Tuariki wrote:Your unfortunate preachings behind the cloak of anonymity have all the hallmarks of those upright pillars of society and religious scions from the 1980s such as Jimmy Swaggart, Jim and Tammy Bakker. And those of the past 2 years such as Vaughn Reeves, Stephen Green, Albert Odulele, Allan Cundick, David Yonggi Cho, Jason Russell, Kong Hee, and Jack Schaap.
Those who preach loudest often tend to be the worst offenders. Remember, it takes 2 to tango. How much more fun it would be to have the names published of those who handed over $600.
One thing you are right about though - "its her life, let decide her destination".
Let me be clear Tuariki, because you are the one preaching here, not me. Those who like to condemn others for holding a certain morality that others are not ashamed to admit they don't hold often fail to see their own intolerance exhibited in their rantings. I have not denounced SFH or her actions, nor have I denounced anyone who supports what she chooses to do. I simple agreed that personally, I share the views of Marlow on the matter. It is hard to see how people cannot grasp that. How is that preaching, especially what you have done in this discussion in the reverse?
The discussions of you coming here on your wife's earnings were meant in jest. Perhaps you failed to see the humor. I mean do we really expect a wife of your's at her age to command such money?
So your so open about your views on this, and seemingly aghast at how others might feel differently, openly criticizing their mere mention of reflection on these events, let me ask you this question? You don't really have to answer it, but maybe ponder it.
How would you feel about introducing your daughters or grand daughters to this profession you seem to feel has no negative connotations? Would you recommend a career of such as this to them right along with many others they have to choose from? If not, why not?