A place for the discussion of all things not closely related to the sport and its competitive side. (Locked down several times a year during the major championships)
jazzcyclist wrote:Oregon has struggled . . . when teams have plenty of time to get ready for their tempo.
True dat. But as good as LaMichael was for the Ducks last year, DeAnthony (I see a trend here!) is a magnitude more dangerous now. There may be teams that will break the tempo, but no one will shut down their O. Outscore them . . . maybe.
jazzcyclist wrote:Boise State was decimated by the NFL, including seven defensive starters, a first-round running back and the winningest quarterback in the history of college football who will be playing on Sundays this year.
jazzcyclist wrote:Boise State was decimated by the NFL, including seven defensive starters, a first-round running back and the winningest quarterback in the history of college football who will be playing on Sundays this year.
Okay. Let me be more precise in my language wisenheimer. Boise State was decimated by the NFL, including seven defensive starters, a first-round running back and the winningest quarterback in the history of college football who will be on NFL regular season rosters drawing full NFL salaries.
And keep in mind that Moore wasn't even one of the Broncos that was drafted in April.
The way I read your original post, "playing on Sundays" refers solely to Kellen Moore. This statement piqued my interest, because the only thing I remembered about the professional phase of his career is that he was not drafted. A little research revealed that he signed a free-agent contract with the Lions, but is third-string behind the award-winning, but injury-prone, Matthew Stafford, and an experienced backup, Shaun Hill. So, as I wrote, I doubt that Moore will get to play this year.
3 new coaches this year in the South (UCLA, Arizona, Arizona State) and all with nice wins today. Arizona clobbers Oklahoma State and UCLA beats Nebraska. Arizona State has solved their disciplinary problems and drastic underachieving under Erickson and appear to have an offensive juggernaut so far. Oregon State knocks off Wisconsin.
Not for the Wisconsin fans. Badgers offense looks positively dreadful. It will be a mediocre season at best .
Yes, as odel says, the Pac 12 looks pretty good so far, with the Ducks leading the way. But sadly for Pego, the Big Ten really looks pretty dismal this season. Wisconsin wasn't so hot against a pretty ordinary OSU.
Marlow wrote:Just finished watching yesterday's wrap-up. Teams that are scary good: Okla St
Or not. Sorry, lonewolf. Arizona dropped 59 on them yesterday!
Shades of the 60s. I was embarassed just sitting here in lonely misery listening to the slaughter. Gotta think they were not that great a week ago and hope they are not as pathetic as last night. Local scribes are rationalizing the non-existent OSU defense could be attributed to the medical caused absence of the Defensive Coordinator but.....
odelltrclan wrote:Glad to see the Pac 12 getting some nice wins.
3 new coaches this year in the South (UCLA, Arizona, Arizona State) and all with nice wins today. Arizona clobbers Oklahoma State and UCLA beats Nebraska. Arizona State has solved their disciplinary problems and drastic underachieving under Erickson and appear to have an offensive juggernaut so far. Oregon State knocks off Wisconsin.
Yeah, huge day for the Pac. And those teams that got the big wins (Oregon State, Arizona, UCLA, Arizona State) are basically #4-7 in the Pac, with USC, Oregon, and (maybe) Stanford being #1-3.
Conor Dary wrote:By the way, what is with Auburn? They really suck. I guess Newton is that good.
Losing offensive coordinator Gus Malzahn at the end of last season is a big part of the problem. Florida suffered from the same malady under Urban Meyer. For example, many would argue that the Gators still haven't recovered from the loss of offensive coordinator Dan Mullen. (Coincidentally, Mullen's Mississippi State just bullied the Tigers.)
The Big Ten has been rather mediocre this year, with Penn State leading the fall, but with Wisconsin, Michigan State, Nebraska (but at leas they got beat by an apparently improving team), Michigan hammered by Alabama, etc, and even Ohio State having difficulty with Cal at home.
Well, lonewolf, Pego and I can enjoy Marlow's joy even if he cannot post about it right now (Jazz did it for him).
Did ya ever notice, results of football games are not always accurately predictable? I did not have personal emotional involvement in the USC-Stanford game but I was kinda empathically pulling for the Cardinal on Marlow's behalf. BTW, what is a Stanford Cardinal? Ya got St Louis and Louisville Cardinals, ya got Catholic Cardinals, ya got cardinal numbers .. ya got cardinal points of compass..ya got cardinal virtues.. ya even got a kinda dark red color..??
Cal's Brendan Bigelow (who? they say he was a very good HS sprinter) at one point yesterday had 3 carries for about 150y, including TD runs of 81 and 59y.
I'm thinking they probably haven't used the guy enough!
Down by seven with a few minutes to go, and you score a touchdown; do you kick the extra point or do you go for the two-point conversion to decide the game right then and there? It depends:
When it's a high-scoring game, your offense is playing great, your defense isn't; by all means, go for it.
When it's a low-scoring game, your offense is really bad, your defense has given up zero points all day; no, don't go for it, give your defense the opportunity to win the game.
Guess the BYU coach disagrees with me on that, as shown by his play-calling when BYU played Boise State yesterday.
j-a-m wrote:Guess the BYU coach disagrees with me on that, as shown by his play-calling when BYU played Boise State yesterday.
With 8:03 remaining, BYU backup quarterback Taysom Hill engineered an 11-play, 95 yard drive capped by his four-yard touchdown run. But BYU coach Bronco Mendenhall gambled, electing to go for a 2-point conversion to try to secure the Cougars' first-ever victory over Boise State. Hill dropped back to pass, was immediately flushed out of the pocket and his on-the-run throw was deflected by linebacker J.C. Percy and fell incomplete into the end zone. "I wanted to win," Mendenhall said. "We had momentum for the first time in the game, moving the ball offensively. We wanted to capitalize on it. I'd do it again."
"I wanted to win," Mendenhall said. "We had momentum for the first time in the game, moving the ball offensively. We wanted to capitalize on it. I'd do it again."
That coaching decision was a slap in the face of his defensive players after they did such an outstanding job in that game.
"I wanted to win," Mendenhall said. "We had momentum for the first time in the game, moving the ball offensively. We wanted to capitalize on it. I'd do it again."
That coaching decision was a slap in the face of his defensive players after they did such an outstanding job in that game.
??!! What would it have been to the offense who had just driven the field, if they hadn't gone for it? Strike while the iron is hot. Leaving it to overtime brings in all sorts of other variables, that might have had nothing to do with how well the D is playing.
The experts (sic) have been praising the Cardinal O-line, the great smash-mouth running game, the great D-line/linebackers, the improved D-backs, and the 'competence' of Nunes. I saw glimpses of it against SC, not much last night . . .
lonewolf wrote:Suck it up, Nick. You are Number 1.. how much fairer could it be?
Zackly! How on earth is the no-huddle, up-tempo offense NOT fair? Nick, if you think it gives an unfair advantage, then you are welcome to employ it! The 'safety issue' is a complete red herring!