Tatyana Lysenko tests positive!


This Forum was created to divert traffic from Current Events at the height of the BALCO scandal. It comes and goes as "needed"; it's back to being locked.

Tatyana Lysenko tests positive!

Postby Powell » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:24 am

According to the ITAR-TASS press agency, Tatyana Lysenko's A sample tested positive after a test carried out by WADA on 9 May. The B sample results are not available yet.

The substance she allegedly tested positive for is an estrogen inhibitor.

Source (in Polish): http://sport.onet.pl/74450,1248733,1575 ... omosc.html
Powell
 
Posts: 9065
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Vanuatu

Postby EPelle » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:29 am

Go ahead, gh, snub the board. This sh_t won:t go away any time soon.
EPelle
 
Posts: 21442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Tatyana Lysenko tests positive!

Postby Mats Nilsson » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:30 am

...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Last edited by Mats Nilsson on Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mats Nilsson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:20 am

Postby Jon » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:34 am

Jon
 
Posts: 9231
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Powell » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:37 am

Now, who will be the first to say they knew it all along?
Powell
 
Posts: 9065
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Vanuatu

Postby Jon » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:41 am

That report says Yekaterina Koroshikh also tested positive.
Jon
 
Posts: 9231
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby EPelle » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:41 am

Why would anyone? She:s been consistent and hasn:t caused any alarm bells to ring. This is likely to have been the source of previous discussion Bruce had mentioned asking why something not on WADA list would be considered a positive.
EPelle
 
Posts: 21442
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Mats Nilsson » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:42 am

...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Last edited by Mats Nilsson on Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Mats Nilsson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:20 am

Postby Jon » Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:43 am

Powell wrote:Now, who will be the first to say they knew it all along?
Methinks Aubergine might have known something:
http://mb.trackandfieldnews.com/discuss ... ht=#301202
Jon
 
Posts: 9231
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby Flumpy » Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:06 am

I will be the first to admit this one wasn't 'obvious' to me at all.

Go Yipsi!!!

(Or preferably Olga but I think that might be wishful thinking).
Flumpy
 
Posts: 3900
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby nevetsllim » Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:08 am

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! :cry: :cry: :cry:

Lysenko was one of my favourite athletes :cry:
nevetsllim
 
Posts: 6261
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:54 am

Postby Justin Clouder » Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:26 am

Cover star of Athletics 2007! Marvelous!

Justin
Justin Clouder
 
Posts: 1200
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:14 am
Location: London, UK

Postby Flumpy » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Jon wrote:
Powell wrote:Now, who will be the first to say they knew it all along?
Methinks Aubergine might have known something:
http://mb.trackandfieldnews.com/discuss ... ht=#301202


Is Aubergine someone in the know???
Flumpy
 
Posts: 3900
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby mojo » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:07 pm

Could someone please tell me what an estrogen inhibitor is? :?:

And how can she banned for something not on the banned list?
Last edited by mojo on Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mojo
 
Posts: 5519
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: at the finish line freezing my butt off

Postby TheMole » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:08 pm

Last edited by TheMole on Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TheMole
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Rimini, Italy

Postby mojo » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:12 pm

Thanks for the link to that thread.

I still don't get it but I am sure I will eventually. :?
mojo
 
Posts: 5519
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: at the finish line freezing my butt off

Postby Kurt Francis » Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:24 pm

More important than her testing positive...or supposedly so...is the fact that such a result was LEAKED before the B sample results came thru. Its time to start SUING those responsible for leaking such information. Or better yet, just take the leakers out behind the barn and shoot them. I'm only saying that in half-jest...that's how serious I think such leaks are.

Kurt
Kurt Francis
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby eldrick » Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:51 pm

mojo wrote:Could someone please tell me what an estrogen inhibitor is? :?:

And how can she banned for something not on the banned list?


it's a pretty bullshit way to dope:

it comes effectively under s4 of wada doping list with likely some anastrazole derivative

this kinda rubbish probably puts a few cms on your distance ( you are looking for miniscule improvements with "blockers" ), but nowhere near how quicker she ran
eldrick
 
Posts: 14147
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: 19th hole st andrews

Postby deca-pat » Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:41 pm

eldrick wrote: this kinda rubbish probably puts a few cms on your distance ( you are looking for miniscule improvements with "blockers" ), but nowhere near how quicker she ran


you might be surprised! it also could be used with something else and thats what showed up. I'm as disappointed as the next guy but some things are not really surprising anymore. :|
deca-pat
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest