LHC


A place for the discussion of all things not closely related to the sport and its competitive side. (as always, locked for the duration of major international championship)

Re: LHC

Postby 26mi235 » Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:48 pm

Lots of comments on leaving out the mainly American team of Gerald Guralnik, Tom Kibble and Carl Hagen. Some Euro-centric bias has been asserted by some. Of course, the limit of three means only one of these could be selected.

Others thought the (6000?) experimenters should be recognized, but there were two teams and even taking the (rotating!) leaders would lead to four.

Finally, Anderson (who helped kill the Superconducting Super Collider in Texas in 1993) also developed key elements [coming from superconductivity]. However, he already has his own Nobel for superconductivity...
26mi235
 
Posts: 16320
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: LHC

Postby JRM » Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:15 am

26mi235 wrote:Lots of comments on leaving out the mainly American team of Gerald Guralnik, Tom Kibble and Carl Hagen. Some Euro-centric bias has been asserted by some. Of course, the limit of three means only one of these could be selected.


Ernst Stuckelberg is probably one of the earliest people to have worked on the idea of gauge symmetry breaking and mass generation (from 1938). Although one could argue that this isn't really the Higgs mechanism, because it is applied to the wrong type of particle.

Others thought the (6000?) experimenters should be recognized, but there were two teams and even taking the (rotating!) leaders would lead to four.


That would have been interesting, since the current director of the CMS experiment is a colleague of mine. I've never known a Nobel Laureate personally! For a bunch of reasons, though, this path would have been quite complicated and unwieldy for the award.

Finally, Anderson (who helped kill the Superconducting Super Collider in Texas in 1993) also developed key elements [coming from superconductivity]. However, he already has his own Nobel for superconductivity...


Anderson's case is a strange one. He published a paper on it in 1963, one year before Englert and Brout's paper (which itself preceded Higg's paper by a few months). Since Anderson and E&B both worked in condensed matter physics (superconductivity) and knew each other, it was a mystery why E&B's paper didn't even mention Anderson's.
JRM
 
Posts: 2625
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Re: LHC

Postby mcgato » Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:23 pm

mcgato wrote:My recent alumni magazine had an article on one of the spokesmen for the Higgs boson project, who got his PhD from U of Chicago, where I got my undergrad degree. It turns out my one year stint as a physics lab tech was spent helping out on his project that would make up his PhD. I haven't been following the Higgs boson project too closely though.
CNN has an article on Joe Incandela, who I was referring to here. I will thusly post a link.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/14/tech/inno ... ?hpt=hp_c3
mcgato
 
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Hoboken

Re: LHC

Postby El Toro » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:36 am

Spotted on the interwebs...

So, a Higgs boson walks into a Catholic church and the priest says, "get out, we don't want your type here!"

The Higgs boson replies, "But without me, how can you have Mass?"
El Toro
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: LHC

Postby bambam » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:29 am

El Toro wrote:Spotted on the interwebs...

So, a Higgs boson walks into a Catholic church and the priest says, "get out, we don't want your type here!"

The Higgs boson replies, "But without me, how can you have Mass?"


I love that!
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: LHC

Postby gh » Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:29 am

Almost as funny as when I posted it on the first page of this thread in July of 2012 :mrgreen:
gh
 
Posts: 46322
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: LHC

Postby 26mi235 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:34 am

Survey of Exotic Decays of the Higgs -- that is, ones that might be not under the Standard Model.

http://profmattstrassler.com/2013/12/19 ... s-is-done/

..this is a paper that examines a wide class of possible decays that our newly found Higgs particle might exhibit, but that would not occur if the Standard Model of particle physics (the equations we use to describe the known elementary particles and forces plus the simplest possible type of Higgs particle) were all there was to see at the Large Hadron Collider [LHC], the giant proton-proton collider outside of Geneva, Switzerland.


[Non-experts; sorry, but this paper was written for experts, and probably has a minimum of two words of jargon per sentence. I promise you a summary soon.]
26mi235
 
Posts: 16320
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: LHC

Postby Marlow » Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:37 am

Y'know, I was just telling my Quantum Mechanist friend the other day, "The "three forces" can be described as a combination of three Unitary Gauge Groups usually denoted as SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1). SU(3) describes strong interactions with (32-1) = 8 associated massless gauge fields (Gluons) U(1) alone describes electromagnetic interactions with its single massless gauge boson (photon) SU(2) alone does NOT describe weak interactions instead, the mixing of SU(2)xU(1) is necessary to describe electroweak interactions the massless gauge bosons of weak interactions acquire mass by their interaction with a scalar field (the Higgs Field) resulting in a single massless gauge boson (photon as above) 3 (non-zero mass) intermediate vector bosons (W+, W- & Z0) Hence the current model of the mediators of electroweak interactions."
He agreed.
Marlow
 
Posts: 21084
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: LHC

Postby lonewolf » Fri Dec 20, 2013 10:34 am

Thanks for clearing that up. :?
lonewolf
 
Posts: 8814
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Indian Territory

Re: LHC

Postby El Toro » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:28 pm

gh wrote:Almost as funny as when I posted it on the first page of this thread in July of 2012 :mrgreen:

The embarrassing thing is that I actually checked first! :oops:
El Toro
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: LHC

Postby gh » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:04 am

and now, starring in its own movie, the Higgs Boson!

(nominated for best assistant actor, CERN)

http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/P ... 314481.php
gh
 
Posts: 46322
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: LHC

Postby Marlow » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:46 am

Here's my "this-gives-me-a-headache' question:

Howe can it be possible that the Big Bang created space-time (i.e., there was no time before the BB because there was no space-time) when, in order for the BB to even occur, it needed to exist in space-time (i.e., only nothing can exist in nothing, and the BB was 'something')?
Alternately, how could the the BB have created space-time AND matter/energy simultaneously without a 'cause'? Or . . oh dear . . . will the Unified Field Theory discover that space-time AND matter/energy are one and the same??!!
I need to lie down.
Marlow
 
Posts: 21084
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: LHC

Postby 26mi235 » Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:33 am

Beginning, Inflation, Big Bang. Go read the pieces by Strassler I gave at the beginning of the thread.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16320
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: LHC

Postby Marlow » Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:40 am

26mi235 wrote:Beginning, Inflation, Big Bang. Go read the pieces by Strassler I gave at the beginning of the thread.

Give me a 2-sentence recap. Somebody famous once said that if you can't explain something in 2 sentences, you don't really understand it yourself. :twisted:
Marlow
 
Posts: 21084
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: LHC

Postby 26mi235 » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:31 pm

Marlow wrote:
26mi235 wrote:Beginning, Inflation, Big Bang. Go read the pieces by Strassler I gave at the beginning of the thread.

Give me a 2-sentence recap. Somebody famous once said that if you can't explain something in 2 sentences, you don't really understand it yourself. :twisted:


Feynman's famously said, in reply to a similar question, if he could do that it would not be worth a Nobel Prize. The comment is relevant here.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16320
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: LHC

Postby Marlow » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:23 pm

26mi235 wrote: if he could do that it would not be worth a Nobel Prize. The comment is relevant here.

There's no Nobel on the line here . . .
Here's my summary of a Nobel Laureate's best book:
Some kids get stranded on an island without adults and degenerate into raw ids; the fat one gets it, and the good one is saved deus ex machina.
Marlow
 
Posts: 21084
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: LHC

Postby lonewolf » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:26 pm

I an not concerned that I do not understand all this space/time/BB stuff when I do not even understand all the permutations of the offside rule. :?
lonewolf
 
Posts: 8814
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Indian Territory

Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests