Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.
Ohio State freshman H-back Dontre Wilson, generously listed at 5-10, has a very rapid stride rate. Ran a 10.5 100 in high school in Texas.Supposedly had a 4.33 40. Fastest OSU back I ever saw was Ted Ginn Jr., who was a smooth, long strider. So was Robert Smith. Michael Johnson was listed at 6-1 but had a very high turnover too. OSU's Butch Reynolds, whose 400 WR Michael broke, had a very long stride. Mechanically, are runners somewhat prisoners of their size? Is a high turnover less efficient than a long stride? Info appreciated.
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
fieldguy wrote:are runners somewhat prisoners of their size? Is a high turnover less efficient than a long stride? Info appreciated.
Appearances are deceiving. What often appears to be short, choppy strides are actually covering a lot of ground because the runner is striking the ground with such force that they are being propelled up and forward, covering sufficient space to achieve a high velocity. Bolt has both; great power and long legs. Football players and short-race sprinters (<
60m) definitely want to maximize stride frequency, but 100m and up requires great stride length also.
- Posts: 21088
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: aaronk, Bing [Bot], Bruce Kritzler, bushop, nztrackfan, steveu, wineturtle and 16 guests