Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races


Forum devoted to track & field items of an historical nature.

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby kuha » Sat May 26, 2012 2:06 pm

Totally agree. I'd LOVE to see this, and have at least some small hope that it will surface sooner or later. I still believe that no one else--ever--could have consistently beaten the Ryun of 1967.
kuha
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Sat May 26, 2012 10:32 pm

looking at the old footage of ryan and seeing the splits, i'd say the guy was capable of a 345 mile.
given all the delux track, drafting and all time peak.

all time peak in perfect conditions = ppc

ovett however, i give only a second or two under his pr. i.e. ovett did race very optimally, did get in the even paced races, did draft on many occasion. all the waving down the stretch during the wr to me is just steve bullshitting. he's trying to make it seem like it was a walk in the park when in reality he was close to max.

el g: comes in at 341 mile and 324mid 1500. ppc

coe? though i pick him in championships i can't predict his best 1500 time ppc.
i think coe was capable of 140 low in the 800 which implies a possible 1500 which is off the charts.
before you jump all over this conjecture, consider (i think) coe was quoted to say the he though he could run 1:39...!

why coe never put the 1500 wr out of reach, is beyond me. a maybe not so wild guess is that dad optimized training for less than the mile distance i.e. 49-51 second pace not 55-56 second pace. this would leave coe at 1200m in a very fast race in a lot of pain and you can get him at this point if you are a super fit cram and coe's a little off peak.

looking at training logs it seems that the specialist el-g got it right for the mile and trained more in 52-56 second land.
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby Deerfoot » Sun May 27, 2012 4:27 pm

Looking at their careers it's impossible not to put Coe above Ovett, given his two Olympic gold medals. However, I do think that in ability over 1500m or a mile they were closely matched. Perhaps Coe had a slight edge, but no more than that. As I'vs said on this thread, if they'd had a series against each other I think the wins would have been pretty evenly distributed. As for competitors being more in awe of Coe than Ovett, Wessinghage(also in Pat Butcher's book) expresses similar sentiments about both runners in this regard, saying of Ovett after one performance: 'I sensed he was human after all. Now I know I was wrong.'. Walker says that 'He could have won anything' and then adds 'But so could Coe.' Coe was the greater, but I'm not sure he was the better, at any rate over 1500m.
As for Ryun I really can't say. I've read historical accounts and seen a few of his races on youtube, but they don't really give me the full flavour. I do find it hard to credit some of the more extravagent claims made on his behalf, such as 1:40 for 800m and 3:42 for the mile if he were running now.
Deerfoot
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:23 pm

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Mon May 28, 2012 12:44 pm

coe? though i pick him in championships i can't predict his best 1500 time ppc.
i think coe was capable of 140 low in the 800 which implies a possible 1500 which is off the charts.
before you jump all over this conjecture, consider (i think) coe was quoted to say the he though he could run 1:39...!

why coe never put the 1500 wr out of reach, .


Certainly at the end of the 81 season Coe was quoted as saying that he felt he could run 1:40 for 800, implying a sub 1:41.0. I think he could have done this in 81 had he had several cracks at it towards the end of the season. He said he would experiment with running the first 400 in 48-49 secs in the winter before a further assault in 82. Sadly he got injured was out for most of the summer and then got ill, which also wiped out the 83 season. Had he enjoyed the same build up as 81 in those 2 seasons I feel confident he would have gone sub 1:41.

He was also disappointed he hadn't put the 1500 & Mile records "out of reach" that season (81). This was largely due to diabolical pacing in his 3 attempts, especially the 1500 in Stockholm, where he solo ran 3:31 with a 52.4 first 400 thanks to Robinson's 51.5. Anyone who can then go on to front run through 800 in 1:49.1 & miss the WR by 0.6 was clearly capable of 3:28.0 - 3:28.5 that night, which would have put it out of reach for over a decade.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Mon May 28, 2012 12:46 pm

He talked about a future 3:44 mile in 81, but again the illnesses of 82/ 83 probably took away his best 2 seasons in terms of age. By the time he started the comeback I think he was just concerned with getting to LA. After the Games he tried in Zurich but was again hindered by Robinson's pacing, this time too slow. A very easy 3:32 resulted in further injury to his foot, & a premature end to his season for the 3rd year running (and the 5th time in previous 6 years!). After that he never really got back to record breaking form until a near miss (3:29.7) at the end of 86. He said then that running such a time at 30 convinced him he "should at some time (earlier in his career) have run much faster" .

As for Ryun I really can't say. I've read historical accounts and seen a few of his races on youtube, but they don't really give me the full flavour. I do find it hard to credit some of the more extravagent claims made on his behalf, such as 1:40 for 800m and 3:42 for the mile if he were running now.


You mean Ventolin aka Eldrick!?

The way he knocks seconds off Ryun's times for this and that is rather silly and doesn't help his case at all. I am sure he could have run significantly faster on synthetic, but nowhere near 1:40 or 3:42!

It's a shame there aren't more of Ryun's races for all to view on Youtube. I think a lot of splits claimed for him were probably taken by hand and without video evidence are somewhat unreliable.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gh » Mon May 28, 2012 2:01 pm

what Ryun splits are you challenging?
gh
 
Posts: 46295
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby Marlow » Mon May 28, 2012 2:39 pm

gh wrote:what Ryun splits are you challenging?

Is not his last lap in the 3:51.1 the fastest ever in a Mile WR?
Marlow
 
Posts: 21076
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Mon May 28, 2012 3:55 pm

Marlow wrote:-
Is not his last lap in the 3:51.1 the fastest ever in a Mile WR?


No. And that's exactly what I mean about conflicting stats. It's late here in the Uk, so I haven't got time at moment to go into details, but Ryun's last 440 in that 2nd mile WR is often given as 52.5!! This is even the time given in the IAAF WR Progression book that I have.
Fortunately the video for this race, one of the few Ryun runs there seems to be in the public domain at least, clearly shows him going through the bell in 2:57.3, giving him a last lap (440yds) of 53.8. While still an excellent time, it is still 1.3 secs out on what is often given, and is slower than Cram's 53.2 in his 3:46.32 Mile WR.

Another example is his 1500WR. I have a book called "The Milers" (Cordner Nelson & Roberto Quercetani)which was published by T&FN, and I presume is taken directly from the pages of T&FN.
In it it says: - " They came around to the gun lap, with 440 yards to go, and Ryun's time was 2.39.2" Now if that is with a lap to go then his last 400m was 53.6 (1100m in 2:39.5), in the IAAF book it's given as 53.3.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Mon May 28, 2012 3:56 pm

It goes on: - "Keino was still moving strongly, past three quarters in a fast 2.55.0. At this point, going into the last backstretch, Ryun was alongside Keino, ready for his drive." Now if Ryun's time was 2.55.0 at three quarters, the same as Keino's, then that means his 1200m time was around 2.54.1. Giving him a last 300m of 39.0! This doesn’t match up with the 39.3 they mention further in the report! Or indeed the 39.6 quoted elsewhere, including the IAAF book.
Also, doesn't that 100m stretch from 1100m to 1200m, at 14.6, seem a little slow, given that the last lap was sub 54!?

Now the statistics at the end of the report:
" Ryun's last 320 yards took only 38.1 seconds (equivalent to 300 meters in 39.3). His last 440 was .. 53.9,.......And Ryun's last three fourths mile was in about 2.48.7,...." Which means a last 1200m of about 2.47.8/9 (- 0.3 per 440 to 400m) . Still amazing, but quite a way short of the 2.46.6 quoted in various other sources. As I said, the splits given for this race vary according to which supposedly reliable source you use.

The discrepancies aren't just a couple of tenths. In some instances we're talking seconds. I don't think it helps with the whole yards/metres markings. I mean a 320yd split is a strange one to have. I'd have thought it would be 330yds!?
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Mon May 28, 2012 3:58 pm

However, it is the split times given for that 3.38 race in 1967 that really doesn't quite ring true for me. He is said to have run the last 300m in 36.4, last 200m in 24.8 and last 100m in 12.4; meaning the back stretch 100m was covered in 11.6!! It's possible that the last 100m and 200m are correct, but the last 300m is about 2 seconds faster than anything Coe, EL G or Cram did over the same distance in a similar paced race. It's also interesting to note that no official 1200m time was given for that race, and the "36.4" split seems to have been arrived at due to the fact that "One expert observer timed Ryun's 100m along the backstretch in a nearly incredible 11.6 seconds". I'd be interested to know who it was that timed this split and whether he was timing from the infield or from high in the stadium/commentary box with clear markings to guide him.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Mon May 28, 2012 3:58 pm

Moreover, my suspicion that perhaps these stats are somewhat unreliable comes when in the same 3.38 race it says; " His last 400m was also fastest on record - 50.6 (One report gave his last 400 as 49.7.)"
The fact that 2 timekeepers can be almost a second out means that surely there was a bit of exaggeration and heresay taking place. If the last lap can differ by a second then why not the last 300 split also? Perhaps that 36.4 was for the last 320yds? That would be equivalent to 37.4 for the last 300m. Still unlikely, but certainly possible.

If there was a video of the race and I saw it with my own eyes and the markings and clock showed 36.4, then I would be willing to eat humble pie. But until such time I'll carry on being a bit skeptical.
That's not to say Ryun wasn't one of the most gifted athletes ever to grace a track and that he wasn't ahead of his time. I just think some stats make him out to be head and shoulders above all others, and they are not backed up with video footage to prove them correct.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby Jnathletics » Mon May 28, 2012 5:29 pm

I'm a Coe and Ryun fan, so i don't see any way possible that Ovett wins any of the races.

Ryun was before my time but my limited knowledge was he always liked a bit slower pace then specified, so he might be a bit too far back too win to many. While Coe if the race was set up right was the best in his day of kicking off good paces. Therefore, I would go with Coe 6, Ryun 3 and Ovett gets 1 (every dog has his day.) :wink: Just can't overcome my biased in this situation, as Coe was my idol growing up.
Jnathletics
 
Posts: 2213
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Cross Country Mudville

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Tue May 29, 2012 7:06 am

the input on this thread goes a long way toward explaining in my mind why coe never ran close to his potential in terms of time for the mile.

the hypothetical 800m in 140.5 equates to a 341 mile and 325 1500m
check it.
http://www.iaaf.org/mm/Document/Competi ... _23299.pdf

so yes, i think projecting el-g like times for a peak coe is in order.
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby kuha » Tue May 29, 2012 7:29 am

gibson wrote:the input on this thread goes a long way toward explaining in my mind why coe never ran close to his potential in terms of time for the mile.

the hypothetical 800m in 140.5 equates to a 341 mile and 325 1500m
check it.
http://www.iaaf.org/mm/Document/Competi ... _23299.pdf

so yes, i think projecting el-g like times for a peak coe is in order.


??

What do equivalence scores mean? Numbers don't hurt and sweat; people do. Coe certainly ran near his potential at 800m. At the mile, sure, he was probably a second or two shy of what might have been possible under perfect conditions--but 6 seconds? Come on.
kuha
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby Conor Dary » Tue May 29, 2012 8:17 am

kuha wrote:
gibson wrote:the input on this thread goes a long way toward explaining in my mind why coe never ran close to his potential in terms of time for the mile.

the hypothetical 800m in 140.5 equates to a 341 mile and 325 1500m
check it.
http://www.iaaf.org/mm/Document/Competi ... _23299.pdf

so yes, i think projecting el-g like times for a peak coe is in order.


??

What do equivalence scores mean? Numbers don't hurt and sweat; people do. Coe certainly ran near his potential at 800m. At the mile, sure, he was probably a second or two shy of what might have been possible under perfect conditions--but 6 seconds? Come on.


Considering when Coe ran 3:47:33 he had a rabbit, Bolt, a decent pace and looked like he was going all out at the end, so, yea, 6 seconds is a bit over the top.

You have to take these scoring tables equivalents with a huge grain of salt.
Conor Dary
 
Posts: 6297
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: कनोर दारी in Ronald MacDonald's Home Town, and once a Duck always a Duck.

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby kuha » Tue May 29, 2012 8:39 am

Conor Dary wrote:
kuha wrote:
gibson wrote:the input on this thread goes a long way toward explaining in my mind why coe never ran close to his potential in terms of time for the mile.

the hypothetical 800m in 140.5 equates to a 341 mile and 325 1500m
check it.
http://www.iaaf.org/mm/Document/Competi ... _23299.pdf

so yes, i think projecting el-g like times for a peak coe is in order.


??

What do equivalence scores mean? Numbers don't hurt and sweat; people do. Coe certainly ran near his potential at 800m. At the mile, sure, he was probably a second or two shy of what might have been possible under perfect conditions--but 6 seconds? Come on.


Considering when Coe ran 3:47:33 he had a rabbit, Bolt, a decent pace and looked like he was going all out at the end, so, yea, 6 seconds is a bit over the top.

You have to take these scoring tables equivalents with a huge grain of salt.


The scoring tables are NOT predictive for any individual. They simply reflect relative equivalencies--that is, X is equal in quality to Y. One can come up with equivalencies for the mile and the discus, or the steeple and the high jump--but it doesn't mean that any one person can actually achieve them.
kuha
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Tue May 29, 2012 2:27 pm

Conor Dary wrote:-
Considering when Coe ran 3:47:33 he had a rabbit, Bolt, a decent pace and looked like he was going all out at the end, so, yea, 6 seconds is a bit over the top.


Yes, 6 seconds is not realistic, but he was certainly capable of much faster than the 3:47 he ran that night. For a start he had a lot left, only really turning it on in the last 100m, which was his fastest 100m of the whole race ~ 13.1. He was getting quicker and quicker in the last straight, and ran the last 40m in 5.1, that's 12.7 pace for 100m. Compare this to Ovett's last 100m (14.4) in his 3:48.4 WR earlier that week or indeed El G's 13.7 with Ngeny right behind him in his WR run. In a world record run at the mile the athlete is (or should be) slowing down over the last 100. Coe was speeding up!

After the race Coe said he wanted to leave a little left for the last 100 as Boit was still in contention at the bell. He certainly lacked a little courage, probably because he ran the distance so rarely, but said he believed had he gone "all out" at the bell, he'd have run 3:46.5 that night.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Tue May 29, 2012 2:29 pm

Secondly, the pace provided by Byers was not efficient at all, and certainly not a "decent" pace: - 54.9 for first 1/4, with Coe in 55.3. Coe was then taken to 880 in 1:53.3. A 55.3 followed by a 58.0 is not good pacing. That was then followed by a 58.6. Coe reached 3/4 in 2:51.9 and taking his word that he could have gone 3:46.5 off that, that would have meant a last 440 of 54.6 (54.3 for last 400m).

Now compare this to EL G's very even laps of 55.6, 56.2, 56.1 & 55.2. That's decent pacing, with less than 1 sec between each 1/4. Even Cram's 3:46.3 had more efficient pacing with
57.2, 57.3 & 58.6. A difference of 1.4 on the first 3 laps. That's a pretty comfortable base to launch a last lap of 53.2 from. Coe's first 3 laps differed by 3.3.

If one believes Coe's own words, and the stats of the last 100 would appear to give credence to that, then evened out, Coe's 3:46.5 works out at 3:46.0. If one then considers he was in front at 1000m and received no drafting for the 200m segment to the bell which most records receive (e,g Cram and EL G) then another 0.5 can be taken off. It gives a time of c. 3:45.5 for that run that night. With a few attempts at it in that kind of form I see no reason why he couldn't have gone sub 3:45.0. This also fits in with his 3:31.9 solo run in Stockholm that year being worth around 3:28.3 (= 3:44.9 for mile) with even pace & drafting to the bell.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Tue May 29, 2012 2:31 pm

3:41 ...NO. But 3:44 was definitely within his compass in 81. Perhaps the other posters were alluding to the potential of what Coe might have done in the years following ~ 82 & 83 ~ with a few changes in his training focused on purely the mile, had he not had the misfortune of injury and more detrimentally, illness in the years that followed!? After all, anyone capable of 1:41 flat (in 81) and the endurance to win 2 successive 1500 Olympics with rounds on the back of an 800m, should have felt comfortable going through 880 in 1:52 and carrying on for another 2 laps at the same sort of pace.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Thu May 31, 2012 2:49 am

steve-o from the beginning was easily the best in positioning and drafting.
and coe, just terrible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wYYu4nz ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjuU-OL2OQQ

the only race i've seen steve blow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt7z5aQS ... re=related
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Thu May 31, 2012 3:19 am

gibson wrote: -
the only race i've seen steve blow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt7z5aQS ... re=related


Really!?
I think his worst tactical race ever was the 83 Worlds. He really should have won that one. His positioning and tactics, running several metres further on the last 600m than those ahead of him, was Coe like in its inefficiency. It was almost as bad as Coe's Moscow 800 and Stuttgart 1500 in giving himself literally no chance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyHiAWvVgK4
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Thu May 31, 2012 6:18 am

What do equivalence scores mean? Numbers don't hurt and sweat; people do. Coe certainly ran near his potential at 800m. At the mile, sure, he was probably a second or two shy -but 6 seconds? Come on.


Considering when Coe ran 3:47:33 he had a rabbit, a decent pace and looked like he was going all out at the end, so, yea, 6 seconds is a bit over the top.


You have to take these scoring tables equivalents with a huge grain of salt


here is where that crazy best case scenario speculation of 6 seconds improvement comes from.

1 - draft properly, behind a decent rabbit, not in lane 2 beside a lousy one.
2- run even splits and don't run wide, coe often runs on the outside of lane 1 even when alone
3 - expected improvement lost due to injury and illness in 82-83

check out coe's 332 in 1984 after a couple of bad years- after 800 and 1500 rounds while committing all the time wasting sins listed..
= running wide, refusing to draft, looking around, uneven pace = gold medal!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOVVLrz2fq4

now imagine 1983 being a solid year and add that to the 1984 ability,
then take away the rounds, have a johnny grey taking coe to 600m in 114,
then what happens?
and a steve scott taking coe to the 1200m in 55 + 55 + 56
then what happens?

and hey, the iaaf tables are not all that bad.
check out moorcroft pb
349 mile - 732 3000m and 1300 5000.
now check the tables.
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Thu May 31, 2012 8:20 am

further to the "sub-optimal" 1984 la run.
what did coe do the week before to "prepare" for the 1500 in 3:32?
here are the "workouts"
3 August 1984 800m 1:45.71
4 August 1984 800m 1:46.75
5 August 1984 800m 1:45.51
6 August 1984 800m 1:43.64 :!:
7-8 August - rest.
9 August 1984 1500m 3:45.30
10 August 1984 1500m 3:35.81
11 August 1984 1500m 3:32.53 :!:

how many meters extra did he run?
several
how many times did he chop his stride?
couple of times
was the pace uneven?
there were two mid race surges followed by a very fast last lap
did coe have something left in the tank?
looks like it. watch coe give a murderous look and a few F***** yous to the press, then jog about, while the others are wasted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddrxCe3ZOOM
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Thu May 31, 2012 9:04 am

coe running wide yet again. and he still gets in trouble with elbows in the stretch.
all coe had to do was draft off favorite cruz as ovett would have done if he was up to snuff.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BABr2DA26Xw&feature=related
the margin of victory by cruz is roughly equivalent to the extra distance coe traveled.
cruz however deserves victory not only for having run the better race but for having run the greatest series of 800m races ever.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athletics_ ... _Olympics_–_Men%27s_800_metre
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Thu May 31, 2012 2:32 pm

gibson wrote: -
here is where that crazy best case scenario speculation of 6 seconds improvement comes from.
1 - draft properly, behind a decent rabbit, not in lane 2 beside a lousy one.
2- run even splits and don't run wide, coe often runs on the outside of lane 1 even when alone
3 - expected improvement lost due to injury and illness in 82-83

check out coe's 332 in 1984 after a couple of bad years- after 800 and 1500 rounds while committing all the time wasting sins listed..
= running wide, refusing to draft, looking around, uneven pace = gold medal!



You have a valid point. Coe often ran wide in lane 1 for no apparent reason, even when he was ahead or alone in that space. E.g. Rieti 86.
I remember he ran the first 5 bends wide of Byers during his 1st mile WR of 81 in Zurich. Thus he ran about 1.5m further every bend, which = 1.0 sec. Coe received no drafting for the first 1000m because he was not directly behind Byers. When he did hit the front, he ran the last 600m alone. At this level an athlete would generally expect to be taken to 1200m with drafting. The benefit of drafting is generally regarded as 1.0sec per 400m. So, on this day in Zurich, had he been directly behind a rabbit for 3 laps he should have been at least 2.5s faster. Add this to the 1.0s lost by running wide & we see that Coe could have run 3:45.0 that day!
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby deanouk » Thu May 31, 2012 2:33 pm

Together with the evidence from the Stockholm 1500 & the Brussels Mile, Coe was capable of 3:28 low & 3:44 high that summer. Had he made several attempts then possibly 3:27 high, 3:44 low. It is probable he would have continued to improve in the 2 seasons that followed (82/83) as 25/26 is usually the age when most mid-dist runners peak. Without the illnesses then it is plausible Coe would have approached the times EL G were to run 20 years later.

As for the LA 800 final, I've been saying for a while that Cruz & Coe were much more evenly matched than the result reveals. Coe ran on his outside for practically the entire race and covered an extra 7m. Cruz himself ran an extra 2.5m further. Their adjusted times based on that were Cruz 1:42.6, Coe 1:42.7, and that doesn't take the clash of elbows between Coe And Jones into consideration, which knocked Coe off his stride at a crucial point about 80m from home.
deanouk
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:15 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:29 am

Rieti 1986 - Sebastian Coe - m.1500 - 3'29"77
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsHwft0p99g

another goofy record attempt.
it is not hard to see 327 off good rabbiting, provided coe would cooperate.
and this is probably not even coe at his best, let alone considering the best case scenario...of avoiding injury in the peak of his career.

by the way, lagat's pr in the mile is 347. no doubt in the right race, say like drafting off el-g he'd go 343.
lagat did get in the perfect draft in this one = 326 for the 1500m
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9pIdiU4IAU

coe never got in the right race, just like lagat never got in the right mile race.
and a peak coe, while not better than el-g could "easily" win by drafting as lagat did.
= 325.

if el-g could draft off himself, he'd go 324.
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Sat Jun 02, 2012 8:20 am

deanouk wrote:gibson wrote: -
the only race i've seen steve blow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt7z5aQS ... re=related


Really!?
I think his worst tactical race ever was the 83 Worlds. He really should have won that one. His positioning and tactics, running several metres further on the last 600m than those ahead of him, was Coe like in its inefficiency. It was almost as bad as Coe's Moscow 800 and Stuttgart 1500 in giving himself literally no chance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyHiAWvVgK4


awesome race, and right, if you sit and kick cookie cutter races100 percent of the time, you should get boxed and burned in a quality field from time to time. the racers in this field were of a much superior caliber than earlier in his carear, notice after the 1000m free ride and some running in traffic, ovett makes up no ground in the last 120m.
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:06 am

gibson wrote:
deanouk wrote:gibson wrote: -
the only race i've seen steve blow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt7z5aQS ... re=related


Really!?
I think his worst tactical race ever was the 83 Worlds. He really should have won that one. His positioning and tactics, running several metres further on the last 600m than those ahead of him, was Coe like in its inefficiency. It was almost as bad as Coe's Moscow 800 and Stuttgart 1500 in giving himself literally no chance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyHiAWvVgK4


thanks for the schooling.

awesome race, if you run sit and kick cookie cutter races100 percent of the time, you should get boxed and burned in a quality field from time to time. the racers in this field were of a much superior caliber than earlier in his carear, notice after the 1000m free ride and runs what, 52 ? last quarter with some running in traffic, yet ovett makes up no ground in the last 120m.

over the course of researching this thread, i've become more impressed with both coe and ovett.
for example here is a windy 330. and run in from 500 out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL_WektvHo4

for those who want snell in the race, see a high school ryan take out snell a year after his gold medal run... and snells time in this race was something like the his third best of his carear....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E-R97LShwA
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Re: Coe v Ovett v Ryun: 10 races

Postby gibson » Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:15 am

how to run a solo world record, ryan style
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlwS0Fyq ... re=related
gibson
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 am

Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests