Why do you think Ato is not talking? Ya think it might be based upon the advice of legal counsel? His formal denial in emails to the media as been very weak. Zero evidence? This reminds me of Mo jumping up and down at the USATF meeting a couple of years back chanting "Zero Tolerance, Zero Tolerance." It seems that you are hoping that the allegations against Mo will be found to be untrue. I don't think that is very likely. Do you? What is likely is that this is just the tip of the iceberg regarding Mo and company. I guess we will all find out soon enough.
I am not gh, but I would like to address the above. First of all, why does Ato's talking or not talking necessarily signify anything in relation to whether he authored the letter? Second, what constitutes a weak denial? Third, gh appears to be more objective than you. Fourth, you appear to be conflating two issues, the first of which relates to this letter and Boldon's potential involvement in concocting it, and second, allegations regarding Maurice Green, which apparently exist independently of this letter you are so convinced Boldon authored. The fact that one does not necessarily believe everything one reads is not tantamount to a lack of objectivity. What evidence do you have that Boldon wrote this letter?