Return to Current Events

¶2012 OG: wHJ–Anna Chicherova (Russia) 6-8¾ (2.05)

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

¶2012 OG: wHJ–Anna Chicherova (Russia) 6-8¾ (2.05)

Postby dj » Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:48 pm

T&FN formchart advancers to final

1. Anna Chicherova (Russia)
2. Chaunté Lowe (USA)
3. Svetlana Shkolina (Russia)
4. Ruth Beitia (Spain)
5. Tia Hellebaut (Belgium)
6. Brigetta Barrett (USA)

7. Tonje Angelsen (Norway)
8. Irina Gordeyeva (Russia)
9. Emma Green Tregaro (Sweden)

10. Amy Acuff (USA)
dj
 
Posts: 5886
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Randy Treadway » Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:28 pm

The lonely women's high jump.
Nobody seems to care.
COME ON you Amy Acuff calendar fans, get this topic cranked up! (well, keep it on topic of course.) :lol:

Will the women's high jumpers have as much trouble with the wind as the pole vaulters? Or is it just that pole vaulters are brainwashed into thinking they have to wait for the wind to be just perfect?

And what about the London rain? Will we see any Dwight Stones-style squeegeeing to get the apron dry?

Is the Olympic record (2.06m) in any jeopardy here? That's about 6' 9" for those of us who still use the measuring tape that the good Lord intended. LOL - just kidding. JUST KIDDING! NO, no!- not the hot poker up the nostrils! I already gave at the office!

And the big question we all want to know, for the office pool. Which high jumper is going to pass to the highest height before entering the competition in the Final? And what height will that be?

Okay, maybe that's enough stimulus material for even you diehard fence straddlers.
Randy Treadway
 
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Marlow » Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:52 pm

It's them Commies agin us Murkans!
How will Lowe & Barr fare against Chich and Shkol?
Lowe is still coming back from maternity and Barrett is an ascendant (pun!) collegian - I like their chances.
Marlow
 
Posts: 18735
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Randy Treadway » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:24 pm

Okay high jump fans, we're down to five hours before the flag drops on this barn burner.

Do you agree with the T&FN predictions or don't ya?
As Marlow said- Commies or Murkans?
:wink:

You don't have to pick medalists (for now).. just pick the 12 finalists.

You can use whatever methodology you want. Astrology. Shoe sponsor. Their name sounds cool. Heck, if you're a *real* idiot for this stuff, you can even base it on their recent form!
Randy Treadway
 
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Per Andersen » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:38 pm

T&FN's top 6 seems reasonable. After that, it's dicey. Angelsen is very promising but quite inexperienced.
Tregaro-Green tends to pick it up late in the season but she's been pretty lame so far. Don't expect much from Gordeyeva. She used to be almost interchangeable with Shkolina but Skholina has developed into a contender this year.
I'll go with Chicherova over Lowe. I have a feeling Barrettt might end up higher than sixth.
Per Andersen
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby jamal00005 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:41 pm

I Really don't know squat about this event other than at diamond league meets the american always entertains
jamal00005
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:46 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby marknhj » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:19 pm

I picked: Chich - Lowe - Barrett as the medalists. Probably doomed at least one of them!
marknhj
 
Posts: 5014
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby shivfan » Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:08 am

The weather gets warm today, so it should be good for high jumping....
8-)
I went to both days of the Crystal Palace Diamond League, and my highlight was the women's high jump. It was right at my side of the stadium, and Lowe was a great entertainer, as always, beating Chicherova on the day. I'm rooting for her to get gold, and for St Lucia's Lavern Spencer to do a PB.
shivfan
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Just outside London

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Jussie » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:01 am

I am cheering for Tia...

If she fluked a win she would be the most unlikely double-gold in history, I would think.

That said, she'll be doing well to get a medal
Jussie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:07 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby shivfan » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:43 am

Chaunte Lowe bows to her adoring fans....clear at 1.93.
8-)
shivfan
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Just outside London

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby DecFan » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:46 am

Amy Acuff goes out at 1,90, fails to qualify.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby shivfan » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:53 am

DecFan wrote:Amy Acuff goes out at 1,90, fails to qualify.

So does Lavern Spencer....
:(
shivfan
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Just outside London

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:58 am

Apparently down to 14 jumpers; now there seems to be some confusion and discussion with the officials.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby BruceFlorman » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:00 am

Oh this is so comic... "All I want to know is -- jump or pass?" :lol:
BruceFlorman
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Back home again in Indiana

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:05 am

BruceFlorman wrote:Oh this is so comic... "All I want to know is -- jump or pass?" :lol:

Yeah, they've been discussing with each other and with the officials for the last ten minutes or so...
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Gabriella » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:05 am

Yes, amusing but then, ridiculous. The judges should step in and just annouce 14 through. However....some of these women are indecisive. I understand they dont want to miss out, but some are like "oo I dont want to be the first"

It sounds like 2 have elected to jump though? :?

It's hard to follow but they would be silly continuing.
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby BruceFlorman » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:09 am

Gabriella wrote:It's hard to follow but they would be silly continuing.

And so they are. :shock:
BruceFlorman
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Back home again in Indiana

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby shivfan » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:10 am

BruceFlorman wrote:Oh this is so comic... "All I want to know is -- jump or pass?" :lol:

Did Friedrich convince them to all pass?
:D
I guess not....
shivfan
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Just outside London

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:12 am

It SEEMS to be as follows: There's a tie for 13th place; so if everyone were to pass, those two would be out. So those two have to keep jumping. And in case they make it, those just ahead of them need to keep jumping as well.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby BruceFlorman » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:13 am

Evidently Friedrich herself didn't pass.

Radzivil is going to "win" the Q round. :lol:
BruceFlorman
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Back home again in Indiana

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Gabriella » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:15 am

I couldnt work out whether some wanted to carry on or whether I heard an official say "it must be 12"

It looked at one point like Steryiou wanted to carry on but she didnt understand, and Radzivil, and Ahyan's coach was instructing her something. Radzivil has cleared 1.96 now, so Friedrich will be out unless she clears 1.96 which is doubtful.

And Firedrich's out. I bet she's mad
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:15 am

Gabriella wrote:It's hard to follow but they would be silly continuing.

Had the lowest tie been for 12th or better, then everyone could've passed, and everyone would be in; so I guess they thought that would've been the situation. But instead it SEEMS there was a tie for 13th, making it necessary they continue.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby shivfan » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:15 am

Seems to me that Friedrich should've concentrated more on jumping, than on trying to be a union rep....
:)
shivfan
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Just outside London

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:18 am

shivfan wrote:Seems to me that Friedrich should've concentrated more on jumping, than on trying to be a union rep....
:)

Good point
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Gabriella » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:18 am

BruceFlorman wrote:Evidently Friedrich herself didn't pass.

Radzivil is going to "win" the Q round. :lol:


Firedrich did pass, but the offcial called her back and said one of the athletes wanted to carry on, so he let her change, which was good of him.

I bet Arianna is fuming with Radzivil! I understand you dont want competitors in the final, but it seems very unsporting to carry on and force one out
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:19 am

BruceFlorman wrote:Radzivil is going to "win" the Q round. :lol:

Last one in with the only auto qualifier...
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:21 am

Gabriella wrote:I bet Arianna is fuming with Radzivil! I understand you dont want competitors in the final, but it seems very unsporting to carry on and force one out

See my post above; based on the live results page there was a tie for 13th all along, making it necessary for the two jumpers in 13th place to continue.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:25 am

iaaf results page confirms it: 12 jumpers had cleared 1.93 in either first or second attempt, and two had cleared it in the third attempt. So those two were out of the top 12, and had to continue to have a chance to qualify.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby Gabriella » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:25 am

So, Steryiou also misses out. Neither were medal contenders so it's a shame they didnt make it.
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby aaronk » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:29 am

Yeah, that was funny to watch.....and listen to....especially with some of the girls apparently having language problems!!
They should have officials who can speak a dozen languages!!!
In the end, I blame the officials for the mix-up!!
The girls are there to compete.....not to worry about rules and regs!!!!

Next time........do it the USATF way.......flip a coin!!! :lol:
aaronk
 
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:39 am

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby BruceFlorman » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:29 am

Yeah, it's not 100% clear to me that the officials ever "offered" to let 14 through to the final. The tie at 13th was between Friedrich and Radzivil, so unless letting 14 through was on offer, Radzivil had to go again. Steryiou was ahead of them in 12th, but was "on the bubble" as the xo at 1.93 with the most prior misses, so if she'd passed, she would've needed whatever came after 1.96 to make it in.

Edit: I don't know what the rules actually state, but if they allow more than 12 into the final only when there's a tie for the 12th spot, then Steryiou got hosed by clearing 1.93 on her second attempt. If she'd instead cleared on her third attempt, then she would've been in a 3-way tie for 12th with Friedrich and Radizvil and all would've gone through. :?
BruceFlorman
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Back home again in Indiana

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby j-a-m » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:15 am

BruceFlorman wrote:Edit: I don't know what the rules actually state, but if they allow more than 12 into the final only when there's a tie for the 12th spot, then Steryiou got hosed by clearing 1.93 on her second attempt. If she'd instead cleared on her third attempt, then she would've been in a 3-way tie for 12th with Friedrich and Radizvil and all would've gone through. :?

Don't think so because she had more previous misses, which probably would've put her in 14th at that time; interesting thought nonetheless.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby pakillo » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:19 am

After ruined and boring men's final I just hope we won't see 1.95-1.99-2.02 or similar height progression in the final...
pakillo
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:05 pm

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–Dozen advance to final with 6-4 (1.93)

Postby Diego Sahagún » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:59 am

Yet in the final. Go Ruth :!: Vamos :!:
Diego Sahagún
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: 2012 OG: wHJ–

Postby BruceFlorman » Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:47 am

j-a-m wrote:Don't think so because she had more previous misses, which probably would've put her in 14th at that time; interesting thought nonetheless.

Ah, you're right. She had a miss at 1.80 and the other two were clean prior to 1.93.
BruceFlorman
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Back home again in Indiana

Next

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: booond and 19 guests