months later in mids-summer every Walmart and appliance store was still running the video of the game on every demo TV set for sale.
jhc68
 
Posts: 3104
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby KevinM » Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:40 pm

I'll agree with Avante here (gulp). The same thing happens in college basketball. I grew up <50 miles from UNC, NC State, Duke, and just a bit further Wake Forest. I then spent HS in KS and attended KU. Even though the individual passion at a Kansas matched what ACC fans felt about their schools, the absence of other consistent giant programs in the immediate area or even neighboring states made things less intense. I'd expand it beyond the SEC, though - the density of the high-profile Big 12 (UT, TAMU, OU), SEC, and ACC (FSU, Miami, Clemson, VaTech) teams just adds to the Southern religion of CFB.
KevinM
 
Posts: 2417
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby gh » Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:32 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:
Avante wrote:Birmingham, New Orleans, Tuskaloosa could never be confused with Frisco, LA, San Diego. A totally different world.

Have you ever been to New Orleans? :? It's a lot closer the San Francisco than it is to Tuscaloosa.


In many respects, it's San Francisco that's chasing New Orleans!

Laissez les bon temps roulez!
gh
 
Posts: 43141
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:49 am

The wise guys favor Marlow U by 7.5 over the Trojans. Will the Cardinal cover? By the way Marlow, which Stanford team is generally considered the greatest in school history, and how does this one compare?
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:54 am

Mathieu Simon & Ware to be reinstated Tuesday

http://dennis-dodd.blogs.cbssports.com/ ... a_txt_0001

The stage has now been set. Both LSU and Alabama should be at full-strength barring some practice injury or other unforeseen event or accident. By the way, the wise guys are favoring the Tide by 6. This means they think they are 3 points better than LSU on a neutral field. We'll see how wise they are.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Avante » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:58 am

jazzcyclist wrote:The wise guys favor Marlow U by 7.5 over the Trojans. Will the Cardinal cover? By the way Marlow, which Stanford team is generally considered the greatest in school history, and how does this one compare?


I won't spoil it :D Been awhile since anyone talked...Wow Boys.

Just so ya know..

A..wise guy...is a successful gambler. They don't set the betting line, that is done by a...linemaker.

Will those "wise guys" move the line in favor of Bama or LSU? I'm guessing by kickoff...Alabama ..minus 7.5
Last edited by Avante on Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Avante
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:31 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Avante » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:04 am

Marlow wrote:
Avante wrote: I know what I'm seeing...ok?

No.


Sheesh :roll:
Avante
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:31 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:14 am

Since it was probably on a similar thread last year I made the comment that is WRONG, I will indicate so here. I thought that a particular college quarterback that could outrun and out-wit college guys behind a line that was good enough for beating most college lines and was good enough to beat college coverage would not do that well in the pros. Some pros disagreed and one set drafted him VERY high -- and they were right.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14562
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby gh » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:34 am

If you're talking Newton, sign me up as failed NFL scout too. I saw him as a happy-feet kinda guy who would get crushed in the pocked on a regular basis. (well, as well as you "crush" a guy his size)
gh
 
Posts: 43141
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Pego » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:00 am

gh wrote:If you're talking Newton, sign me up as failed NFL scout too. I saw him as a happy-feet kinda guy who would get crushed in the pocked on a regular basis. (well, as well as you "crush" a guy his size)


So did I. I thought, he would turn to be another Vince Young. When my grandson drafted him for his fantasy team, I laughed my ass off. No more.
Pego
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Marlow » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:33 am

gh wrote: as well as you "crush" a guy his size)

One key to his success is indeed his size. You don't need to have happy feet when you're as big/fast as the linebacker trying to catch/hit you.
Marlow
 
Posts: 18728
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:27 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:By the way Marlow, which Stanford team is generally considered the greatest in school history, and how does this one compare?

In case you didn't see this earlier, what say you, Marlow?
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:37 pm

CBS's Bowl Projections

Oklahoma vs Michigan, Fiesta
Clemson vs West Virginia, Orange
Oregon vs Wisconsin, Rose
Boise State vs LSU & Alabama vs Stanford, both in New Orleans :wink:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... redictions
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Marlow » Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:42 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:By the way Marlow, which Stanford team is generally considered the greatest in school history, and how does this one compare?

In case you didn't see this earlier, what say you, Marlow?

Avante called it: the 1940 Wow Boys, undefeated Rose Bowl winners.
If (that's a very big IF) SU can run the table this year, even if they don't make the BSC Bowl, this year's team will surpass them. They have a juggernaut run game, a stout defense, three superb tight ends, a speed guy in Owusu, and a decent QB. :wink:
Marlow
 
Posts: 18728
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby odelltrclan » Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:52 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:CBS's Bowl Projections

Oklahoma vs Michigan, Fiesta
Clemson vs West Virginia, Orange
Oregon vs Wisconsin, Rose
Boise State vs LSU &
Alabama vs Stanford, both in New Orleans :wink:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... redictions


Those predictions may be a little presumptuous considering Michigan State beat Michigan and leads their half of the conference and just beat Wisconsin as well.

If they knock of Nebraska, they have all of the hardest games behind them.
odelltrclan
 
Posts: 1348
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:30 pm
Location: Gilbert, Arizona

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Marlow » Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:16 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:Alabama vs Stanford, both in New Orleans
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... redictions

Those guys at CBS are freakin geniuses!!!
Nawlins is only 8 hours from here, so I looked at Stubhub to see what tix might be. A TICKET starts at 1 cool G . . . :(
Marlow
 
Posts: 18728
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:48 pm

Marlow wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:Alabama vs Stanford, both in New Orleans
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... redictions

Those guys at CBS are freakin geniuses!!!
Nawlins is only 8 hours from here, so I looked at Stubhub to see what tix might be. A TICKET starts at 1 cool G . . . :(

If they lose to Oregon, your boys might still play in New Orleans, but it would be January 3 instead of January 9, and the tickets would be a lot cheaper.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Marlow » Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:56 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:If they lose to Oregon, your boys might still play in New Orleans, but it would be January 3 instead of January 9, and the tickets would be a lot cheaper.

Don't be so negative!!
I went to Miami for the Orange Bowl this past January, so I might be up for the Sugar Bowl.
Marlow
 
Posts: 18728
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby donley2 » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:32 pm

I am a Kansas State grad so I am probably incapable of truly impartial judgement, but can someone who is literate in these matters explain to me how Kansas State is a 14 point underdog at home against OU. I am not prepared to argue they should be favored. I am only prepared to argue that anything greater than a 7 point betting line favoring OU is excessive. If Kansas State gets blown away at their place I guess I will have to eat my crow, but I just don't see that as likely. It is certainly possible but I don't see it as likely.
donley2
 
Posts: 1866
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby lonewolf » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:18 pm

After OU's showing against Kansas and Texas Tech, I am beginning to think they may be enjoying the fruits of their reputation rather than current proficiency.
lonewolf
 
Posts: 8003
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Indian Territory

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Dutra » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:39 pm

Bruce Kritzler wrote:One big difference between the South the the rest of the US - High school spring football practice.


Middle School in some states.
Dutra
 
Posts: 2288
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:12 pm

donley2 wrote:I am a Kansas State grad so I am probably incapable of truly impartial judgement.

Between Stanford, Oklahoma State, Oregon, Wisconsin, Kansas State, and of course LSU, it seems like every poster here is connected to, and has a rooting interest in, one of the Crystal Football title contenders. If your Wildcats can pass their test this weekend, they should instantly become the media darlings of college football. If LSU can't win the Crystal Football, I would love to see a Cinderella, like Kansas State, take home the trophy.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby jazzcyclist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:14 pm

Marlow wrote:If (that's a very big IF) SU can run the table this year, even if they don't make the BSC Bowl, this year's team will surpass them. They have a juggernaut run game, a stout defense, three superb tight ends, a speed guy in Owusu, and a decent QB. :wink:

I heard an analyst point out that Stanford's biggest weakness is their lack of speedy recievers, which means that Luck would be throwing into very small passing windows against teams like LSU and Alabama with great lockdown cornerbacks.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby 502CD » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:08 am

odelltrclan wrote:Those predictions may be a little presumptuous considering Michigan State beat Michigan and leads their half of the conference and just beat Wisconsin as well.

If they knock of Nebraska, they have all of the hardest games behind them.


While I think it's ridiculous that they're predicting Michigan to the Fiesta, MSU beating UM will have no relevance to the bowl decision. In 1999 MSU beat UM and Michigan still went to the Orange Bowl while MSU went to the Citrus.

By the way, that Orange Bowl game against Alabama was awesome and Tom Brady's last game at Michigan.
502CD
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:45 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Avante » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:13 am

26mi235 wrote:Since it was probably on a similar thread last year I made the comment that is WRONG, I will indicate so here. I thought that a particular college quarterback that could outrun and out-wit college guys behind a line that was good enough for beating most college lines and was good enough to beat college coverage would not do that well in the pros. Some pros disagreed and one set drafted him VERY high -- and they were right.


I thought Newton would be a middle of the pack-er after a few seasons. EL Wrongo!
Avante
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:31 am

Re: 2011 College Football

Postby Avante » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:24 am

jazzcyclist wrote:
Marlow wrote:If (that's a very big IF) SU can run the table this year, even if they don't make the BSC Bowl, this year's team will surpass them. They have a juggernaut run game, a stout defense, three superb tight ends, a speed guy in Owusu, and a decent QB. :wink:

I heard an analyst point out that Stanford's biggest weakness is their lack of speedy recievers, which means that Luck would be throwing into very small passing windows against teams like LSU and Alabama with great lockdown cornerbacks.


There is no such thing as a "lockdown" corner, that is a myth. They all get beat, some a little less than others. You also don't need sprint speed to be a great receiver. Ray Berry, Fred Biletnikoff and Steve Largent were as lethal as any 4.3 guy.

Owusu can blow by any defensive back, he has "enought" speed to make it work.
Avante
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:31 am

PreviousNext

Return to Things Not T&F

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests