IAAF Says Young Needs To Return Gold Medal


This Forum was created to divert traffic from Current Events at the height of the BALCO scandal. It comes and goes as "needed"; it's back to being locked.

IAAF Says Young Needs To Return Gold Medal

Postby gh » Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:48 am

gh
 
Posts: 46290
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Postby MJR » Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:08 am

i think he has been quoted as saying something like they can pry it from his cold, dead hands....
MJR
 
Posts: 1812
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: on walkabout....

IOC Announcement

Postby ZZrunZZ » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:13 am

IOC Executive Board closes Jerome Young case

27 October 2005
The IOC Executive Board this morning put a close to the Jerome Young case by taking the following decision:

- The athlete Mr Jerome Young (USA) is disqualified from the 4 x 400 men’s relay event of the Games of the XXVII Olympiad in Sydney.

- The United States Olympic Committee is ordered to return to the IOC the medal and diploma awarded to Mr Young for the 4 x 400 men’s relay event.

- The IAAF is requested to take the appropriate steps so that its records reflect the contents of this decision.

A long process

- September 2000: US team, consisting of Michael Johnson, Antonio Pettigrew, Angelo Taylor, Alvin Harrison, Calvin Harrison and Jerome Young, wins men’s 4 x 400m relay event at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. For reference, Jerome Young ran in the semi-final of the relay, but not in the final.

- September 2003: USOC confirmed that, on the basis of his own quotations reported in the Los Angeles Times, the identity of the so-called ”unnamed athlete” who had tested positive for a banned substance but was allowed to compete in track and field in Sydney, was indeed Jerome Young.

- February 2004: USATF recognised that Jerome Young was the athlete who tested positive for the steroid nandrolone in 1999 but had been cleared by a USATF panel to compete in Sydney. Consequently, the IAAF announced that it would launch a legal inquiry against USATF for having wrongly cleared Young. The IAAF also asked CAS to look into the matter.

- June 2004: CAS ruled in favour of the IAAF and confirmed that Young should have been ineligible to compete in Sydney.

- July 2004: the IAAF made a recommendation to the IOC that all members of the US relay team that won the Olympic gold in the 4 x 400m race be stripped of their medals. USOC and athletes Michael Johnson, Antonio Pettigrew, Angelo Taylor, Alvin Harrison and Calvin Harrison appealed the decision.

- July 2005: CAS upheld the appeal filed by USOC and the athletes against the decision of the IAAF to annul the results of the US men’s 4 x 400m relay team and stated that the results obtained by the athletes should stand. CAS further ruled that “it is the understanding of the Panel that only Jerome Young in the USA relay team should be stripped of his gold medal”.
ZZrunZZ
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Northeast

Postby 26mi235 » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:34 am

This phrase is interesting:

- June 2004: CAS ruled in favour of the IAAF and confirmed that Young should have been ineligible to compete in Sydney.

"should have been" is not "was". I presume that since the CAS upheld his DQ they thought he only should have been ineligible, but in fact WAS ineligible. There are some legal niceties involved there that I do not know enough about to ascertain if I think that the correct decision has been made.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16313
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: IOC Announcement

Postby paddyb » Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:29 am

ZZrunZZ wrote:IOC Executive Board closes Jerome Young case


- July 2004: the IAAF made a recommendation to the IOC that all members of the US relay team that won the Olympic gold in the 4 x 400m race be stripped of their medals. USOC and athletes Michael Johnson, Antonio Pettigrew, Angelo Taylor, Alvin Harrison and Calvin Harrison appealed the decision.

- July 2005: CAS upheld the appeal filed by USOC and the athletes against the decision of the IAAF to annul the results of the US men’s 4 x 400m relay team and stated that the results obtained by the athletes should stand. CAS further ruled that “it is the understanding of the Panel that only Jerome Young in the USA relay team should be stripped of his gold medal”.


Old thread reignited....

What happened with Alvin and Calvin's ban? Did they lose performances retrospectively. I know that US kept the 4x400m from Sydney because Young only ran in the semi - but it would seem that if the US 4x4 womens lose their medal b/c of Marion then the other MJ loses his?
paddyb
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Postby tandfman » Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:49 am

My recollection is that the Harrison case(s) had to do with things that happened well after the Sydney Olympics, so they'd have no effect at all on the Sydney medal situation.
tandfman
 
Posts: 15041
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest