¶USATF Dec: Ashton Eaton 8291


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby Dave » Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:10 am

Eaton 10.48. Not seeing a WR here, but who knows.
Dave
 
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:16 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:11 am

My projections (not predictions) after 1 event (leaving Eaton out . . .)

Nixon 8224
Taiwo 8211
Murphy 8034
Moss 8025
Keys 7930
Horn 7885
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby booond » Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:13 am

DecFan wrote:
booond wrote:Barring an injury, who has a chance to wedge themselves into the top-3 ahead of either Nixon or Taiwo?


Grey Horn is a possibility. PRs sum over 8300, but he has never put together 10 good events in one decathlon. JT is the biggest question mark for him. His PR is over 56m, but in his two decathlons this spring he threw around 48 and 45. If he can go 10.9 7.5 13.7 2.05 in the first four events, he'll be in contention.

Miller Moss is a more likely possibility. PRs sum to 8462. Hasn't competed much in the last two years with injuries, but had an 8000+ score going this spring before a disastrous JT, and didn't run the 1500. Look today particularly at his HJ - 2.04 PR, but only jumped 1.93 in his spring decathlon.

Then there's Isaac Murphy. PRs sum just over 8300, and he seems a bit more consistent than Horn or Moss. Had an outstanding NCAA meet to score 8086 and take 4th, though compared to PRs did relatively poorly in the 1500 there. The first two events today will be telling for him: If he can go under 10.6 and over 7.4, he'll be in great position.


Thanks.
booond
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:25 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:16 am

And a similar set of projections, for contrast:

Ashton Eaton 9051
Gunnar Nixon 8141
Jeremy Taiwo 8086
Isaac Murphy 7931
Gray Horn 7925
Miller Moss 7919
Dakotah Keys 7914
Jon Ryan Harlan 7863
Jake Arnold 7774

If we take the 100m performance as indicative of fitness, then Nixon and Horn look particularly sharp (so we can revise expectations upwards), and Eaton seems off, which could be simply a conservative approach. But WR, that projection above notwithstanding, seems unlikely, on the strength of the first event.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby Dave » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:00 am

TimRoy wrote:And a similar set of projections, for contrast:

Ashton Eaton 9051
Gunnar Nixon 8141
Jeremy Taiwo 8086
Isaac Murphy 7931
Gray Horn 7925
Miller Moss 7919
Dakotah Keys 7914
Jon Ryan Harlan 7863
Jake Arnold 7774

If we take the 100m performance as indicative of fitness, then Nixon and Horn look particularly sharp (so we can revise expectations upwards), and Eaton seems off, which could be simply a conservative approach. But WR, that projection above notwithstanding, seems unlikely, on the strength of the first event.


Eaton's first jump is pretty lackluster(for him) with 7.59. The wind is a slight tail wind so I wonder if something else is holding him back.
Dave
 
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:16 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:03 am

Nixon is the only decathlete to exceed my projections on the first jump. He's looking good.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:08 am

DecFan wrote:Nixon is the only decathlete to exceed my projections on the first jump. He's looking good.


Agreed. And the other jumpers have been, across the board, terrible (relative to each person's usual level) - some 70-150 points below expected. There must be some explanation for why everyone (except Nixon) has started poorly.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:19 am

Woah! Big Pr for Nixon, 7.62. Projects up to 8291 now!
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:24 am

And I know that Nixon can do even better.
Maybe not yet, but he rans 60m in 6.86 and jumps 2.17 high. Healthy and with the right technique theese are the tools for an 8m jumper
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:26 am

Nixon is the story right now, leaping a pb when everyone else in contention is well down on their usual. He's on pace for the A, and second place to Eaton. Great to see - a very likeable young up-and-comer. Of course, still 8 events to go.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:27 am

Eaton passes his 3rd jump, leaving his best at 7.59. Something must not be quite right.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby nbonaddio » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:28 am

Just to sate my curiosity, what was the reasoning behind his leaving Arkansas? Just wanted to train full-time and not have to worry about all the class and grind of an NCAA schedule?
nbonaddio
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:36 am

DecFan wrote:Eaton passes his 3rd jump, leaving his best at 7.59. Something must not be quite right.


I understand your concern, but note that everyone is down (except for Nixon)

Eaton is down 100 points
Hardee is down 130 points
Taiwo is down 100 points
Keys is down 120 points
Harlan is down 90 points
Murphy is down 160 points
Arnold is down 70 points
Bahner is down 60 points.

Something is not quite right, it seems, but it's affecting many more than just Eaton. The Long Jump has been a debacle for those hoping to score big.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:38 am

Poor event for many, but worst for Taiwo. He had a decent opening jump, but then had two fouls - the last by only about a cm - and so loses much compared to projections. Murphy also was way off. Only Nixon and Horn exceeded my projections.

After 2 events:
Nixon 8291
Taiwo 8070
Moss 7958
Horn 7895
Murphy 7873
Keys 7809
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:40 am

TimRoy wrote:
DecFan wrote:Eaton passes his 3rd jump, leaving his best at 7.59. Something must not be quite right.


I understand your concern, but note that everyone is down (except for Nixon)



"Something must not be quite right" because of his choosing to pass when he hadn't jumped within 60cm of his PR, not because of the distance.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:01 am

I see your distinction.

I attribute the decision to pass to his looking at results down across the board, and to the likely strategy adopted entering the meet of doing only as much as necessary, which his 7.59 certainly achieved. But perhaps there's something deeper.

A contrasting set of projections:

Ashton Eaton 8946
Gunnar Nixon 8220
Jeremy Taiwo 7981
Gray Horn 7911
Miller Moss 7878
Dakotah Keys 7793
Jon Ryan Harlan 7777
Isaac Murphy 7770
Jake Arnold 7706
Austin Bahner 7599

My predictions would have Eaton and Taiwo down on that, and Nixon and Horn (and perhaps Moss) higher.

The team for Moscow looks like Hardee (wildcard), Eaton, Nixon (on pace for the A), and either Taiwo (on the strength of his previous A) or Horn or Moss, if one of those two can both beat Taiwo and exceed the B, 8,000. There's some drama left, but the wind is out of the sails after the long jump, except to see how well Nixon can do.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby tm71 » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:02 am

DecFan wrote:Eaton passes his 3rd jump, leaving his best at 7.59. Something must not be quite right.



seems like hardee is having a training session which is understandable since he has the wild card. eaton is just going thru the motions to make the team since he knows that no more than two others could go over 8200. i agree that WR is totally out of the question, in fact i dont think he will score over 8700 which is still a great score for anyone else but him.
tm71
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:07 am

So if Eaton is physically OK and his goal is just to make the team, why even making a 2nd attempt after 7.59 in the 1st?
I'm sorry but him being slightly injured to me appears very likely when trying to read something in this decision.
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby Jackaloupe » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:13 am

Disappointed as I was to not see a better start--100m was lackluster, but "self-contained" also covers it--not too much should be read into the LJ: First jump, w/ +1.6 wind, was not that bad, if losing plenty w/ leg drop; second had neg. wind (-1.0?); so in view of nearly everyone else sub-par, and the wind continuing negative, it was a sensible decision, esp. since WR was no longer a consideration, and the LJ can be hazardous.
Edit: As to "why take 2nd jump?" Why not, as 26 ft. is routine for AE, just didn't happen. After that, ~25 ft., w/ wind continuing negative, suddenly looked good enough, so it no longer made sense to go for more; nor were additional points looking at all necessary.

I'd say we're back in WorkOut mode: looking for consistency ~15m in SP, somewhere N of 205 in HJ, after starting ~195 (Will they use 3 cm increments?), w. close attention to that li'l knee tendon. Level of effort in 400m will be interesting: I'd expect high 46, going out in that same relaxed 23ish, and holding it, maybe even looking around.

[Now w/ Weather Alert, the Pass is looking downright prescient, although raindrops could be seen, and maybe heavy clouds on the horizon.] Hope those dozen or so spectators come back. Latest announcement: Stadium reopening @ 12:29 (My, aren't we precise!?!) But what's with that "15 minutes for warmups". Seems fair to give Decathletes time for a general warmup before SP warmups, per se; but maybe that's what they meant. Since they're over in the Fieldhouse, keeping warm shouldn't be a problem.
Last edited by Jackaloupe on Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jackaloupe
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:33 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:16 am

My take was that the B-standard is just something to allow a country to send at least one athlete in case no athlete in this country has reached the A-Standard.
Since Eaton (2012) and Taiwo (2013) do already have the A-Standard, the B-standard to my understanding is useless and does not allow to send an additional athlete.
Am I wrong and are you guys sure in terms of the B-Standard?
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby tm71 » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:19 am

eiluke wrote:My take was that the B-standard is just something to allow a country to send at least one athlete in case no athlete in this country has reached the A-Standard.
Since Eaton (2012) and Taiwo (2013) do already have the A-Standard, the B-standard to my understanding is useless and does not allow to send an additional athlete.
Am I wrong and are you guys sure in terms of the B-Standard?



two As and one B can go along with hardee in this event
tm71
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:20 am

I believe you are wrong in the case of the Worlds (with the Olympics, it was a different rule): you can take up to three athletes (exclusive of wild cards), only one of which can be a B.

Finishing top three at the trials is given priority, so if, for example, Horn finishes 3rd, and has a B standard, he'd go to Moscow ahead of Taiwo, with his A (assuming Eaton and Nixon finish 1-2 with A standards). If Nixon finished 2nd with a B, that would bump Horn out, and Taiwo back in.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby Marlow » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:23 am

Marlow wrote:Will Eaton just go through the motions here (8600) or try to bust one as he did at the Trials?

I think my question has been answered.
Marlow
 
Posts: 21126
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:26 am

thanks tm71.

This makes me wondering why Beach did not try to start.
8200 would have been too much of a hurdle, but this way Beach even throwing jav with the the wrong arm would have had a small chance to make the team, since he already has B-standard
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby 26mi235 » Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:34 am

Jackaloupe wrote: (Will they use 3 cm increments?)


Yes, HJ always 3 cm and PV 10cm. No 'choice' for the winning athlete because there is no 'winning' the HJ or PV.

With a head wind and an adequate LJ and a moderate 100, the cards were not going to lead to a WR (or even a meet record :wink: ) and so he will just go through to get a decent score. I suppose he might push enough so that if he gets a nm in a throw he might still make the team (have to beat the second B etc.).
26mi235
 
Posts: 16335
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:17 am

Well, Eaton with a big 15.00 SP. Will that be his last put?
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby ptn » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:20 am

ok that convinced me there is no major injury. :)
ptn
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 10:17 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby Jackaloupe » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:22 am

Eaton just tossed 15.0m in SP opener: misannounced as a PR, after previously citing a mark that must've been Decathlon-only. The flaky USATF.TV coverage missed the actual throw, favoring Jr. 1500m W Heats, despite the announcer's, "Here's Ashton Eaton".

Their 100m coverage was pretty bad, switching mid-race; worse in LJ, w/ the switch at first immediately after takeoff, then moving to a somewhat better quarter-face on as jumpers approached the board.

"Last Put"? Hope that was sarcasm, as no way would Eaton/Marra pass up on this key "training" in the Weights. Short of a wrist sprain, that is.

And how does a good SP convince that there's no lingering knee tendon soreness? Only in the HJ will that come clear. The already conservative Eaton Shuffle is as easy as can be on the legs.
Jackaloupe
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:33 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby ptn » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:29 am

Nixon 14.12 PR
ptn
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 10:17 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:31 am

ptn wrote:Nixon 14.12 PR


Great put, an outdoor PR and beyond my projections, but below his indoor 14.27.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:31 am

He's a wonderful development, isn't he - so good to see someone exceeding expectations.
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:33 am

Anyone know what's up with Taiwo? No results, yet no fouls, showing.

And, yes, it is rather annoying to have the WR holder in the decathlon competing and only be able to see junior girls running the equivalent of a 5 minute mile.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby ptn » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:41 am

Jackaloupe wrote:"Last Put"? Hope that was sarcasm, as no way would Eaton/Marra pass up on this key "training" in the Weights. Short of a wrist sprain, that is.


So he passed anyway 3rd put.
ptn
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 10:17 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:43 am

Pretty disappointing SP, both in terms of results and in terms of ability to see anything on the webcast. Nixon continues to impress; Eaton's first put was great.

Projections after 3:
Nixon 8317
Taiwo 8056
Moss 7932
Horn 7867
Murphy 7820
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby TimRoy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:43 am

Updated projections, after a second successive event in which only Nixon significantly exceeded expectations:

Ashton Eaton 8946
Gunnar Nixon 8258
Jeremy Taiwo 7977
Gray Horn 7921
Miller Moss 7864
Jon Ryan Harlan 7771
Dakotah Keys 7759
Isaac Murphy 7721
Jake Arnold 7678
Austin Bahner 7602
TimRoy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:03 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:45 am

Nixon at his young age of 20 is the full package of talent:
size: 6'3"
speed 6.86s 60m
speedendurance 48.37s 400m
endurance 4:22 min 1500m
agility 13.81 junior hurdles
jump 2.17m high
strength: 14.27m shot
throws: 60.12 jav

Long jump, discus, high hurdles and pole vault will come and even in the 100 he'll improve.
On 1st view Nixon appears to be a bright guy. If he can stay healthy, focused and once he has grown into his frame, watch out!
Yes there is still Hardee and some other young talent in Jake Stein, J.Hock, K. Mayer and M.Uibo
But due to his rare comination of different talents I expect Nixon to be the top favorite on silver in Rio 2016.
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby ptn » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:47 am

Pappas 2.21 Sydney olympics, is there anyone else near that in this millenium?
ptn
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 10:17 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby DecFan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:53 am

ptn wrote:Pappas 2.21 Sydney olympics, is there anyone else near that in this millenium?

No one has jumped that high or higher since in a 7000+ pt decathlon. But note that Taiwo cleared 2.17 at NCAAs, and cleared 2.25 in a heptathlon this winter.
DecFan
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:00 am

Jagan Hames 2.30 born 1975 and Attila Zsivoczky 2.23 (1977) come in mind, need to check what they have been able to do in a decathlon this century
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

Re: USATF 2013 - mDec

Postby eiluke » Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:07 am

Both have peaked in high jump earlier (last century)
Zsivoczy 222 in a decathlon in the 90ies 218 in the 00s.
eiluke
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 pm

PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 9 guests