JLightnin' that is so true. Mitchell was a good starter ,but I don't see how people could think Mitchell was better on the curve. You take their times on a 200. The first 100 MJ was definitely faster. MJ usually lead off the turn. So what makes people believe that Mitchell can beat Johnson , when Mitchell was a better starter than MJ? I know people are going to say MJ never ran that fast again, but he also didn't run the 4x100 at his peak either. So I think you would see a turn close to Atlanta's 10.12 ,but with a running start: That's a definite advantage to MJ!