Return to Current Events

Spectator PR's

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Postby kuha » Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:16 am

"wonder how all of ours would look if we eliminated Worlds/OG/GP meets"

In other words, you're asking: "I wonder how all of ours would look if we never went to any good meets?"

Answer: Pretty pathetic.
kuha
 
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Postby gh » Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:29 am

SQUACKEE wrote:hey everybody, what about best highschool marks you witnessed.

4:05 mile
1:48 1/2 mile
8:55 2 mile
195 ft discus
whatever dwight stones jumped to win calif. state meet


I've got a stat-nutty friend (who doesn't post here) who keeps an ongoing list of the 50 fastest high school miles he has ever seen.
gh
 
Posts: 43141
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby gm » Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:20 pm

kuha wrote:"wonder how all of ours would look if we eliminated Worlds/OG/GP meets"

In other words, you're asking: "I wonder how all of ours would look if we never went to any good meets?"

Answer: Pretty pathetic.


Not necessarily! You still have the Euros, Pan Ams, etc., along with a host of non-GP meets with plenty of great marks.
gm
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: "What's the pre-cooked weight on that lab?"

Postby kuha » Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:33 pm

"Not necessarily! You still have the Euros, Pan Ams, etc., along with a host of non-GP meets with plenty of great marks."

"Plenty of great marks"??? I'd suggest that a look at the all-time list would not really support this view. How many top marks have we seen in the last few Pan-Am Games, for example? In fact, how does the entire history of the Pan-Ams match up to, say, any two Zurich meets from the last dozen years?
kuha
 
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Postby gm » Thu Dec 08, 2005 6:59 pm

Being as how many, if not most, of the people who read this board will never be able to attend one of those nifty European GP meets, it seems interesting to me who has seen the best "non" marks.

Hell, with enough cash anyone can go to Zurich and see a bunch of superior marks every year. I'm always more impressed by that "Wow!" performance that comes in an unexpected place.
gm
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: "What's the pre-cooked weight on that lab?"

Postby DentyCracker » Thu Dec 08, 2005 7:49 pm

Men
9.86 Powell
20.31 Bolt
44.27 Pettigrew
1.45.74 Watson or Morgan
13.48 Wignall
8.29 Beckford
17.xx Beckford
2.30 Hemingway

Women
10.96 V.Campbell
22.17 V.Campbell
50.11 J. Campbell
12.50 Devers
6.86 Golding
14.74 Smith
DentyCracker
 
Posts: 1580
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Jamaica

Postby kuha » Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:59 am

"Hell, with enough cash anyone can go to Zurich and see a bunch of superior marks every year. I'm always more impressed by that "Wow!" performance that comes in an unexpected place."

I humbly admit that you are completely correct. What is the point in making any effort to see superior marks? Why bother going to Europe to see good meets? All it takes is money, after all! Where's the challenge in that? The best idea: stay in one place, keep your head in the sand, and let the great performances come to YOU. Yeah! That's the ticket!!
kuha
 
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Postby gm » Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:40 am

kuha wrote:"Hell, with enough cash anyone can go to Zurich and see a bunch of superior marks every year. I'm always more impressed by that "Wow!" performance that comes in an unexpected place."

I humbly admit that you are completely correct. What is the point in making any effort to see superior marks? Why bother going to Europe to see good meets? All it takes is money, after all! Where's the challenge in that? The best idea: stay in one place, keep your head in the sand, and let the great performances come to YOU. Yeah! That's the ticket!!


Hey, to each his own, I say. You keep your snobby, elitist, money-fueled list and I'll stick with my "everyman" list :lol: Glad to know you are wealthy enough to make all the big meets.

That does bring up a good question for the masses (using that term loosely) who populate this board -- how many of you have ever been to a Golden League meet?
gm
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: "What's the pre-cooked weight on that lab?"

Postby kuha » Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:05 am

No, I honestly don't think it's a matter of being snobby or elitist. If you are really interested in art, then with some regularity you take the time and effort to go to the world's great museums. If you are really interested in music, then with some regularity you take the time and effort to hear the best musicians. If you are really interested in high level track and field, then with some regularity you take the time and effort to see the best performers in the best meets. That's about it...
kuha
 
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Postby Jon » Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:01 am

gm wrote:how many of you have ever been to a Golden League meet?


Yup, Rome 2004.
Jon
 
Posts: 9176
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby mojo » Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:13 am

Jon wrote:
gm wrote:how many of you have ever been to a Golden League meet?


Yup, Rome 2004.


Another elitist checks in. :twisted: :twisted:











:wink:

I wanna be an elitist! :cry:
mojo
 
Posts: 5519
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: at the finish line freezing my butt off

Postby marknhj » Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:09 am

Had to do some research but here are the mens I can positively identify:

9.86
19.80
43.66
13.00.41
12.97
47.24
2.36m
8.66m
17.78m
22.52m
8847
marknhj
 
Posts: 5014
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Oldtimer » Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:22 am

quote="Jon"]
gm wrote:how many of you have ever been to a Golden League meet?


Elitist here...
30+ for me, including when it was just the Golden 4.
Oldtimer
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby mike renfro » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:42 pm

[/quote]- how many of you have ever been to a Golden League meet?[/quote]

Not I. I attended Zurich Weltklasse in '81 & '87, but that was WAY prior to GL..
I would like to do a vacation in Belgium/Netherlands wrapped around Van Damme.
mike renfro
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: San Diego

Postby SQUACKEE » Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:11 pm

gm wrote:
kuha wrote:"Hell, with enough cash anyone can go to Zurich and see a bunch of superior marks every year. I'm always more impressed by that "Wow!" performance that comes in an unexpected place."

I humbly admit that you are completely correct. What is the point in making any effort to see superior marks? Why bother going to Europe to see good meets? All it takes is money, after all! Where's the challenge in that? The best idea: stay in one place, keep your head in the sand, and let the great performances come to YOU. Yeah! That's the ticket!!


Hey, to each his own, I say. You keep your snobby, elitist, money-fueled list and I'll stick with my "everyman" list :lol: Glad to know you are wealthy enough to make all the big meets.

That does bring up a good question for the masses (using that term loosely) who populate this board -- how many of you have ever been to a Golden League meet?


there once was a warm and unassuming track fan who made the effort to journey to a faraway land to witness the greatest, the fastest and the strongest. when he made his way back he kindly sought to share his wonderful memories with like minded souls. to his surprise not everyone was happy to hear what a wonderous time he had experienced. some called him a snob and an elitist. some were jealous but he kept posting because he knew there were kindred spirits who even though they had never ventured to such faraway lands, marveled and appreciated every word.
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12873
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Postby bad hammy » Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:16 pm

SQUACKEE wrote:some were jealous but he kept posting because he knew there were kindred spirits who even though they had never ventured to such faraway lands, marveled and appreciated every word.

I am envious, not jealous. If I had the resources I’d be sitting in the stands with kuha every time.
bad hammy
 
Posts: 10836
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby SQUACKEE » Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:54 pm

bad hammy wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:some were jealous but he kept posting because he knew there were kindred spirits who even though they had never ventured to such faraway lands, marveled and appreciated every word.

I am envious, not jealous. If I had the resources I’d be sitting in the stands with kuha every time.


me also. i might ask the rich bastard to buy me a brat wurst and bier, bitter. und snell!!
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12873
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Postby gm » Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:23 pm

Guess the tongue was much too firmly in cheek :?

I was trying to elicit responses from those here who maybe don't have the wherewithal to get to OG/WC/GL meets. I would really be interested, for example, in what the best "non-major" performance witnessed by Mark would be. Something at a CG, maybe, or a British league meet, etc. Or someone who has been to a bunch of NCAA champs.

One of my best memories at a non-major is the 8.14 LJ by then-junior Sheddric Fields at a small meet in Cwmbran on a U.S. "B" team tour.
gm
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: "What's the pre-cooked weight on that lab?"

Postby Bob H » Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:51 pm

gm wrote:One of my best memories at a non-major is the 8.14 LJ by then-junior Sheddric Fields at a small meet in Cwmbran on a U.S. "B" team tour.

One of my best memories of a non-major was the 2.33m (7-7 3/4) high jump of Vladimir Yashchenko in the 1977 US-USSR Junior dual meet. That jump broke Dwight Stones's World Record--not exactly what anyone expected to see at a junior meet held at a local track in Richmond, VA.
Bob H
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby gh » Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:16 am

Dang---my 100 PR just dropped to 9.80.
gh
 
Posts: 43141
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:22 am

My small meet marks of note include:

8:46 3000 from SFH at the UW May Twilight meet (about 2000?)

~60m jav at the Big Tens (2003?),

2:01i or 2:02i (probably) from Amy Wickus two months before she set the Collegiate record in Indy

And four that I had the opportunity to witness as an official:

4.10m PV from a (former) walk-on at UW May Twilight meet,

1.78 HJ at a JO regional meet from an Intermediate (I think) athlete with an entry mark nowhere close, and this one I got to officiate

2.27i in the HJ at the UW indoor Invite from someone 5'10" (J. Fischer) and this one I got to officiate

~18' 5" in the Deca PV (might have been only 18' 1" made, 18' 5" attempted) at Big Tens.


The only big meet was the Big Tens, but I did not expect just about the best US mark of the year (or one of the best of the millenium).
26mi235
 
Posts: 14561
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Postby tandfman » Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:26 pm

Since I won't be going to any more track meets this year, I've just done my annual update. My list of spectator PR's appears in the first post of this thread. If you have not previously read the message above the list, please do. The whole point of the exercise is really not the list--it's the message. If you go to track meets and don't keep your own personal list of spectator PR's, you're missing a fun way to enhance your enjoyment of the sport and of the meets that you do attend.
Last edited by tandfman on Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby pv22' » Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:06 pm

My PRs surely cant compare but the awe I felt?

1986 Mt.Sac (I think,I was 13)

Billy Olson,Joe Dial and Earl Bell.

Saw The KING win the 100m (I think).

The thing I remember most was standing near the hot dog stand and Earl ran by me towards the bathroom..."WOW! HE is tall!"

The next year I went to a Dec invatational near Stuttgart. My mom went up to Hissegen and got his autograph for me. And hit on her!!!!! Man, I should whooped his a$$!!!! LOL!
pv22'
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby tandfman » Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:24 pm

The Mile PR thread that was opened today reminded me that I haven't yet done my annual bump of this thread. If you're new here, take a look at the first post on the thread--not just the marks but the message as well.

I'll say again (as I think I do every year) that keeping track of your own spectator PR's really can add to the enjoyment you get from going to track meets. I know it has added to mine.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby Jon » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:15 pm

Latest update, as of Sep 2008. Very few additions (in bold) this season unfortunately :?

Men Outdoor:
100m - 9.77
200m - 19.84
400m - 43.99
800m - 1:43.88
1500m - 3:30.25
Mile - 3:49.84
3000m - 7:33.54
2 miles - 8:11.16
5000m - 12:46.53
Mar - 2:10:54
3000mSC - 7:59.65
110mH - 13.11
400mH - 48.35
HJ - 2.34
PV - 5.90
LJ - 8.45
TJ - 17.65
SP - 22.45
DT - 69.22
HT - 79.31
JT - 87.59
4x100m - 38.30
4x400m - 3:01.70

Men Indoor:
60m - 6.46
200m - 20.53
400m - 45.34
800m - 1:45.69
1000m - 2:14.96 WR
1500m - 3:34.26
2000m - 4:49.99 WR
3000m - 7:32.43
2 Miles - 8:04.35 WR
5000m - 12:49.60 WR
60mH - 7.36
HJ - 2.40
PV - 5.90
LJ - 8.40
TJ - 17.83 WR
SP - 21.57
Hept - 6438
4x400 - 3:04.09

Women Outdoor:
100m - 11.00 (10.89w)
200m - 22.25
400m - 49.05
800m - 1:57.22
1500m - 4:01.15
3000m - 8:29.55
5000m - 14:37.99
10000m - 30:17.15
Mar - 2:34:35
3000mSC - 9:40.95
100mH - 12.57
400mH - 54.04
HJ - 2.05
PV - 4.91
LJ - 7.01
TJ - 14.98
SP - 19.69
DT - 65.54
HT - 76.50
JT - 70.20
4x100m - 42.78
4x400m - 3:23.51

Women Indoor:
60m - 7.04
200m - 22.18
400m - 50.02
800m - 1:57.72
1000m - 2:32.96
1500m - 4:01.67
3000m - 8:31.94
60mH - 7.75
HJ - 2.05
PV - 4.90 WR
LJ - 6.98
TJ - 15.36 WR
SP - 20.55
Pent - 4948
4x400 - 3:23.88 WR
Last edited by Jon on Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:30 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Jon
 
Posts: 9176
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby lonewolf » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:37 pm

I have never compiled a list of the best performances I have witnessed and may be too far behind to start now but have a questions about the ground rules.
If one is officiating another event concurrent with an exceptional performance in another event but duties prevented actually observing the event, does it count?
lonewolf
 
Posts: 8002
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Indian Territory

Postby tandfman » Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:32 pm

lonewolf wrote:I have never compiled a list of the best performances I have witnessed and may be too far behind to start now but have a questions about the ground rules.
If one is officiating another event concurrent with an exceptional performance in another event but duties prevented actually observing the event, does it count?

Everyone I know who keep track of this sort of thing says that you have to have seen at least part of the performance in question. I'd count a field event performance that occurred during a 5000m race provided that my attention had been diverted to the field event and I'd actually seen it. I'd also count the 5,000m performance even though I hadn't seen every step of the race. But if I were officiating a long jump and someone threw a discus behind my back and I never saw an instant of the throw, I would not count it. (I've missed several PR's in field events at meets I've attended when I simply did not see the throw or jump for various reasons. Obviously, I try not to let that happen and I'm not happy when it does.)

At the end of the day, though, there are no rules. Nobody scores it. You don't get penalized if you cheat. It's a matter that you must decide. You have to figure out what your rules will be and then you have to live with them. Remember that the whole purpose of the exercise is to add a new dimension to the experience of going to a track meet and seeing great performances. If it makes you feel better to count things you haven't seen as long as you were in the arena at the time, go right ahead. And if you want to keep two sets of PR's, one limited to things you actually saw, that's ok too.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Spectator PR's

Postby jazzcyclist » Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:08 pm

gh wrote:Men
100 – 9.78*

Is this a typo or do I not understand what the asterisk means?
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 9441
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Spectator PR's

Postby Daisy » Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:10 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:
gh wrote:Men
100 – 9.78*

Is this a typo or do I not understand what the asterisk means?


I assume it's Tim Montgomery, hence the asterisk.
Daisy
 
Posts: 12726
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Spectator PR's

Postby tandfman » Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:07 am

Daisy wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:
gh wrote:Men
100 – 9.78*

Is this a typo or do I not understand what the asterisk means?

I assume it's Tim Montgomery, hence the asterisk.

The asterisk indicates that the time is a world record, which it was when he posted it. It appears that gh hasn't updated his PR list since 2004 (at least not the one on this thread), although I'm sure he's seen some PR's since then. I saw the Montgomery 9.78 too, but when that mark was erased from the books, I amended my list to delete it.
tandfman
 
Posts: 14341
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby br » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:08 am

MEN

9.82
Greene - Edmonton '01
19.32
Johnson - Atlanta '96
43.39
Johnson - Goteborg '95
1:41.24
Kipketer - Zurich '97
3:26.12
El G - Brussels '01
3:44.90
El G - Oslo '97
7:23.09
El G - Brussels '99
7:53.63
Saidi-Sief - Brussels '04
12:39.74
Komen - Brussels '97
26.27.85
Tergat - Brussels '97
12.88
Liu - Lausanne '06
46.78
Young - Barcelona '92
37.40
USA - Barcelona '92, Stuttgart '93
2:54.29
USA - Stuttgart '93
2.40
Austin - Zurich '91
6.02
Bubka - Atlanta '96
8.71
Lewis - Westwood '84
18.29
Edwards - Goteborg '95
23.12
Barnes - Westwood '90
71.26
Powell - San Jose '84
83.38
Ziolkowski - Edmonton '01
92.80
Zelezny - Edmonton '01
8902
Dvorak - Edmonton '01

WOMEN

10.76
Jones - Monaco '98
21.72
Torrence - Barcelona '92
48.25
Perec - Atlanta '96
1:55.43
Mutola - Stuttgart '93
3:55.30
Boulmerka - Barcelona '92
4:12.56
Masterkova - Zurich '96
8:21.42
Szabo - Monaco '02
9:06.57
Volkova - Osaka '07
14:29.32
Yegorova - Berlin '01
30:04.18
Adere - Paris '03
12.33
Devers - Sacramento '00
52.61
Batten - Goteborg '95
2.06
Cloete - Paris '03
5.01
Isinbaeva - Helsinki '05
7.33
Drechsler - Monaco '92
15.50
Kravets - Goteborg '95
21.22
Kumbernuss - Göteborg 95
71.22
Stalman - Walnut '84
75.10
Kuzenkova - Helsinki '05
71.70
Menendez - Helsinki '05
7032
Kluft - Osaka '07


You got me thinking, so I added the athlete and city.
Last edited by br on Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
br
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby 26mi235 » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:42 am

It is easy to see some of the places that you have been (Osaka 2007, Atlanta 1996, etc).
26mi235
 
Posts: 14561
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Postby observer2 » Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:15 pm

Men:

100m: 9,80 - Greene, Seville 99
200 m: 19,77 - M Johnson, Stockholm 96
400 m: 43.18 - M Johnson, Seville 99 -WR
800 m: 1.41.87 - W Kipketer, Stockholm 97 -WR (e)
1500 m: 3.26,45 - El Guerrouj, Zurich 98
5000 m: 12.39.74 - Daniel Komen, Brussels 97 -WR
10000 m: 26.27.85 - Paul Tergat, Brussels 97 -WR
3000 m SC: 7.59.08 - Wilson Boit Kipketer, Zurich 97
110 h: 12.92 - Roger Kingdom, Zurich 89 -WR
400 h: 47.17 - Edwin Moses, Berlin 80
HJ: 2.42 - P Sjöberg, Stockholm 87 -WR
PV: 6.10 - Bubka, Malmö 91 -WR
LJ: 8.70 - Pedroso, Göteborg 95
TJ: 18.29 - Edwards, Göteborg 95 -WR
SP: 22.84 - Randy Barnes, Malmö 90
DT: 71.06 - Lars Riedel, Zurich 96 (72.34 Ben Plucknett, Stockholm 81)
HT: 82.90 - Yuriy Sedykh, Stuttgart 86
JT: 92.60 - Raymond Hecht, Oslo 96
Decathlon: - 8811 Daley Thomson, Stuttgart 86

Women:

100 m: 10.70 - Marion Jones, Seville 99
200 m: 21.66 - Marlene Ottey, Zurich 90
400 m: 48.22 - Marita Koch, Stuttgart 86
800 m: 1.54.44 - Ana Fidelia Quirot, Barcelona 89
1500 m: 3.55.0 - T Kazankina, Moscow 80 -WR
5000 m: 14.37.33 - Ingrid Kristiansen, Stockholm 86 -WR
10000 m: 30.23.25 - Ingrid Kristiansen, Stuttgart 86
100 m h: 12.37 - Gail Devers, Seville 99
400 m h: 52.61 - Kim Batten, Göteborg 95 -WR
HJ: 2.07 - Blanka Vlasic, Stockholm 07
PV: 4.87 - Y Isinbayeva, Stuttgart 07
LJ: 7.27 - Heike Dreschler, Stuttgart 86
TJ: 15.50 - I Kravets, Göteborg 95 -WR
SP: 21.22 - A Kumbernuss, Göteborg 95
DT: 68.64 - Margitta Pufe, Berlin 79
HT: 75.20 - M Melinte, Seville 99
JT: 68.32 - T Hettestad, Berlin 00
Heptathlon: - 6861: E Barber, Seville 99
observer2
 
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:47 am

Postby Bob H » Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:19 pm

Bob H wrote:I've got one that I suspect nobody on the Board can match, in any event. I've seen the 20 best men's 4x400m performances in history. Of the 101 sub-3 minute performances ever, I witnessed 89.

I haven't updated this in nearly four years, so here goes. I've now seen the 23 best men's 4x400m performances in history. Of the 111 sub-3 minute performances ever, I've witnessed 98.
Bob H
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Spectator PR's

Postby berkeley » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:57 pm

tandfman wrote:
Daisy wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:
gh wrote:Men
100 – 9.78*

Is this a typo or do I not understand what the asterisk means?

I assume it's Tim Montgomery, hence the asterisk.

The asterisk indicates that the time is a world record, which it was when he posted it. It appears that gh hasn't updated his PR list since 2004 (at least not the one on this thread), although I'm sure he's seen some PR's since then. I saw the Montgomery 9.78 too, but when that mark was erased from the books, I amended my list to delete it.


... or maybe he can just change it to Greene's windy 9.78, Stanford 2003. I'm pretty sure gh was there.
berkeley
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: San Jose, CA

PreviousNext

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 26mi235, Bing [Bot], iain, k3ck3c, lionelp1, Rog, t_monk and 21 guests