A place for the discussion of all things not closely related to the sport and its competitive side. (Locked down several times a year during the major championships)
There is a metric space that was invented by Hilbert and it is called a Hilbert Space. The undergrad math center at U of Oregon has a picture of Hilbert on the wall and is called Hilbert Space.
jules wrote:There is a metric space that was invented by Hilbert and it is called a Hilbert Space. The undergrad math center at U of Oregon has a picture of Hilbert on the wall and is called Hilbert Space.
The Bible, Warren Wiersbe's The Bible Exposition Commentary, and Moody Classic's The Apostolic Fathers. Getting ready to read Lutzer's One Minute After You Die.
I just finished the last Harry Potter book. 2 years ago I heard some teens talking about it on Bart. I harbored a misconception for 2 years.
Now I am reading Gabriela, Clove and Cinnamon by Jorge Amado.
I only decided Harry Potter might be worth reading after sharing a Lufthansa flight to Frankfurt a few years ago and the guy next to me was a 40-something computer nerd and he was reading it in the German version, so I decided it muust have some redeeming value.
Most certainly did. Have read them all twice now except the last, which I'll do before the movie comes out. (make that movies, plural; last book is going to be made into a pair of flicks, apparently)
Last I read was "The Secret Speech" by Tom Rob Smith. It is a follow on to his first novel "Child 44". The protagonist is a MVD (then KGB) officer who got involved in solving murders (in the workers paradise, can't happen). Smith is a Brit, the books are pretty good. My next will be Joseph Kanon's new one, "Stardust". It takes place in Hollywood in the late 40s, early 50s during the the HUAC witch hunts. His 1st two were his strongest, IMO, Los Alamos & The Good German. The Prodigal Spy was okay, Alibi weak. Last chance Joe.
Oh, just remembered, one of Mary's tutees loaned her the new Dan Brown opus, "The Lost Symbol". I will probably read it, but I know how it will play out. The least likely suspect will turn out to be Dr Evil.
26mi235 wrote:A Distant Mirror, Tuchman (history of the 14th century)
Men of Mathematics, E>T>Bell
Einstein: his life and universe - by Walter Isaacson [just beginning]
Alpha Girls, Dan Kindlon [just beginning]
If you like Bell's book, here are some suggestions. 2 bios of Paul Erdos : My Brain is Open by Bruce Schechter and The Man Who Loved Only Numbers by Paul Hoffman.
Hilbert by Constance Reid. She has written other math bios but I think this one is the best.
Yes, the Hoffman book on Erdos is a fine read. Erdos, was quite a character. His letters usually started with no greeting, just 'Let f(x) be a function...'
Also if you liked Hilbert, her companion piece Courant is a good read.
I have (and read) the Erdos book by Hoffman -- while we are on that topic, I think my number is 3, but it might be 4; I will have to talk with my wife, whose number is one better. [A friend/colleague's husband did the first 'real' proof (one that could be really verified) of the four color problem - he needed it as lemma for another result and did not trust the overly-long computer proof.]
The pun by gh was very good; maybe I will search out that Hilbert book.
gh wrote:I only decided Harry Potter might be worth reading after sharing a Lufthansa flight to Frankfurt a few years ago and the guy next to me was a 40-something computer nerd and he was reading it in the German version, so I decided it muust have some redeeming value.
Most certainly did. Have read them all twice now except the last, which I'll do before the movie comes out. (make that movies, plural; last book is going to be made into a pair of flicks, apparently)
I only read the Harry Potter books because of GH. Before talking to him I thought they were kids' books.
26mi235 wrote:A friend/colleague's husband did the first 'real' proof (one that could be really verified) of the four color problem - he needed it as lemma for another result and did not trust the overly-long computer proof.
Good data, 26mi235. I was not aware that the four-color theorem had been proved in the "old way" rather than the poorly considered computer proof. Good to know.
26mi235 wrote:A friend/colleague's husband did the first 'real' proof (one that could be really verified) of the four color problem - he needed it as lemma for another result and did not trust the overly-long computer proof.
Good data, 26mi235. I was not aware that the four-color theorem had been proved in the "old way" rather than the poorly considered computer proof. Good to know.
I wasn't aware of that either. So that is 2 things I have learned on this thread. The other being that gh knows what a Hilbert Space is.
When I see DK, I think of Democratic Kampuchea, better known to most people as the Khmer Rouge... as well as the best band in history, the Dead Kennedys.
And to get back on topic, I'm reading The Subterraneans by JK.
OK, I just finished a stunning little tome. Let's see if anybody can figure out what it's about, since it contained about a word-per-page that I was unfamiliar with. Fortunately, most made sense in context.
gh wrote:OK, I just finished a stunning little tome. Let's see if anybody can figure out what it's about, since it contained about a word-per-page that I was unfamiliar with. Fortunately, most made sense in context.
gh wrote:OK, I just finished a stunning little tome. Let's see if anybody can figure out what it's about, since it contained about a word-per-page that I was unfamiliar with. Fortunately, most made sense in context.
For light reading, a few months ago I discovered the novels by John Sandford, centered around Twin Cities cop Lucas Davenport, who tracks down BAD, repeat BAD guys. Good stuff.
For knowledge reading, it is a constant array of non fiction history narratives. Too many to list here.
I gave Sandford props near the end of page 2, after rereading the whole set during my 2 trips to Beijing (and the OT). You wouldn't want that guy on your tail!
gh wrote:OK, I just finished a stunning little tome. Let's see if anybody can figure out what it's about, since it contained about a word-per-page that I was unfamiliar with. Fortunately, most made sense in context.
(extra points for being able to define all the words)
(all without looking of course!)
I went 0 for 8. I am trying to read a 940 page doorstop Theodore Roosevelt biography ,"Wilderness Warrior", focused on his lifelong interest in stuff like that. I am almost duty bound to read it and report back to my only Republican daughter who gave it to me, unaware that, rather than being politically historical, it is largely dedicated to meticulousy enumerating every bird and animal he collected and stuffed and how he arranged them on the shelf from age eight on. (Ok, slight exaggeration but not much)
Last edited by lonewolf on Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
