Tuariki wrote:Why should 26 read the book when it is clear from his postings he already knows the answers?
OK, I do not usually let this stuff bother me, but you can cease and desist now -- why do you think they call it micro-dosing
Do you think that they take the performance-optimizing amount? And, if not, then why not if the testing in cycling is the same as the non-existent testing in boxing? Somehow, a mechanism where you can get some decent performance enhancing by being careful and keeping your dosage down is not exactly the same as a regime of no testing, period. If you think that they are identical, which is the position that you are arguing for in slamming my comment, then please let us all know exactly how they can get the same doping effects as if they were completely unconstrained in their doping regime. I have never heard anyone credibly claim that is true, but you apparently do.