by Guest » Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
>Owens set more world records in a single
>afternoon than Carl Lewis did in his whole
>career, excluding relays.
If you mean officially-recognized WRs, then you're right. The problem is that in 1936 there were more than twice as many running events as now, with imperial and metric distances.
At the 1935 Big 10 meet, Owens ran 9.4 to tie the 100y WR. He'd already done that many times, as had several other athletes. He set a WR in the 220y at 20.3 (and was credited with the 200m record at the same time). The IAAF did not distinguish between times on a straightaway and around a curve back then; Australia's James Carlton had run 20.5 around a turn, so Owen's mark was slightly inferior. Another record was the 220y hurdles -- run only in the USA, it's hard to call a mark in that event a "World Record". His best mark that day was definitely the LJ -- more on that later.
Lewis competed at a time that all sprint WRs were altitude-aided. Lewis set 3 officially-recognized WRs for the 100. When you include unofficial low-altitude WRs, he set 6 in the 100, one in the 200, and three in the LJ.
Owens' LJ mark stood for 25 years, while Lewis' three low-alt. marks stood for a total of 10. Owens improved on the previous WR by less than 2% while Lewis' three marks improved it by more than 2%. Finally, Lewis also set the indoor WR in the LJ -- and it still stands today.
As far as WRs go, I think Lewis has at least as much to point to as Owens. As far as other accomplishments go, it's not even close.