Obama's speech in Cairo


Normally open July 4th only---the one day a year when partisan politics, religion, etc. are acceptable topics on this Board (within reason). The forum is now closed.

Postby Daisy » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:34 am

Followers of David Irving, I presume.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:12 am

Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:I watched the "Rachel Maddows" Show yesterday and I think Obama should have stated that no one is doubting the Holocaust took place just that ppl want an accurate count of how many died at the hands of Hitler.Ppl are starting to doubt the historical figure of 6 million.


What's "ppl"?
People and Obama should have mentioned the Nabka to let the world know the plight of the Arabs and Palestinians everyone knows about the jews and the holocaust but not enough of the world knows about the Nabka and the effects that it has on the aformentioned Arabs and Palestine.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:27 am

Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby jazzcyclist » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:34 am

lonewolf wrote:I can't hold it till free speech month. :x
Am I the only person here who is not enchanted by Obama and is alarmed by his politcs or is it I am the only one not afraid to dissent?
Apparently praising Obama is not politcal but criticizing him is???? :?

I don't think there's anything wrong with you. You're just the product of your times. As a matter of fact, based on the demographics of the exit polls, you would be an outlier if you were enchanted by Obama.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 10860
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Daisy » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:42 am

dal4018 wrote:I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest

I'm not familiar with Williamson, is there a significant difference in his perspective compared to Irving?
Last edited by Daisy on Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby jazzcyclist » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:45 am

dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.

Whether it was 6 million, 5.4 million (a more precise figure that I've read) or some other figure, what difference does it make? Once you get into the millions, why quibble over a few hundred thousand. Pol Pot killed 3 million while Stalin is supposed to be responsible for the death of 20 million. All of these men were equally evil in my book. Even if some day in the future, reputable historians revised the six million figure down to five million, I don't think it would lessen the significance of the Holocaust.
jazzcyclist
 
Posts: 10860
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby ndamix » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:02 pm

Hey Blues...glad all is well with you. PS06 here.

A long overdue & plain spoken speech that was partially heart & ideologically felt. President Obama said some things that both sides needed to hear and I think what was said will reasonate well with folks.

Now if the politicians can actually come to some sort of plan of action that will enable and empower both sides as opposed to ostarcizing folks....that'll be the true test.
ndamix
 
Posts: 755
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Where I Have My Eye On You

Postby ndamix » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:05 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.

Whether it was 6 million, 5.4 million (a more precise figure that I've read) or some other figure, what difference does it make? Once you get into the millions, why quibble over a few hundred thousand. Pol Pot killed 3 million while Stalin is supposed to be responsible for the death of 20 million. All of these men were equally evil in my book. Even if some day in the future, reputable historians revised the six million figure down to five million, I don't think it would lessen the significance of the Holocaust.
Thank you.
ndamix
 
Posts: 755
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Where I Have My Eye On You

Postby SQUACKEE » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:08 pm

jazzcyclist wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.

Whether it was 6 million, 5.4 million (a more precise figure that I've read) or some other figure, what difference does it make? Once you get into the millions, why quibble over a few hundred thousand. Pol Pot killed 3 million while Stalin is supposed to be responsible for the death of 20 million. All of these men were equally evil in my book. Even if some day in the future, reputable historians revised the six million figure down to five million, I don't think it would lessen the significance of the Holocaust.


Eggsactly- imagine someone saying Stalin is worse than Hitler cause Hitler only killed 5-6 million. They are both equal monsters. Hitler would have killed a billion Jews if he had the opportunity.
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12885
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:08 pm

Daisy wrote:
dal4018 wrote:I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest

I'm not familiar with Williamson, is there a significant difference in his perspective compared to Irving?
As stated before he's a Catholic priest who doesn't believe the historical figure of 6 million that's been handed down thru the history books Williams isn't denying what happened that's the difference between him and Irving.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:13 pm

SQUACKEE wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.

Whether it was 6 million, 5.4 million (a more precise figure that I've read) or some other figure, what difference does it make? Once you get into the millions, why quibble over a few hundred thousand. Pol Pot killed 3 million while Stalin is supposed to be responsible for the death of 20 million. All of these men were equally evil in my book. Even if some day in the future, reputable historians revised the six million figure down to five million, I don't think it would lessen the significance of the Holocaust.


Eggsactly- imagine someone saying Stalin is worse than Hitler cause Hitler only killed 5-6 million. They are both equal monsters. Hitler would have killed a billion Jews if he had the opportunity.
Hey in a sense Stalin was worse than Hitler but the history books only recognize Hitler and his evil deeds,Stalin was reponsible for the deaths of 40 million innocent people but no one talks about it in the same fashion as they would Hitler.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Pego » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:15 pm

dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.


There is a lot of things, people believe. Flat earth, time travel, all sorts of nonsense. Williams is a Holocaust denier that got the Pope a lot of heat. As jazzcyclist said, 6 million, or 5 makes no difference in judging the monstrosity of it. Williams denies, it ever happened.
Pego
 
Posts: 10203
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:18 pm

Obama said in his speech that we shouldn't be prisoners to the past we shouldn't forget it either someone once said"Those who forget the past are bound to repeat it" and "If you don't know your past you will not know your future"Both statements were made by MLK Jr.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Pego » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:18 pm

dal4018 wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.

Whether it was 6 million, 5.4 million (a more precise figure that I've read) or some other figure, what difference does it make? Once you get into the millions, why quibble over a few hundred thousand. Pol Pot killed 3 million while Stalin is supposed to be responsible for the death of 20 million. All of these men were equally evil in my book. Even if some day in the future, reputable historians revised the six million figure down to five million, I don't think it would lessen the significance of the Holocaust.


Eggsactly- imagine someone saying Stalin is worse than Hitler cause Hitler only killed 5-6 million. They are both equal monsters. Hitler would have killed a billion Jews if he had the opportunity.
Hey in a sense Stalin was worse than Hitler but the history books only recognize Hitler and his evil deeds,Stalin was reponsible for the deaths of 40 million innocent people but no one talks about it in the same fashion as they would Hitler.


Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Pego
 
Posts: 10203
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby williamwindhamjr » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:20 pm

If someone is alarmed at Obamas politics,then where were you when Bush was screwing our country using sandpaper for a condom.We need to worry about some of these nuts we have in this country,but Im glad he is trying to bridge the gap of hatred in the world.
williamwindhamjr
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:47 pm

Postby Pego » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:20 pm

dal4018 wrote:Obama said in his speech that we shouldn't be prisoners to the past we shouldn't forget it either someone once said"Those who forget the past are bound to repeat it" and "If you don't know your past you will not know your future"Both statements were made by MLK Jr.


Wrong again.

GEORGE SANTAYANA: "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Pego
 
Posts: 10203
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:21 pm

Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:
jazzcyclist wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:Followers of David Irving, I presume.
No Daisy me personally I follow Richard Williams the Catholic priest when it comes to the Holocaust he doesn't believe that historic figure of 6 million that has been drummed into the collective conscience of the world he as I would like a truly accurate count of how many truly died at the hands of Hitler &company.

Whether it was 6 million, 5.4 million (a more precise figure that I've read) or some other figure, what difference does it make? Once you get into the millions, why quibble over a few hundred thousand. Pol Pot killed 3 million while Stalin is supposed to be responsible for the death of 20 million. All of these men were equally evil in my book. Even if some day in the future, reputable historians revised the six million figure down to five million, I don't think it would lessen the significance of the Holocaust.


Eggsactly- imagine someone saying Stalin is worse than Hitler cause Hitler only killed 5-6 million. They are both equal monsters. Hitler would have killed a billion Jews if he had the opportunity.
Hey in a sense Stalin was worse than Hitler but the history books only recognize Hitler and his evil deeds,Stalin was reponsible for the deaths of 40 million innocent people but no one talks about it in the same fashion as they would Hitler.


Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Daisy » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:23 pm

dal4018 wrote:As stated before he's a Catholic priest

You mean was a priest, he was excommunicated.

dal4018 wrote:Williams isn't denying what happened that's the difference between him and Irving.


Williamson and Irving are in cahoots, I see no clear distinction.

dal4018 wrote:Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

Which ones don't mention it?
Last edited by Daisy on Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby tandfman » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:25 pm

dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.
tandfman
 
Posts: 15043
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:25 pm

Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:Obama said in his speech that we shouldn't be prisoners to the past we shouldn't forget it either someone once said"Those who forget the past are bound to repeat it" and "If you don't know your past you will not know your future"Both statements were made by MLK Jr.


Wrong again.

GEORGE SANTAYANA: "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Okay thank you pego
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:27 pm

tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.
Then what books should I be reading sir wrong is wrong no matter who initiated the crime.In general discussion when it comes to WWII Hitler's name is always mention first.
Last edited by dal4018 on Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby SQUACKEE » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:28 pm

tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.


I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12885
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Postby Daisy » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:31 pm

SQUACKEE wrote:I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.

It was interesting how Stalin thought he could rewrite history. Especially cutting people out of photo's when they fell out of favour. May be xcfan is reading Stalin's autobiography? I expect he paints himself as a good guy.

Image
Last edited by Daisy on Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:31 pm

SQUACKEE wrote:
tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.


I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.
Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:34 pm

Daisy wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.

It was interesting how Stalin thought he could rewrite history. Especially cutting people out of photo's when they fell out of favour. May be xcfan is reading Stalin's autobiography? I expect he paints himself as a good guy.
Trust me Squackee I'am not painting Stalin as a good guy anything but.He was a control freak as is the case with anyone in his position if he felt you were against him you were eliminated point blank as Daisy's aforementioned photos show.
Last edited by dal4018 on Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Daisy » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:36 pm

dal4018 wrote:Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.

Recall that Stalin was one of the allies. It's a complex story.
Image

dal4018 wrote:I'am not painting Stalin as a good guy anything but.

No one said you are. ????
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby SQUACKEE » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:39 pm

dal4018 wrote:[Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.


You said Stalin was not mentioned, maybe you didnt mean it literally?

dal4018-quote-Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12885
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:40 pm

Daisy wrote:
dal4018 wrote:Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.

Recall that Stalin was one of the allies. It's a complex story.
Image

dal4018 wrote:I'am not painting Stalin as a good guy anything but.

No one said you are. ????
Okay thanks and no one mentions the unclean closet of the man sitting to the left of FDR and the wrongs he did either and he too was one of the allies.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Pego » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:40 pm

dal4018 wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:
tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.


I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.
Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.


There is several reasons for this. Stalin's atrocities mostly took place before WWII. Stalin did not start the war, the Soviet Union was attacked by Hitler just as most of Europe was.
Pego
 
Posts: 10203
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:43 pm

SQUACKEE wrote:
dal4018 wrote:[Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.


You said Stalin was not mentioned, maybe you didnt mean it literally?

dal4018-quote-Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler
My apologies squackee I should have used the term general discussion.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby tandfman » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:43 pm

dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:
dal4018 wrote:Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.

Recall that Stalin was one of the allies. It's a complex story.
Image

dal4018 wrote:I'am not painting Stalin as a good guy anything but.

No one said you are. ????
Okay thanks and no one mentions the unclean closet of the man sitting to the left of FDR and the wrongs he did either and he too was one of the allies.

The man sitting to the left of FDR is Stalin, and lots of people have mentioned his unclean closet, even in this thread.
tandfman
 
Posts: 15043
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:45 pm

Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:
tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.


I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.
Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.


There is several reasons for this. Stalin's atrocities mostly took place before WWII. Stalin did not start the war, the Soviet Union was attacked by Hitler just as most of Europe was.
Okay granted why didn't someone bring these atrocities to the worlds attention???????
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Daisy » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:45 pm

dal4018 wrote:Okay thanks and no one mentions the unclean closet of the man sitting to the left of FDR and the wrongs he did either and he too was one of the allies.

Not true. It has been touched on before. Probably quite a few times.

tandfman wrote:The man sitting to the left of FDR is Stalin.

From the context i had assumed he meant to the left of the picture. i.e. Churchill.
Last edited by Daisy on Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:46 pm

tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Daisy wrote:
dal4018 wrote:Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.

Recall that Stalin was one of the allies. It's a complex story.
Image

dal4018 wrote:I'am not painting Stalin as a good guy anything but.

No one said you are. ????
Okay thanks and no one mentions the unclean closet of the man sitting to the left of FDR and the wrongs he did either and he too was one of the allies.

The man sitting to the left of FDR is Stalin, and lots of people have mentioned his unclean closet, even in this thread.
Okay I should have said his right.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby Pego » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:53 pm

dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:
tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.


I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.
Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.


There is several reasons for this. Stalin's atrocities mostly took place before WWII. Stalin did not start the war, the Soviet Union was attacked by Hitler just as most of Europe was.
Okay granted why didn't someone bring these atrocities to the worlds attention???????


It became a public knowledge after Stalin's death. Khrushchov was the one spilling the beans. Stalin died in 1953, the revelation came about a year or two later. Maybe late, but still quite some time ago.
Pego
 
Posts: 10203
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: beyond help

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:02 pm

Daisy wrote:
dal4018 wrote:Okay thanks and no one mentions the unclean closet of the man sitting to the left of FDR and the wrongs he did either and he too was one of the allies.

Not true. It has been touched on before. Probably quite a few times.

tandfman wrote:The man sitting to the left of FDR is Stalin.

From the context i had assumed he meant to the left of the picture. i.e. Churchill.
Yes Churchill is the one he's commited atrocities that the history books deny and paint him as the so-called good guy ask people of arab background about Churchill and they will paint a different picture of the man who made the victory sign famous.There's a dvd called www.whywefight.com it will show what Churchill was really like.
Last edited by dal4018 on Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:03 pm

Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:
tandfman wrote:
dal4018 wrote:
Pego wrote:Stalin never singled out a group of people based on their nationality, or religion. He eliminated those that were considered "class enemies". You'd better do some research before you start delivering sweeping opinions.
Yes but none the less he gave the authorization to murder innocent people and as stated before its not mentioned in the history books as is the case with Hitler.

You're reading the wrong history books.


I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.
Yes but as stated before in general discussion Hitler's name is always brought up first when the subject of WWII is mentioned.


There is several reasons for this. Stalin's atrocities mostly took place before WWII. Stalin did not start the war, the Soviet Union was attacked by Hitler just as most of Europe was.
Okay granted why didn't someone bring these atrocities to the worlds attention???????


It became a public knowledge after Stalin's death. Khrushchov was the one spilling the beans. Stalin died in 1953, the revelation came about a year or two later. Maybe late, but still quite some time ago.
Okay thanks to you pego.
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby odelltrclan » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:46 pm

Daisy wrote:
odelltrclan wrote:Who better than to comment on a socialist than someone who was reared in that system?

Are you talking about yourself or the republicans?


Neither. Read the article that is now linked to my first post. It was written by a non US citizen who was raised in socialist Russia and is commenting about how it appears our country is headed for the disaster his country went through and is trying to recover from.

It is a sobering review for someone who has no US political ties.
odelltrclan
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:30 pm

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:58 pm

odelltrclan wrote:
Daisy wrote:
odelltrclan wrote:Who better than to comment on a socialist than someone who was reared in that system?

Are you talking about yourself or the republicans?


Neither. Read the article that is now linked to my first post. It was written by a non US citizen who was raised in socialist Russia and is commenting about how it appears our country is headed for the disaster his country went through and is trying to recover from.

It is a sobering review for someone who has no US political ties.
Odell if a certain ex President who uttered the words"Mr.Gorbachev tear down this wall" were alive and read your article he would be screaming his head off!!!!!! here's the speech in its entirety http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWcUPBeWQEU
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Postby dal4018 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:10 pm

Daisy wrote:
SQUACKEE wrote:I must say my History books DID mention this guy name Stalin..quite a lot in fact, maybe it was a really expensive history book.

It was interesting how Stalin thought he could rewrite history. Especially cutting people out of photo's when they fell out of favour. May be xcfan is reading Stalin's autobiography? I expect he paints himself as a good guy.

Image
Squackee the men in the photos with Stalin who were they?
dal4018
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am

Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests