Return to Current Events

¶2012 OG: wLJ–Brittney Reese (US) 23-4½ (7.12)

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

¶2012 OG: wLJ–Brittney Reese (US) 23-4½ (7.12)

Postby dj » Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:13 pm

T&FN formchart advancers to final

1. Brittney Reese (USA)
2. Nastassia Ivanova (Belarus)
3. Shara Proctor (Great Britain)
4. Janay DeLoach (USA)
5. Yelena Sokolova (Russia)

6. Blessing Okagbare (Nigeria)
7. Anna Nazarova (Russia)
8. Viktoriya Rybalko (Ukraine)
9. Chelsea Hayes (USA)
10. Lyudmila Kolchanova (Russia)
dj
 
Posts: 5886
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby GDAWG » Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:06 pm

While I believe that Reese wins gold, I do hope she's not the first American to win gold.
GDAWG
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby j-a-m » Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:25 pm

mLJ and wTJ were mostly into a headwind, guess we can expect the same here.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby j-a-m » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:50 am

Four automatic qualifiers so far, including DeLoach. Reese seems to have two fouls, though.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby j-a-m » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:04 am

Okagbare and Hayes are out.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby t_monk » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:05 am

j-a-m wrote:Four automatic qualifiers so far, including DeLoach. Reese seems to have two fouls, though.

Her first two jumps were both huge.... She just needs to be conservative on her third jump and she should easily be in
t_monk
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:03 pm
Location: New Haven, CT + Kgn, JA

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby j-a-m » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:12 am

t_monk wrote:Her first two jumps were both huge.... She just needs to be conservative on her third jump and she should easily be in

Reese seems to be just in with a conservative third jump.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby Barto » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:19 am

6.40m to make the finals? Conditions must be deplorable. Stat geeks, is this the weakest final ever?
Barto
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby j-a-m » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:20 am

6.57 were enough for Reese, tied for 8th
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby j-a-m » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:22 am

Barto wrote:6.40m to make the finals? Conditions must be deplorable. Stat geeks, is this the weakest final ever?

Don't know, but LJ and TJ competitions have been weak all week long; seems the stadium isn't build for horizontal jumpers.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby uakari » Tue Aug 07, 2012 1:15 pm

havent' seen the video yet but these olympics are not blessed for blessing...
uakari
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby errolM » Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:11 pm

j-a-m wrote:Don't know, but LJ and TJ competitions have been weak all week long; seems the stadium isn't build for horizontal jumpers.


You keep saying this and I'm not sure why.

14.98 wTJ is class in any conditions. 8.31 into a headwind for Rutherford - 4cm down on his PB - is not be sniffed at either. mTJ qualifying was a bit meh true, but that was probably the coldest session all games.

Don't blame the stadium, blame the athletes.
errolM
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:05 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby GDAWG » Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:12 pm

j-a-m wrote:Okagbare and Hayes are out.


Hasn't been a good Olympics for Okagbare.
GDAWG
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–

Postby nevetsllim » Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:48 pm

j-a-m wrote:
Barto wrote:6.40m to make the finals? Conditions must be deplorable. Stat geeks, is this the weakest final ever?

Don't know, but LJ and TJ competitions have been weak all week long; seems the stadium isn't build for horizontal jumpers.


Week all long? They've been weak all season! The men's long jump isn't going through a vintage period and we haven't seen a 15m-plus triple jump for a few years outdoors although Rypakova said she had a narrow foul which was in the 15.10-15.20m range.
nevetsllim
 
Posts: 6102
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:54 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby j-a-m » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:24 am

Reese 7.12 in her second attempt, following a foul in her first.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby mump boy » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:26 am

Imagine what she'll do when she learns how to jump :shock:
mump boy
 
Posts: 5116
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby j-a-m » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:31 am

Sokolova 7.07 in 2nd attempt
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby EPelle » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:32 am

Sokolova out to 7.07.
EPelle
 
Posts: 21036
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby Gabriella » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:52 am

Erm, did anyone see Deloach's 2nd round foul? I swear it wasn't a foul, and it looked huge around 7.30 :shock: but she accepted the judge's ruling :evil:
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby shivfan » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:54 am

So sad for proctor....
:(
shivfan
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Just outside London

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby j-a-m » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:24 pm

Bronze for DeLoach
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby j-a-m » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:25 pm

Gold for Reese ahead of Sokolova.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby CookyMonzta » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:29 pm

One jump. Only one needed to get it done. Which has exemplified the career of Brittney Reese right up to this point.
CookyMonzta
 
Posts: 2140
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby highjumpfan » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:45 pm

CookyMonzta wrote:One jump. Only one needed to get it done. Which has exemplified the career of Brittney Reese right up to this point.


Actually the career of Brittney Reese has shown a steady improvement both technically and results wise. While she will never be accused of being Carl Lewis technically, she has come a long way from the woman who practically landed vertical in the pit. As a result she has dramatically improved her PR and is now threatening to move into territory not seen since the late 80's early 90's.

Also she happens to be the victor of the last five world titles indoors and out. Not too shabby.

Congrats Brittney, now if only you would pick up the shot put we can talk Rio!
highjumpfan
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: right where I'm supposed to be.

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby Daisy » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:22 pm

highjumpfan wrote:She has come a long way from the woman who practically landed vertical in the pit.

Very true, her consistency is much better.
Daisy
 
Posts: 12727
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby tm71 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:16 pm

CookyMonzta wrote:One jump. Only one needed to get it done. Which has exemplified the career of Brittney Reese right up to this point.


Regardless of her consistency and fouling problems she has won all of the big competitions available to her since the last olympics
tm71
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby Gabriella » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:51 am

What I found interesting was both Sokolova and Nazarova didn't like the crowd clapping and wanted them to be quiet. I guess it's an individual preference, but funny how they were both Russian - I wonder if they're in Moscow 2013 will their own crowd be happy clappy or more sombre?

Once again, Kolchanova disapponints. The Russian selectors missed a trick not sending Kucherenko who I'm sure would have done much better.

I'm going to look at my replay on the BBC for Deloach's 2nd rd fould to check whether my eyes were deceiving me that it was a huge jump.
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby croflash » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:13 am

Gabriella wrote:What I found interesting was both Sokolova and Nazarova didn't like the crowd clapping and wanted them to be quiet. I guess it's an individual preference, but funny how they were both Russian - I wonder if they're in Moscow 2013 will their own crowd be happy clappy or more sombre?

Once again, Kolchanova disapponints. The Russian selectors missed a trick not sending Kucherenko who I'm sure would have done much better.

I'm going to look at my replay on the BBC for Deloach's 2nd rd fould to check whether my eyes were deceiving me that it was a huge jump.


It was a huge foul, probably more than 7.12m. I'm pretty sure I have seen such close attempts being counted before.

Here is a pic of that attempt: http://s14.directupload.net/images/120809/juqjkpan.png
croflash
 
Posts: 2190
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:29 am
Location: Germany

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby Gabriella » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:46 am

To my eyes that's a valid jump. And it was huge. She should have protested and insisted they measure it but she didn't even challenge the decision. That was a gold medal winning jump!
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby pakillo » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:12 am

I thought Sokolova's 7.07 was a foul.
pakillo
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:05 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby CookyMonzta » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:21 pm

If they called DeLoach's jump a foul, it was most likely because she left a mark on the orange strip. Did the officials take a closer look?
CookyMonzta
 
Posts: 2140
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby Alan Shank » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:28 pm

Gabriella wrote:To my eyes that's a valid jump. And it was huge. She should have protested and insisted they measure it but she didn't even challenge the decision. That was a gold medal winning jump!


It's the plasticine, not your eyes. There was one jump where the athlete went over to the judge and he showed him/her the mark; it was very close, but foul. I can't even remember whether it was a female long jumper or a male triple jumper. (Was it Reese?)

Nice comethrough jump for DeLoach, in any case, for the bronze.
Cheers,
Alan Shank
Alan Shank
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: N38 40, W 121 52

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby lonewolf » Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:42 pm

Gabriella wrote:To my eyes that's a valid jump. And it was huge. She should have protested and insisted they measure it but she didn't even challenge the decision. That was a gold medal winning jump!

I had not seen that foot placement. If there was no mark in the plasticine, in accordance with the unwritten "ties go to the jumper" rule, I would have called the jump fair.
lonewolf
 
Posts: 8003
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Indian Territory

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby Alan Shank » Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:55 am

lonewolf wrote:
Gabriella wrote:To my eyes that's a valid jump. And it was huge. She should have protested and insisted they measure it but she didn't even challenge the decision. That was a gold medal winning jump!

I had not seen that foot placement. If there was no mark in the plasticine, in accordance with the unwritten "ties go to the jumper" rule, I would have called the jump fair.


Not sure about DeLoach's long foul, but on the one I was referring to they showed a closeup, and there was definitely a mark in the plasticine, albeit very, very close to the front.
Cheers,
Alan Shank
Alan Shank
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: N38 40, W 121 52

Re: 2012 OG: wLJ–Shara Proctor (GB) leads Q at 22-5 (6.83)

Postby dj » Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:59 am

Alan Shank wrote:
Gabriella wrote:To my eyes that's a valid jump. And it was huge. She should have protested and insisted they measure it but she didn't even challenge the decision. That was a gold medal winning jump!


It's the plasticine, not your eyes. There was one jump where the athlete went over to the judge and he showed him/her the mark; it was very close, but foul. I can't even remember whether it was a female long jumper or a male triple jumper. (Was it Reese?)

Nice comethrough jump for DeLoach, in any case, for the bronze.
Cheers,
Alan Shank


It was Claye's first round TJ foul on which he asked to see the mark.
dj
 
Posts: 5886
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Next

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DrJay, eldanielfire, Loggins, norunner and 19 guests