Return to Current Events

Spectator PR's

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Postby berkeley » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:58 pm

observer2 wrote:Men:

...
800 m: 1.41.87 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)


Huh ? Last I heard, Coe ran 1:41.73 back in 1981.
berkeley
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Spectator PR's

Postby tandfman » Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:16 am

berkeley wrote:... or maybe he can just change it to Greene's windy 9.78, Stanford 2003. I'm pretty sure gh was there.

Most people don't count windy marks when doing their PR list. I've seen a faster 100m than the one I've listed for myself, but it was windy, so I don't have it on my list.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby observer2 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:42 pm

berkeley wrote:
observer2 wrote:Men:

...
800 m: 1.41.87 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)


Huh ? Last I heard, Coe ran 1:41.73 back in 1981.



Sorry, my mistake. Don´t know where the"87" came from. :shock:
Of course should be;

800m: 1.41.73 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)

Thanks!
observer2
 
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:47 am

Postby Justin Clouder » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:25 pm

observer2 wrote:Of course should be;

800m: 1.41.73 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)

An off-topic trivia question - why should that mark never have been a world record?

Justin
Justin Clouder
 
Posts: 1200
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:14 am
Location: London, UK

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:58 pm

Justin Clouder wrote:
observer2 wrote:Of course should be;

800m: 1.41.73 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)

An off-topic trivia question - why should that mark never have been a world record?

Justin


No drug testing? I hope you are not saying suspended by his federation.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14502
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Postby Justin Clouder » Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:02 pm

26mi235 wrote:
Justin Clouder wrote:
observer2 wrote:Of course should be: 800m: 1.41.73 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)

An off-topic trivia question - why should that mark never have been a world record?

No drug testing? I hope you are not saying suspended by his federation.

No, nothing like that. It has nothing to do with Kipketer at all.

Justin
Justin Clouder
 
Posts: 1200
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:14 am
Location: London, UK

Postby tandfman » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:57 pm

It''s that time of year again. I don't expect to be going to any more track meets this season, and so I've updated my spectator PR list, which appears at the top of the first page of this thread. It's been a terrific year in that department. Last year, I saw only one PR; this year I saw eleven of them. Of course Beijing helped, but so did a number of other places.

For those of you who are new to the Boards, or to this thread, read the post that started the thread. The numbers aren't important--the text is. I still think that keeping spectator PR's is a great way to enhance your enjoyment of the sport, no matter how many or how few meets you attend.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby kuha » Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:49 pm

I got two: 100 (9.72) and 10,000 (26:25).
kuha
 
Posts: 8580
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Postby ndamix » Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:30 pm

lonewolf wrote:I have never compiled a list of the best performances I have witnessed and may be too far behind to start now but have a questions about the ground rules.
If one is officiating another event concurrent with an exceptional performance in another event but duties prevented actually observing the event, does it count?
CO-SIGN (although I try to watch other events once I'm done doing my officiating event). :D :wink: 8-)
ndamix
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Where I Have My Eye On You

Postby nevetsllim » Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:18 am

I'm trying to go for the world junior record of spectators PBs :twisted: I can't be bothered to remember all of them but here are some of the better ones

Outdoors
100m - 9.94 Powell - 2008 Crystal Palace
200m - 19.76 Bolt - 2008 CP
400m - 44.05 Wariner - 2007 CP
3000m - 7:26.69 Bekele - 2007 Sheffield
Marathon - 2:06.18 Rutto - 2004 FLM
High jump - 2.38m Silnov - 2008 CP
Pole vault - 5.97m Lukyanenko and Hooker - 2008 CP
Triple jump - 17.46m Idowu - 2008 Annecy (Euro Cup)
Shot put - 22.43m Hoffa - 2007 CP

Indoors
60m - 6.51 Fasuba - 2008 Valencia WICh
800m - 1:44.91 Kaki - 2008 Valencia
2 miles - 8:04.xx Bekele - 2008 Birmingham
60mH - 7.46 Liu Xiang - 2008 Valencia
LJ - 8.30m Howe - 2007 Birmingham EICh
TJ - 17.75m Idowu - 2008 Valencia
HJ - 2.36m Holm 2008 Valencia
PV - 5.90m Lukyanenko 2008 Valencia
SP - 21.77m Cantwell 2008 Valencia
Hep - 6371 Clay 2008 Valencia

Outdoors
100m - 10.87 VCB - CP 2008
200m - 22.19 Felix - Birmingham 2006
400m - 49.79 Richards - CP 2007
Marathon - 2:22:35 - Okoro FLM 2004
3000m SC - 9:22.82 - Petrova Birmingham 2006
LJ - 7.04m Kolchanova - Annecy 2008
HJ - 2.03m Friedrich - Annecy 2008
PV - 4.93m Isinbayeva - CP 2008
HT - 76.24m Lysenko - Birmingham 2006

Indoors
60m - 7.06 A. Williams - Valencia 2008
400m - 50.02 Sanders - Birmingham EICh 2007
1500m - 3:57.71 Soboleva - Valencia 2008
3000m - 8:31.94 Burka - Birmingham 2008
60mH - 7.75 Kallur - Birmingham 2008
LJ - 7.00m Gomes - Valencia 2008
TJ - 15.05m Savigne - Valencia 2008
HJ - 2.05m Hellebaut - Birmingham 2007
PV - 4.76m Feofanova - Birmingham 2007 (at least Sveta beats Issy at something!)
SP - 20.19m Vili - Valencia 2008
Pent - 4944 points - Kluft 2008
nevetsllim
 
Posts: 6100
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:54 am
Location: http://twitter.com/Trackside2012

Postby 26mi235 » Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:47 pm

Justin Clouder wrote:
26mi235 wrote:
Justin Clouder wrote:
observer2 wrote:Of course should be: 800m: 1.41.73 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)

An off-topic trivia question - why should that mark never have been a world record?

No drug testing? I hope you are not saying suspended by his federation.

No, nothing like that. It has nothing to do with Kipketer at all.

Justin


Let me be clear here; my guess was that no drug testing was conducted, so it could be not be approved for a WR.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14502
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Postby Jon » Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:24 pm

Latest update after Berlin:

Men Outdoor:
100m - 9.58
200m - 19.19
400m - 43.99
800m - 1:43.88
1500m - 3:30.25
Mile - 3:49.84
3000m - 7:33.54
2 miles - 8:11.16
5000m - 12:46.53
Mar - 2:06:54
3000mSC - 7:59.65
110mH - 13.11
400mH - 47.91
HJ - 2.34
PV - 5.90
LJ - 8.54
TJ - 17.73
SP - 22.45
DT - 69.43
HT - 80.84
JT - 89.59
4x100m - 37.31
4x400m - 2:57.86

Men Indoor:
60m - 6.46
200m - 20.53
400m - 45.34
800m - 1:45.69
1000m - 2:14.96
1500m - 3:34.26
2000m - 4:49.99
3000m - 7:32.43
2 Miles - 8:04.35
5000m - 12:49.60
60mH - 7.36
HJ - 2.40
PV - 5.90
LJ - 8.40
TJ - 17.83
SP - 21.57
Hept - 6438
4x400 - 3:04.09

Women Outdoor:
100m - 10.73
200m - 22.02
400m - 49.00
800m - 1:55.45
1500m - 4:01.15
3000m - 8:29.55
5000m - 14:37.99
10000m - 29:59.20
Mar - 2:25:15
3000mSC - 9:07.32
100mH - 12.48
400mH - 52.42
HJ - 2.05
PV - 4.91
LJ - 7.10
TJ - 14.98
SP - 20.44
DT - 65.54
HT - 77.96
JT - 70.20
4x100m - 41.88
4x400m - 3:17.83

Women Indoor:
60m - 7.04
200m - 22.18
400m - 50.02
800m - 1:57.72
1000m - 2:32.96
1500m - 4:01.67
3000m - 8:30.53
60mH - 7.75
HJ - 2.05
PV - 4.90
LJ - 6.98
TJ - 15.36
SP - 20.55
Pent - 4948
4x400 - 3:23.88
Jon
 
Posts: 9176
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby gh » Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:46 pm

You're the first person I've heard so far who claims the Włodarczyk mark. Everybody else (me included) was occupied elsewhere.
gh
 
Posts: 43103
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby Powell » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:56 am

gh wrote:You're the first person I've heard so far who claims the Włodarczyk mark. Everybody else (me included) was occupied elsewhere.


I saw it, too :D
Powell
 
Posts: 8667
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Vanuatu

Postby gh » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:00 am

So we're clear, the rules of "seeing it" (at least in my universe) are that while you don't necessarily need to see the initation of the throw/jump, you need to see the takeoff/relase and the landing of the body/implement.

(as a sad PS I'll note that I saw neither, and that was a step down from Moreno's WR at the '05 meet when I only saw the landing)
gh
 
Posts: 43103
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby Powell » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:32 am

I saw the entire throw from initiation till landing. I had kept an eye on that competition in general and on Włodarczyk in particular (although I was sitting in the finish line sector, which wasn't great for watching the HT). Somehow, though, I missed her post-throw celebration and the injury.
Powell
 
Posts: 8667
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Vanuatu

Postby gh » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:23 am

I'm trying to remember why I didn't see it; things were amazingly hectic at that point. As I recall, both mPV and mLJ were at crucial junctures. And, if I'm not mistaken, didn't throw happen during the last lap (or even 200) of the w5000?

I talked to one guy (stop me if I posted this already!) who heard the German announcer yell "Weltrekord! Weltrekord!" and said, "no, dummy, that was 14:57, not 13:57!"
gh
 
Posts: 43103
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby optimistic » Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:50 am

You've all inspired me to actually try and go to a few pro-level track meets. Is there a thread on the best meets to go to as a spectator (my going to a pro-meet will have to coincide with a family/spouse vacation so that must be taken into account)?
optimistic
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Daisy » Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:28 am

optimistic wrote:my going to a pro-meet will have to coincide with a family/spouse vacation

Let's hope you don't like to vacation in Wisconsin.

Best I've been to are championship meets. Grand prix's are OK but do not have the same energy (although I've only been to Edinburgh and Crystal Palace and good meet in NYC). I always wanted to go to Bislet.

Indoor meets are good as you can be a little closer to the action, unless you're in the nose bleed seats at Madison Square Garden.
Daisy
 
Posts: 12722
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby gh » Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:01 pm

Oh darn.... several of my chief tormenters in this department now have an inferior women's PV to me. heh-heh-heh...
gh
 
Posts: 43103
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby Randy Treadway » Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:18 pm

As far as small meets go, there are a couple that stick out in my memory.

Houston McTear's 9.0 WR in the small schools section of a high school state championship was pretty amazing, given that it was so unexpected. When is the next time we're going to see a WR in a high school meet? Probably never.
And that I just happened to be there is equally amazing, in hindsight.

Then there was the Jav WR by a certain American/South African at the Pepsi Meet at UCLA, before many spectators have even arrived.
If I remember right they had balloons across the field marking the current WR, and his implement just kept sailing on and on, right over those balloons, without even popping any of them.

I saw one of those Eamonn Coghlan WR indoor miles in San Diego, and the crowd was really rocking.

I also officiated at one of the indoor meets at the L.A. Sports Arena, and was filling in as head PV judge for a fellow judge who was sick, when Bubka attempted a new indoor WR. Measuring beforehand for that was quite the challenge. :)
Unfortunately he didn't make it, but he still squashed the competition, even while putting ice packs on his achilles between every attempt. I might be remembering incorrectly, but I seem to remember that what he *did* clear that night was a U.S. all comers record (something the truly hard core keep track of)..

In some ways these memories are even more outstanding than seeing every heat, flight, and final at the '84 Olympics.
Randy Treadway
 
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby tandfman » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:09 pm

Randy Treadway wrote:Then there was the Jav WR by a certain American/South African at the Pepsi Meet at UCLA, before many spectators have even arrived.
If I remember right they had balloons across the field marking the current WR, and his implement just kept sailing on and on, right over those balloons, without even popping any of them.

I do remember nice balloons at that meet, now that you mention it. Purple, IIRC.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby mike renfro » Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:36 pm

gh wrote:You're the first person I've heard so far who claims the Włodarczyk mark. Everybody else (me included) was occupied elsewhere.


I was charting the event, and damn near missed it. I only saw the release, none of the spins. It was my 4th PB in the event, and I missed Heidler's Q mark completely. Did see Anna's. In all, I saw 10 marks better than the Moreno which was my old PB.
mike renfro
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: San Diego

Re: Spectator PR's

Postby mike renfro » Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:19 pm

Here is my list, updated from about '07 or so.

mike renfro wrote:
Men
100 9.58 WC '09
200 19.19 WC '09
400 43.65 WC '93
800 1:43.00 OG '84
1500 3:30.68 WC '01
3000SC 8:00.43 WC '09
5000 12:52.79 WC '03
10000 26:46.31 WC '09
110H 12.91 WC '93
400H 47.18 WC '93
4x100 37.31 WC '09
4x400 2:54.29 WC '93
HJ 2.40 WC '93
PV 6.05 WC '01
LJ 8.75 OT '88
TJ 17.97 TAC '85
SP 23.10 Jen '90
DT 71.26 TAC '84 (could have = @'85 Jen, didn't
get to the field in time)
HT 83.38 WC '01
JT 92.80 WC '01
Dec 8902 WC '01

Women
100 10.49 OT '88 (okay, my PR is probably 10.61)
200 21.74 WC '87
400 47.99 WC '83
800 1:54.44 W Cup '89
1500 3:57.12 US-Nord '83
3000SC 9:07.32 WC '09
5000 14:45.35 OT '00 (didn't pay enough attn at WC
H '03 to claim =)
10000 30:04.18 WC '03
100H 12.33 OT '00
400H 52.42 WC '09
4x100 41.49 WC '93
4x100 3:16.92 WC '93
HJ 2.09 WC '87
PV 4.92 OT '08
LJ 7.36 WC '87
TJ 15.25 WC '01
SP 21.81 US-DDR '83
DT 73.04 E Cup '89
HT 77.96 WC '09
JT 69.73 WC '01
Hep 7215 OT '88
Last edited by mike renfro on Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
mike renfro
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: San Diego

Postby gm » Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:49 pm

My updated list:

Men
9.77
19.62
43.44
1:42.80
3:28.37
7:25.54
13:00.77
27:04.20
8:00.67
12.92
47.03
37.40
2:54.29
2.40
6.05
8.70
17.92
22.54
69.72
83.38
92.80/new
8902

Women
10.71
21.85
49.27
1:55.43
3:56.97
8:29.25
14:45.35
30:19.39
9:27.59
12.33
52.74
41.49
3:16.71
2.01
4.92
7.20
15.25
??
68.57
70.78
69.53
7158

The ?? on the women's shot reinforces for me what a joke this event was in the past, with fairytale distances dominating the all-time list. It is hard to find a mark from the 90s, much less after that.
gm
 
Posts: 4355
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: "What's the pre-cooked weight on that lab?"

Postby tandfman » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:03 am

I've just done my annual update. See the first post on this thread. And yes, I was one of the many who sat there in Berlin watching the finish of the women's 5000 and completely missing the WR in the women's HT.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby westcoasttiger » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:41 pm

gh wrote:

So we're clear, the rules of "seeing it" (at least in my universe) are that while you don't necessarily need to see the initation of the throw/jump, you need to see the takeoff/relase and the landing of the body/implement.

(as a sad PS I'll note that I saw neither, and that was a step down from Moreno's WR at the '05 meet when I only saw the landing)

What about seeing it as I was distracted but still viewing the throw from spin to landing as I was being handed a beer and some food and then not aware of its significance for a minute or so as I was more entranced by the action on the track?
westcoasttiger
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby dl » Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:40 pm

I'll never catch up after missing Beijing and Berlin (although missing the '80's will leave one forever behind in the women's throws...)

9.72
19.62
43.18
1:41.11
2:13.93
3:27.40
3:45.19
4:49.00
7:55.72
7:25.16
12:39.74
26:25.97
12.91 (3 times)
47.03
37.48
2:54.29
2.40
6.05
8.74
18.29
22.54
71.06
84.12
92.80
8902 (didn't see all events)

10.70
21.76
48.89
1:54.01
2:28.98
3:56.74
4:12.56
5:31.52
9:06.57
8:24.51 (en route in 2Mile, 8:24.66 in actual 3000)
14:12.88
30:04.18
12.33
52.61
41.47
3:16.71
2.07
5.01
7.06
15.50
21.22
Discus - Nothing on IAAF all-time performances list down to 67.16!
75.20
71.70
7032 (didn't see all events)
dl
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:30 am

Postby gh » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:28 am

westcoasttiger wrote:....
What about seeing it as I was distracted but still viewing the throw from spin to landing as I was being handed a beer and some food and then not aware of its significance for a minute or so as I was more entranced by the action on the track?


I can live with that.
gh
 
Posts: 43103
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby tandfman » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:34 am

So can I, but the real question is whether westcoasttiger can. To me, this is a game played primarily for oneself. The object is simply to enhance the enjoyment one can derive from attending track meets. So westcoasttiger can make his own rules--until we make this a competitive sport, he's the only one who has to live with them.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby gh » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:08 am

dl wrote:I'll never catch up after missing Beijing and Berlin (although missing the '80's will leave one forever behind in the women's throws...).....
7032 (didn't see all events)


There have been many discussions as to what constitutes "seeing" a multi. Unless it's a multi-only meet, it's usually virtually impossible to see everything when there's a whole nother meet going on. For that one I've always accepted being in the stadium for each of the 10 events as good enough, so long as you watch the 100 and 1500.

The best definition, though, is, if Frank Zarnowski is in town and you ask him how it went. :-)
gh
 
Posts: 43103
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby tandfman » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:22 am

gh wrote:There have been many discussions as to what constitutes "seeing" a multi. Unless it's a multi-only meet, it's usually virtually impossible to see everything when there's a whole nother meet going on. For that one I've always accepted being in the stadium for each of the 10 events as good enough, so long as you watch the 100 and 1500.

Wow! You're tougher than I am. I've always counted a multi competition if I saw any of it. I think in most of the better ones I've witnessed, I've seen all or most of the events, but I never really keep track of how many or which ones.

Looking back at my PR's, I'm pretty sure I saw all of my Decathlon and Heptathlon outdoor PR performances, and I'm pretty sure I saw all of my indoor men's Hept PR, but probably not my indoor women's Pent PR.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby 7-sided » Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:29 am

A family member is infinitely better; missing only '05 for WC's and every olympics since '84... Anyway, my less impressive "personal views" below.

9.58
19.19
43.44
1:42.58
12:52.79
26:46.31
8:00.43
12.91
46.78
6.02
2.40
8.68
18.09
83.63
69.69
22.03
90.57
8790 (saw every event)
1:17:21 (not every step, but a significant amount and the finish)
3:36:03 (not every step, but a significant amount and the finish)
37.10
2:54.29

10.73
21.72
48.25
1:54.87
3:55.30
29:54.66
8:58.81
12.43
52.42
5.05
2.06
7.49
15.39
20.44
68.40
77.96
71.42
7044
1:26:31 (not every step, but a significant amount and the finish)
41.49
3:16.71
Last edited by 7-sided on Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
7-sided
 
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:02 am

Postby Pego » Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:45 am

Impressive resume, 7-sided. You omitted men's HJ, PV, SP,D, HT, women's SP, D. I assume, the walks you just ignored.
Pego
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby 7-sided » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:30 am

Pego, thanks, I didn't complete the list. By the way, I always end up watching the walks because after all this time...I can never figure out who should not be DQ'd. They all seem to be cheating.
7-sided
 
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:02 am

PreviousNext

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 26mi235, Bing [Bot], ExRun, Google [Bot], Jumpman, Letlôtse, Weights&Shoes and 25 guests