1500/Mile records for Cain [split]

[18.99s]

I think in just about every media circle, sports or otherwise, if you're under 18 you're called by your first name, which I'm fine with(but dont get me started on the NYRR printing WOMEN'S first names on bibs).

Do you know if it wasn't the women's own choice to have their first names on the bibs?

[Marlow]

Do you know if it wasn't the women's own choice to have their first names on the bibs?

??!!
If you are trying to market yourself, doesn't it make A LOT more sense for your bib to say, "Lolo" or "Alyson" than "Jones" or "Felix"? Murkans like their sports celebrities up close and personal . . . A-Rod, Peyton and Eli, Lance, etc..

[guru]

I think in just about every media circle, sports or otherwise, if you're under 18 you're called by your first name, which I'm fine with(but dont get me started on the NYRR printing WOMEN'S first names on bibs).

Do you know if it wasn't the women's own choice to have their first names on the bibs?

When this was first discussed here, David Monti stated it was indeed a NYRR decision.

[dj]

In all of this excitement it should be noted that Debbie Heald ran on a 11 lap track back in 1972. And also won her race.

Interesting point.

Is there any fairly-well accepted conversion from 11 laps to the mile tracks to 8 laps to the mile tracks for a mile race?

Did the NCAA look into that one?

Any educated guesses?

Verry rough: add 0.5 seconds per extra turn, in this case three seconds.

[huntinwr]

Hope Debbie Heald isn't feeling too bad about losing her record. From what I've read it was quite important to her.

[Jon]

Cain WANTS to run fast.....every time!!

In that case, the records (or 'bests') to look out for in Boston are...

3000m indoors
World junior - 8:33.56 (Tirunesh Dibaba)
American junior - 9:02.10 OT (Mary Cain) / 9:15.56 (Aisling Cuffe)
World youth - 9:02.10 OT (Mary Cain) / 9:02.42 (Etaferahu Tarekegne)
American youth - 9:02.10 OT (Mary Cain) / 9:35.15 (Aisling Cuffe)

2 miles indoors
World junior - 9:34.03 (Meseret Defar)
American junior - 9:55.71 (Lisa Welch-Brady)
World youth - 10:11.65 (Aisling Cuffe)
American youth - 10:11.65 (Aisling Cuffe)

[Dutra5]

3. The fact that so few Americans have run 8:45 (indoors....or even outdoors) has really nothing to do with Cain being able to do so. SHE isn't to blame for the lack of depth in female USA distance running!! (Though that's improving!!) Did you notice that there was NO ranking of 3K runners in the Annual issue of T&FN?? Not enough 3K races?? The 3K seems to be mainly an indoor event. Rarely run outdoors anymore!!

There have been enough women who've run 4:32 or a reasonable facsimile who have also run 3000m to draw a conclusion that it would be an outlier if she did so.

[Dutra5]

from hearing her interviews mary cain seems like whatever happens happens, it's not like a big name talent at the 2000 olympics where the pressure ws so intense she couldn't deal with it

if mary cain runs a 10:05 in bostom it'll be a whatever moment for her, a learning expereince

mary cain isn't taking this as serious as some, just enjoying it

enjoying being in the same race as t dibaba and enjoying what she can do

Let's hope so. At least one on the board seems to be a tad overly focused on the bottom line.

[AS]

Just (again) to be a tempering voice here:

Youth outdoor 1500m all-time list has 25 girls under 4.10 for 1500m, and Cain's current PR of 4.11.01 has her at #33

http://www.iaaf.org/records/toplists/mi ... men/youth/

And before the "but she was only 16" song kicks in, there are 13 gals 16 or younger ahead of here, including some who are not Chinese, Ethopian or Kenyan...

I'm not suggesting she can't/hasn't improved dramatically, but let's not pretend that her early success predicts future Olympic gold, nor that her being as fast as most US college milers says much more than the US has lacked depth in this event for a long time...

[doug5321]

just a sidenote in the boston indoor 2 mile cain will be racing another good young runner gotytom gebreselassie born january 1995

[az2004]

i see where cuffe has the usa records, she's a total strength runner can hammer at a hard pace

saw her do the 3k at penn, and get outkicked by hayley pierce, currently a frosh at georgetown

the gebreselassie presence interests me and seeing how the race progresses between the two interests me more than the dibaba presence

for me i see the cuffe marks going down

looking at cain performaces for 2013, i'd say 9:50 to 9:55 is possible

breaking 10 might be her target

[az2004]

the new articleon the frontpage has an interestingset of quotes

John Henwood: “I’ve worked with Mary since October. Alberto Salazar is her coach [the former marathon champion who also coaches Mo Farah] . He sets the programme, and I supervise the track sessions and report back to Alberto, who usually calls about five minutes after each session. The first time I saw her train I said to Alberto, ‘this girl is going to make the Olympic team’ and Alberto replied, ‘doh, that is a given’.”

“Mary also the attitude of an athlete in their late 20s, rather than a 16-year-old. She doesn’t get too concerned if she does not hit the times for every session. Some athletes would get really disappointed with themselves and would not be able to accept this. Mary listens to what Alberto and I say, and she is fine with any explanations we have [for not hitting the times] because she has great confidence in herself.”

the alberto doh that's a given shows his supreme confidence

[18.99s]

If you are trying to market yourself, doesn't it make A LOT more sense for your bib to say, "Lolo" or "Alyson" than "Jones" or "Felix"? Murkans like their sports celebrities up close and personal . . . A-Rod, Peyton and Eli, Lance, etc..

Depends on the specific first or last names. When referring to them by one name, people say Quarrie and Bolt and Montsho and Rudisha, but then they'll say Merlene and Carl and Asafa and Lolo. Some names just resonate better with the public.

But for bibs, they either should give each athlete the choice, or use last names for everybody if they aren't allowed to choose.

[unclezadok]

Just (again) to be a tempering voice here:

Youth outdoor 1500m all-time list has 25 girls under 4.10 for 1500m, and Cain's current PR of 4.11.01 has her at #33

http://www.iaaf.org/records/toplists/mi ... men/youth/

And before the "but she was only 16" song kicks in, there are 13 gals 16 or younger ahead of here, including some who are not Chinese, Ethopian or Kenyan...

I'm not suggesting she can't/hasn't improved dramatically, but let's not pretend that her early success predicts future Olympic gold, nor that her being as fast as most US college milers says much more than the US has lacked depth in this event for a long time...

OK fine, that's out of the way, can we get back to enjoying her performances now?

[26mi235]

Using first names on the bibs might make the degree of 'foreignness' less apparent in some cases. It is also an attempt to personalize the event.

[az2004]

megastars get the first name treatment

when you see usain, we know who we are talking about

if i see tyson i know who

[az2004]

should be noted boston meet will be on espn3
saturday 6-8eastern

6:04PM MBTA Women's 400m
6:12PM Boys' Junior Mile
6:22PM Women's 60m
6:32PM Men's 60m
6:35PM Women's Pole Vault
6:40PM NB Women's Mile
6:50PM Men's Mile
7:00PM Women's 60m Hurdles
7:13PM Powerade Men's 60m Hurdles
7:23PM Women's 800m
7:33PM Women's Two Mile
7:48PM NB Men's 3000m


and then on espn2 sunday from 2-4 eastern

and millrose 2/16 at 5pm on to7????

[Fortius19]

In all of this excitement it should be noted that Debbie Heald ran on a 11 lap track back in 1972. And also won her race.

Interesting point.

Is there any fairly-well accepted conversion from 11 laps to the mile tracks to 8 laps to the mile tracks for a mile race?

Did the NCAA look into that one?

Any educated guesses?

Verry rough: add 0.5 seconds per extra turn, in this case three seconds.

dj, thank you very much for that. I had no idea. Puts the comparison with 4:38 in a little bit more perspective (for me at least).

If she had broken the old record by less than one second, I'd still be looking for her to lower it more befor I considered it a "better performance".

[gh]

Of course, not all 160y tracks were remotely the same. For those adept at handling its steep walls, I'd say that the San Diego track, for example, was 2-3 seconds faster for a mile than was the MSG installation.

Size was only part of the equation.

[az2004]

solid point from gh, i just got done reading runner world article on heald

http://www.runnersworld.com/runners-sto ... ant-record

talks of her doing 10-12 miles per day

[Conor Dary]

Of course, not all 160y tracks were remotely the same. For those adept at handling its steep walls, I'd say that the San Diego track, for example, was 2-3 seconds faster for a mile than was the MSG installation.

Size was only part of the equation.

Curious, then, how fast the Chicago Stadium track was for Tom O'Hara's 3:56.4 in 1964? He ran 3:56.6 the month before in NYC.

[Helen S]

Regarding the Chicago track in 1964, I am assuming this was the same one I ran on in 1966 or 67- which was a hard dirt flat track with a wooden rail and smelled like a barn. Pretty fast though, as I recall.

[Conor Dary]

Regarding the Chicago track in 1964, I am assuming this was the same one I ran on in 1966 or 67- which was a hard dirt flat track with a wooden rail and smelled like a barn. Pretty fast though, as I recall.

You are talking about the University of Chicago's 220 dirt track, down on 59th St. or so. I ran on it many times. Dust everywhere. I did an indoor steeplechase on it. It was fairly fast track, I remember Wohlhuter running 4:07 or so on it, around 1970. It has since been remodeled to a mondo surface.

O'Hara's race was in the Chicago Daily News meet, held at the Chicago Stadium on West Madison, where Michael Jordan played, on an 11 lap track. The video is on youtube.

[kuha]

Regarding the Chicago track in 1964, I am assuming this was the same one I ran on in 1966 or 67- which was a hard dirt flat track with a wooden rail and smelled like a barn. Pretty fast though, as I recall.

You are talking about the University of Chicago's 220 dirt track, down on 59th St. or so. I ran on it many times. Dust everywhere. I did an indoor steeplechase on it. It was fairly fast track, I remember Wohlhuter running 4:07 or so on it, around 1970. It has since been remodeled to a mondo surface.

O'Hara's race was in the Chicago Daily News meet, held at the Chicago Stadium on West Madison, where Michael Jordan played, on an 11 lap track. The video is on youtube.

Here's the youtube link, posted by the Loyola Athletics site:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vILN1xjV-rI

The track actually looked pretty decent for the period--11 laps, wood, with relatively tight corners and long straights. No matter how you cut it, however, 3:56 back then, on that surface, was pretty amazing.

[Conor Dary]

So is this the WR for an 11 lap track?

3.50.6 Eamon Coghlan IRL San Diego Feb 20, 1981

[gh]

yes, with Steve Scott running 3:51.8 behind him for the No. 2 on such an installation.

[mcgato]

Cain finished 3rd in 9:38.68 at the NB Boston indoor meet. That obliterated the indoor and outdoor HS 2 mile record. Is there any way she is not HS athlete of the year, simply based off of her indoor performances?

[Brian]

Size was only part of the equation.

So you're saying size matters--?
;]

.

[az2004]

cain might well be usa indoor female of the year

[26mi235]

Cain finished 3rd in 9:38.68 at the NB Boston indoor meet. That obliterated the indoor and outdoor HS 2 mile record. Is there any way she is not HS athlete of the year, simply based off of her indoor performances?

Last year she was competing with high school girls who finished fourth at the Olympic Trials. Cain is good, but there is an unrealistic nature to this whole thing which seems to be claiming she is world class. At her age, both Decker and Heald were world class, and they were beating some of the best in the entire world.

[aaronk]

Cain finished 3rd in 9:38.68 at the NB Boston indoor meet. That obliterated the indoor and outdoor HS 2 mile record. Is there any way she is not HS athlete of the year, simply based off of her indoor performances?

Last year she was competing with high school girls who finished fourth at the Olympic Trials. Cain is good, but there is an unrealistic nature to this whole thing which seems to be claiming she is world class. At her age, both Decker and Heald were world class, and they were beating some of the best in the entire world.

One thing (among many, I'm sure!) has changed since the 70's and 80's in women's (and men's!!) track, whether indoor or outdoor!

In just 3 words......

The African Revolution!!

There is no way you can compare what happened in the 70's and 80's with where things are today!!

[Dutra5]

i think 8:55 is rrealistic next week for 3k

Yeah....I tend to agree with this moreso than an 8:45. There are much faster US women over the mile/1500m who have only barely gotten to the 8:45 mark.

Right on. Her run today converts to 8:55+

[aaronk]

i think 8:55 is rrealistic next week for 3k

Yeah....I tend to agree with this moreso than an 8:45. There are much faster US women over the mile/1500m who have only barely gotten to the 8:45 mark.

Right on. Her run today converts to 8:55+

I know this is meat for another grinder....so to speak ( )....but I HATE conversions...whether they're for Cain or anyone else, male or female!

Conversions are ESTIMATES...GUESSES!!

They may be learned estimates.
Scholarly estimates.
Estimates by renowned experts.
But they are still just ESTIMATES....GUESSES!!!

Tonight, Mary Cain was OFFICIALLY timed at the 3000 meter mark, enroute to her two mile.
She ran 9:07.53 there.
There is NO NEED to estimate her time!!
Or convert her time!!

While I firmly believe she COULD have run 3K in 8:55 tonight (actually, much faster!!), she did NOT!!

[Dutra5]

i think 8:55 is rrealistic next week for 3k

Yeah....I tend to agree with this moreso than an 8:45. There are much faster US women over the mile/1500m who have only barely gotten to the 8:45 mark.

Right on. Her run today converts to 8:55+

I know this is meat for another grinder....so to speak ( )....but I HATE conversions...whether they're for Cain or anyone else, male or female!

Conversions are ESTIMATES...GUESSES!!

Exactly and a good estimate is that she would have likely run something around 8:55....maybe 8:56, maybe 8:54 or maybe 8:53. But, within the context that the quote was taken from, it is extremely unlikely she would have run 8:45 which is what someone said they thought she could or would run.

So...see that...we agree. An estimate.

[guru]

Tonight, Mary Cain was OFFICIALLY timed at the 3000 meter mark, enroute to her two mile. She ran 9:07.53 there.

9:04.51