Return to Current Events

A New Low for Sports Illustrated

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: A New Low for Sports Illustrated

Postby berkeley » Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:28 pm

On a somewhat heartening and slightly related note, I was in a doctor's office the other day and saw the two most recent copies of T&FN among the other magazines. OK, full disclosure - he was a podiatrist specializing in runners' injuries. Still, I expected to see Runner's World but not our Bible.
berkeley
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: A New Low for Sports Illustrated

Postby G.Ahearn » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:29 pm

. . . .And we are not too surprised to see the SFH story as a Sports Illustrated "top story" today, are we?
G.Ahearn
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: A New Low for Sports Illustrated

Postby Marlow » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:35 pm

berkeley wrote:On a somewhat heartening and slightly related note, I was in a doctor's office the other day and saw the two most recent copies of T&FN among the other magazines.

Was browsing my local Books-a-Million today, and there, half hidden behind the Running World copies, were 6 pristine January 2013 Track & Field News issues!! I pulled them out and put them prominently in the front of the rack. :D
Marlow
 
Posts: 18742
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: A New Low for Sports Illustrated

Postby Daisy » Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:58 pm

I was at Barnes and Noble and found TFN for the first time. They were stuffed at the back of the rack. Obviously I pulled them out and put them in the front :)
Daisy
 
Posts: 12728
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am


Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andres9, booond, Bruce Kritzler, bushop, Cooter Brown, Exabot [Bot], GDAWG, gktrack, Google [Bot], jazzcyclist, JRM, mcgato, tm71 and 14 guests