Antonio Pettigrew latest victim in doping hunt


This Forum was created to divert traffic from Current Events at the height of the BALCO scandal. It comes and goes as "needed"; it's back to being locked.

Postby tandfman » Thu May 22, 2008 11:11 am

tandfman
 
Posts: 15043
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Postby bad hammy » Thu May 22, 2008 11:17 am

tandfman wrote:Pettigrew has now admitted doping.

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/ ... tigrew.php

Sounds like they were pretty effective:
Once he began taking the banned substances, Pettigrew said he was able to run 400 meters in under 43 seconds for the first time.
bad hammy
 
Posts: 10881
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Kevin Richardson » Thu May 22, 2008 1:34 pm

Flumpy wrote:
Kevin Richardson wrote:Not to sound like I am waving the flag here, but let us keep in mind that most of the latest revelations stem from investigations into American athletes, only. The Mitchell Report could not care any less about foreign athletes. So, before we start casting stones at the American system, let us reflect on the fact that it is an American system which is bringing most of this to the fore. That neither vindicates nor indicts athletes from other nations. It just is what it is.


Which is only the case because the American system have been so lax over so many years. They have a lot of catchung up to do. It's obvious the authorities knew about this for years but did nothing about it.

You can't now make out that the US deserves credit for cleaning up it's own mess. Too little too late in my opinion.


Not sure how it is so obvious that they knew anything at all. Suspicions are like armpits, in that most people have them, and they often smell bad.

So, would you recommend that the US do nothing at all? :? When sufficient information arose, and was ferreted out diligently by a few individuals, the system did what it was supposed to do. Sorry we did not get around to it before now, but you know how it is.............there really are a few things that rise to greater levels of importance for the US Senate. As for the USTAF/USOC lot? Can't say what they were busy with, but since we provide them so little in the way of funding, we are just pleased with anything we get from them. :wink:

Bottom line...........The yanks are doing the best they can with what they know to root out drug cheats. We are goring our own bulls, as we are taking down some of our most popular athletes in the sport. If that is not enough for some critics, well..........sorry!

Cheers
Kevin Richardson
 
Posts: 901
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, Alabama

Postby AthleticsInBritain » Thu May 22, 2008 3:06 pm

I don't think anyone from any one country has any moral right to the moral high ground.

I'm not going to tell anyone their own business. But there's always been an impression over here of great leniency and looking the other way in the States. Of course, nobody really bothered about it anywhere until the Ben Johnson scandal. Even over here people joke about US colleges asking sports people if they're on steroids or not, and if not, making sure they are.

Mind you, I'm sure that the proportion of US PED users is no different to the rest of the world, although being a more moneyed country, you have more ability to finance purchase of said PEDs. A country with a larger population would be bound to have larger numbers involved.

The introduction of USADA seems to have made a positive difference over there, which is fantastic. I make no comment about USATF/USOC.

Still, someone must have known something if doping on this scale is going on - and this IS only one supply chain. It's the thought of people in charge who know who is doing what, while spouting anti-PED rhetoric and welcoming them to their meetings and celebrating their medals that makes me sick.
AthleticsInBritain
 
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:01 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby bambam » Thu May 22, 2008 4:17 pm

Here is the list of positive doping "irregularities" found at the Olympic Games since 1968 (all sports). USA is up there pretty high. Please note that GDR = 0.

RUS 14
AUT 11
USA 9
BUL 8
HUN 7
GRE 5
BLR 4
CAN 4
ESP 4
GER 4
LTU 4
SWE 4
MGL 3
POL 3
GBR 2
IND 2
IRL 2
JPN 2
PUR 2
ROU 2
TCH 2
AFG 1
ALG 1
ARM 1
AUS 1
CHN 1
COL 1
CRO 1
CUB 1
ETH 1
EUN 1
FIN 1
FRA 1
FRG 1
IRI 1
ISL 1
ITA 1
KEN 1
LAT 1
LIB 1
MAR 1
MDA 1
MON 1
MYA 1
NED 1
NOR 1
TUR 1
UKR 1
URS 1
UZB 1
bambam
 
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Durham, NC

Postby Jaack » Fri May 23, 2008 2:55 am

He was always a key player in the relays, accordingly I can see United states being DQ'd in.....oh, 97 world, 99 worlds, 2000 Olympics AND 2001 Worlds! :shock: :shock:

Which means Britian are 97 world champions, Poland are 1999 champions, Nigeria are the Olympic champions and the Bahamas win the 2001 world championships!
Jaack
 
Posts: 1846
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:44 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Postby peach » Fri May 23, 2008 3:47 am

bambam wrote:Here is the list of positive doping "irregularities" found at the Olympic Games since 1968 (all sports). USA is up there pretty high. Please note that GDR = 0.


Yes, but that means nothing- the GDR used to test all their athletes before they left East Germany and if any of them failed tests, they would be mysteriously "injured" and not go to the games...
peach
 
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:10 am

Postby kamikaze7 » Fri May 23, 2008 4:31 am

The 1993 team should lose its medals too even though Pettigrew did not run in the finals. Thye sport needs harsher penalties. :evil:

And I hope Pettigrew will get a lifetime ban including his job at UNC. Having a coach who is a cheat cant possibly be good for UNC anyway.
kamikaze7
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:05 pm

Postby peach » Fri May 23, 2008 5:45 am

Depends how far the evidence goes back...

Of course, once you cheat, I think you should forfeit everything you've ever won before but as the rules stand, there isn't anything to say that he was doping then.

I mean, it is my own personal belief that there is no way in hell that Marion Jones wasn't swallowing pills left right and centre from 1997 onwards when she returned from nowhere in a blaze of glory, but the evidence only goes back to 2000 and so she gets to keep everything prior to then...

Just a rather silly flaw in a rather silly system...
peach
 
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:10 am

Postby EPelle » Fri May 23, 2008 6:45 am

kamikaze7 wrote:The 1993 team should lose its medals too even though Pettigrew did not run in the finals. Thye sport needs harsher penalties. :evil:

And I hope Pettigrew will get a lifetime ban including his job at UNC. Having a coach who is a cheat cant possibly be good for UNC anyway.

Eight-year statute of limitations rule comes into effect here, though I agree with Peach:s sentiment above.
EPelle
 
Posts: 21442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby dcunited » Fri May 23, 2008 6:35 pm

Well as jaded as I've been lately, can't say it's any less disheartening to see heart and soul torn out of the sport knowing full well it deserved better. I rue the contracts and cash that changed the game even though some athletes who competed clean got something out of it. Somehow it's always seemed to me T&F suffers more than other sports by presence of PEDs. My coach knew what he was doing by sticking with smaller colleges. Even though world has changed so much it seems, I can still feel for athletes shut out of contention by the cheating way of life that took hold of sport.
dcunited
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: east coast

Postby catson52 » Fri May 23, 2008 6:51 pm

dcunited wrote:Well as jaded as I've been lately, can't say it's any less disheartening to see heart and soul torn out of the sport knowing full well it deserved better. I rue the contracts and cash that changed the game even though some athletes who competed clean got something out of it. Somehow it's always seemed to me T&F suffers more than other sports by presence of PEDs. My coach knew what he was doing by sticking with smaller colleges. Even though world has changed so much it seems, I can still feel for athletes shut out of contention by the cheating way of life that took hold of sport.


We have all had our suspicions for many (30+) years. As the headlines at T&FN site show, things are getting unravelled. Or to put it less politely, the shit has hit the fan. And the "stains" will be spread far and wide, both in this country and elsewhere. I went from being a rabid fan (knowing top 20+ at almost any time in all standard events in the precomputer era), to a somewhat disinterested fan. More for self protection than anything else, for no one likes a one time hero being exposed for a "fraud".
catson52
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:22 am

Postby dcunited » Sat May 24, 2008 4:48 am

Yeah man.
dcunited
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: east coast

Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest