What an inane thing for Grassley to say. Using his logic, with the way Congress is spending, they should all do "the honorable thing" as well.
meanwhile, AIG still knows how to spend money
122 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
What an inane thing for Grassley to say. Using his logic, with the way Congress is spending, they should all do "the honorable thing" as well.
<<“We cannot attract and retain the best and brightest talent to lead and staff” the company “if employees believe that their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury,” he said.>>
To quote Jon Stewart's closing in his rants against CNBC: "Fuck you!" In the kleptocracy that is Wall Street it was the "best and brightest" who led the country down the primrose path. I'd sure hate to see what trouble we'd be in if they had hired people with scruples.
The biggest fall out of the bonus scandal may be Obama's economic plan. While we should all be outraged at AIG, we should not shoot ourselves in the foot and put a halt to stabilizing the financial sector. If it fails, the economy fails.
Look at China, while we fiddle around slowed by the vagaries of Democracy, they create stimulus bills without opposition, and are now buying up many good deals world wide in a "fire sale." And that's with "our" dollars, not theirs.
Good point! Could be both and either or a wonderful mix of shit.
Fine with me. Incompetent ones get fired, the corrupt ones imprisoned. Neither option calls for a bonus.
Another idea: create a special AIG Bonus Tax!
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/17/ ... index.html
73 AIG execs got a million bucks each; 11 no longer even work for the company
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... .DTL&tsp=1
AIG, Merril Lynch, Leh, etc. CEOs gave themselves massive, multi-million dollar bonuses for 30hours per week of work, the remainder performed on the golf course while they were driving their companies into the dirt. The Fed's "martket's" response was to give them billions in taxpayer dollars from joe sixpack's daughter's college fund. Sounds like a great business plan, what american CEO would not try to parlay that into a double.. one more time
No they didn't. The Fed "created" the funds, and electronically transferred them to the institutions. No actual taxpayer funds have been used(so far). Normally inflationary, but not in this environment.
i don't see how on earth you can keep waffling on with this drivel it doesn't make a shitload of difference whether fed asks for libor + 10,000, they ain't getting a red cent back ! i never looked at this ugly named topic before but it seems to never die, so it looked a view on a leisurely friday looking at near 100 posts here, no one has actually bothered to get to the colonel ( or even kernel ) of aig's death ??? i've been e-mailed addenda from a general 'broker for months ( along with any other guy who opens an account ) - post it next
If that's the case(and it may well be) there will be a nice yard sale on the front steps of the Fed in a couple of years(or sooner). I'm sure those coveted insurance divisions will fetch a pretty penny.
eh ?
- house/contents/car/pooch insurance division worth maybe for argument's sake $10 billion - let's not beat about bush here - mexican cottonpickers on few $/week getting $500k mortages off 0 deposit on proviso they can repay monthly mortgage for 25y ( on guarantee they'd stuff house wth 1/2 dozen cottonpickers, constantly, to pay it back ) - worth $100 billion banks ( name them yourself - citigroup, merill, lehman, etc) accepted these mortgages & deluded themselves into thinking they had rock-solid/ricardo montalban clients wrapped these shit mortgages into bonds, which rating companies like moody's, standard & poor's, fitch's didn't do due diligence & accepted banks' word of reliability & wrapped this crap into AAA ( treasury status ) or even AAB ( top-junk ) AAA/AAB has to have an insurer for failure - considered impossible for this quality of product aig were just poor suckers who stepped up to the plate...
Cartoon on the breaking of "guaranteed" contracts (as in, white-collar vs. blue)
http://wpcomics.washingtonpost.com/clie ... 009/03/17/
We're mad as hell and we're not gonna take it anymore!!!!
Of course the feverish atmosphere contributes to theater of the absurd. Where I live the city workers just got a 4% raise, followed immediately by an announcement that they would all be obliged to take an unpaid furlough amounting to 5% of their annual pay. (Say what?) This prompted the local union thumpers to proclaim that city workers are just like AIG suits in terms of stealing taxpayer money and that unions are driving the nation to bankruptcy -even though the city workers will take a net 1% pay cut. It's an odd world.
These corporate hacks just don't get it, do they? Citigroup talking about a $10M office remodel?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... LGVE_YzvUU
Well, you know how it is. When someone gives you a load of money or your credit card limit goes up another thou, sometimes you just feel like going to the mall and splashing the cash!
Athletics, what has been your thoughts on EU Parliament member Daniel Hannan?
I just watched his speech (which can be found on YouTube) and it's well worth watching. Although my politics aren't the same as his I find it very hard to disagree with what he says. I'd not seen the video, so thanks for inspiring me to look it up. My only criticism is that he was too polite! The backlash against the banking world's fat cats has started and it's getting quite ugly here. There's been huge criticism of Sir Fred Goodwin, former CEO of the Royal Bank of Scotland, a recipient of £20 bilion of public money in bailout funds. He's been vilified for getting a pension worth £700,000 per year. Not as much as you'd get on Wall St but people were very angry about it. Anyway, his home's been vandalised: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edi ... 962825.stm Some windows smashed and his car damaged but no one hurt. There's a lot of people that resent him for being so well rewarded when the bank he was in charge of is one of the main reasons for the economy tanking like it has.
A view from the other side of things:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/25/opini ... antis.html
I read the entire article and he just does not get it. 1. I wonder, if he were quite so cavalier giving the money away without the public outcry. 2. The medical multispecialty group I worked for majority of my professional life had many specialties with different levels of productivity. The reimbursement system varied accordingly. Neurosurgeons and orthopods kept a lesser percentage of their productivity than say, the pediatricians. In good times, everybody retained more, in bad times less, with the same proportion. Now, if we went bankrupt and the government would come to our rescue, would those neurosurgeons claim that they still produced, while the pediatricians caused the slide, so they should still get their reward, while those pediatricians go to pasture? Rather absurd concept and that is exactly what DeSantis defends. His company went belly-up, for crying out loud. Whether he caused it or not is immaterial. 3. Sniffling about his humble origin and years of hard work, geez. How many people can say that, making a fraction of what he did. I am sure, he is not standing in a soup kitchen line.
It seems ironic that De Santis (presumably a free market kind of guy) complains about being betrayed by his employer (who, by all free market logic, should have gone belly up months ago) and by the government (since taxpayers have subsidized De Santis presumably large salary during that time).
His reaction seems childish and irrational - if he feels he deserves the jumbo bonus then he ought to keep it and stay at his job. The guy doesn't appear to grasp the situation he is in and has adopted the mentality of a spoiled kid on the playground throwing a tizzy fit: he's going to take his ball and go home and not come back anymore. That'll show 'em all ! So he quits a failed company. Does he expect wide public sympathy for playing the victim? Me, I'd be interested to see his donation of the bonus money documented. Think he will wait to see if the punitive tax laws aimed at him pass?
Man, I hate it when I'm right.
AIG shows $1.8 billion profit in latest quarter(first black numbers since '07), stock up 65% on the year. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32328138/ns ... -earnings/
Fed made $45 Billion in 2009. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... %3Dtopnews
There is potentially more trouble ahead. From the same article:
'While that resulted in higher earnings in 2009, it exposes the Fed to more risks down the road. "They've moved up the risk-return curve, as they have more long-term assets and more things that involve credit risk," said Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial.' cman
For the record, Goldman Sachs repaid it's TARP loan of $10 Billion in June, netting the Fed $1.42 Billion in interest. http://bailout.propublica.org/entities/ ... dman-sachs
122 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |