Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.


Normally open July 4th only---the one day a year when partisan politics, religion, etc. are acceptable topics on this Board (within reason). The forum is now closed.

Postby TrackDaddy » Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:52 pm

gh wrote:<<6. Doesn't being gay stand against the natural order of things to procreate? And therefore opposes the sustenance of the familial infrastructure of mankind and consequently the species? Is it rational to support that? >>

I'm a raging heterosexual (as is my wife). Neither of us have the slightest inclination towards procreation, as much as we enjoy practicing. Sorry, we don't have the breeder gene. I guess that means you wouldn't "support" us.

Conversely, we have gay friends with a raging desire for children. And gays, just like heteros, practice adoption, surrogate parenthood, in vitro fertilzation, you name it.

Gays are hardly opposed to procreation; they just don't like to do the same way you do. Ostracizing them for that is no different than so doing for race, color or creed.


If gays are not opposed to procreation they have a funny way of showing it.

The ONLY way to do it (procreate) is the way I do it (male/female).

Gay is not a gender, race, a color or a creed. By their own description its a sexual "preference" which CLEARLY indicates CHOICE. Maybe heterosexuality isnt their preference, but then that is their choice.

It's a an inordinate lust because its less common. Unlike heterosexuality it has no other benefit than gratification of a deviant (not derogatry, but meaning against the norm) nature.

Like pedophilia or bestiality...its not given to majority inclination.

Also, just because someone is inclined to do something doesnt mean that its a good idea.

Like gossiping, overeating, lying, or an attraction to children. Whether you feel you are born that way or not...is that an excuse to give in to those desires?

If so, why cant we (victims aside) be more understanding and compassionate toward pedophiles, for example? I mean they cant help it right? They were born that way like gay people....Right? Why do we expect them to control their desires if we say that it cant be done? Arent they victims of an inherent desire? Arent people who like to sleep with animals in the same boat?

Much like necrophilia, pedophilia and bestiality....homosexuality has no social or procreative benefit beyond deviant gratification and therefore should categorized with them.

It should not be categorized or compared with heterosexuality, which obviously has other innate benefits that support the sustenance of the species.
TrackDaddy
 
Posts: 4785
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:06 pm
Location: The Command Post

Postby gh » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:10 pm

Sorry to hear your mind is still in the dark ages.
gh
 
Posts: 46322
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Postby AthleticsInBritain » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:12 pm

If one more ignorant fucker compares gays to paedophiles one more time I swear I'm going to go postal. How dare you compare me to something like that??

Trackdaddy, get it into your thick head that IT. IS. NOT. A. CHOICE!!! You think I would CHOOSE to be something that attracts this kind of bullshit day in day out????

Whether you feel you are born that way or not...is that an excuse to give in to those desires?


So consenting adults are supposed to stay celibate our whole lives, even though what we do doesn't harm anyone or anything except your delicate intolerant sensibilities? I don't think so.

I'm ending this rant now to save my blood pressure.
AthleticsInBritain
 
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:01 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby STL_Runner » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:20 pm

TrackDaddy wrote:If so, why cant we (victims aside) be more understanding and compassionate toward pedophiles, for example? I mean they cant help it right? They were born that way like gay people....Right? Why do we expect them to control their desires if we say that it cant be done? Arent they victims of an inherent desire? Arent people who like to sleep with animals in the same boat?

Much like necrophilia, pedophilia and bestiality....homosexuality has no social or procreative benefit beyond deviant gratification and therefore should categorized with them.

It should not be categorized or compared with heterosexuality, which obviously has other innate benefits that support the sustenance of the species.


Pedophiles have VICTIMS, chicken-screwers have VICTIMS. Who are the VICTIMS in a homosexual relationship?
STL_Runner
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Pego » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:30 pm

I have a couple of questions for TrackDaddy. Just one question, really, the other one is an observation.

If, as you claim, homosexuality is a choice, that means we all could choose it, right? So, would you blow a guy. No? I thought so.

You have made a few insightful observations about history of discrimination against African-Americans. Yet, you seem to have no problem arguing for discrimination of immigrants that are not English speakers, or homosexuals in this debate. Don't even try an argument that it is not the same. Discrimination is discrimination.
Pego
 
Posts: 10198
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby Marlow » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:52 pm

TrackDaddy wrote:It's a an inordinate lust
it has no other benefit [than] gratification of a deviant nature.
Like pedophilia or bestiality - gossiping, overeating, lying, or an attraction to children. . . . necrophilia, pedophilia and bestiality.

That about sums it up! I'm convinced! :roll:
Marlow
 
Posts: 21088
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Postby STL_Runner » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:52 pm

Pego wrote:If, as you claim, homosexuality is a choice, that means we all could choose it, right? So, would you blow a guy. No? I thought so.


I've got a pretty good memory, yet I can't remember the exact date I CHOSE to be a heterosexual. None of my gay friends seem to be able to remember the day they CHOSE to be a homosexual either.
STL_Runner
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Seeksreal » Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:13 pm

TrackDaddy, you should not make absolute statements about issues you don't understand. Being gay is NOT a sexual preference. It is a sexual orientation. Nor is it a fetish! It doesn't stem from the same part of the psyche as fetishes do. I can speak with authority on this subject as both a gay man and a documentary filmmaker who has made one of the most in-depth documentary features on BDSM/kink/fetish in the past decade. I personally get offended when my sexual orientation is being reduced to a "preference" by ignorant straight people. If you are not gay, you can't understand it fully!! It is as much a part of me as my race or gender. I'm sure most black people feel that a white person can't understand what it is like to be black because they haven't had that experience. The same holds true for sexual orientation.
Seeksreal
 
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:31 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest