doping: a modest proposal for a statute of limitations
76 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
a. Agreed b. I don't know, you seemed to deny Marion Jones was doped right til the end. Rose tinted glasses and all that. c. No we do not. Not every athlete is mentioned, there is no record of certain athletes - fact. If you are making the assumption that every GDR athlete was doped because some are mentioned in government files, then we can just as easily assume that every American woman sprinter is doped because of Jones, White, Gaines, Edwards, Jenkins etc. At the very least that any athlete that has been coached by their coach is/was doped, no? d. Oh I don't know, some are blindingly obvious. e. Yes.
Are these the same EG women that were beaten by a 'clean' Ashford, a 'clean' Brisco, a 'clean' JJK, a 'clean' Flo Jo? Is 7,291 really a 'true' mark and 47.60 a 'false' mark?
As soon as you show me the proof that the others were dirty. That's exactly what I said about Marion also. When the proof came, I believed it. As it stands know, everyone else is in the same boat: 'not guilty'. Except the DDR women whom we know weren't.
Right, so 7,291 is a clean, un-aided human feat in your eyes? What EG women do you know that were doped? Tell me which ones are mentioned in the stasi files please - all of them? I think you'll find they're not all mentioned. Do you know which ones are and which ones aren't? I'd say you don't. I'd say you have read somewhere that x has been, and so you have assumed there is evidence that all the women were doped, without there actually being the evidence. The fact is we do not know that ALL EG women were doped, because the evidence does not exist that shows they all were - fact.
76 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |