Return to the Mile?


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby TN1965 » Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:56 pm

Joe Sixpack probably cannot tell the difference between a mile and 1500m (or 1600m for that matter.) So it really does not matter to them which distance is run. They may think it's funny that runners are starting 9m before the finish line or 100m ahead of the finish line. But once the race starts that all becomes irrelevant to them. It's all about "Us vs. Them" whether it's countries, schools or whatever.
TN1965
 
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:38 pm

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby Dutra5 » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:58 pm

I don't think the switch to 100m from 100yds had the same effect because of the time element. For instance...today...a guy who runs under 10 secs most people know is pretty good. Same with the women and 11 secs.

In the mile...there is the 4 min barrier whether it's relevent to elite status or not. It still is something that matters to a more casual fan.
Dutra5
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:51 am

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby Daisy » Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:04 pm

Marlow wrote:Do we really want it to become a Monster Truck Rally?

They're fun, right? On the other hand, so is lawn mower racing, especially if you know the people driving. Part of track and fields problem is that most of the athletes are completely anonymous.
Daisy
 
Posts: 13153
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby aaronk » Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:10 pm

Dutra5 wrote:I don't think the switch to 100m from 100yds had the same effect because of the time element. For instance...today...a guy who runs under 10 secs most people know is pretty good. Same with the women and 11 secs.

In the mile...there is the 4 min barrier whether it's relevent to elite status or not. It still is something that matters to a more casual fan.


So do many other "English" barriers.

7 foot HJ
200 foot DT
70 foot SP
27 foot LJ
13.00 110H
sub-50.0 400H
etc, etc

Not world beaters or records, but still psychological barriers that, once surpassed, gives one a taste of being an elite athlete and an Olympic prospect.

So the sub-4 mile ain't a record breaker, but it does provide the athlete a rung on the ladder where he/she can envision medals and victories.

Let's keep it.
What harm does it do??
aaronk
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:39 am

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby tandfman » Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:59 am

TN1965 wrote:Joe Sixpack probably cannot tell the difference between a mile and 1500m (or 1600m for that matter.)

Joe Sixpack knows how long a mile is, but has no idea at all how long either 1500 or 1600 meters is. That matters.
Last edited by tandfman on Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
tandfman
 
Posts: 15043
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby TN1965 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:54 am

aaronk wrote:...So do many other "English" barriers.
13.00 110H
sub-50.0 400H


These two are metric records.

aaronk wrote:So the sub-4 mile ain't a record breaker, but it does provide the athlete a rung on the ladder where he/she can envision medals and victories.


I don't think we will see a 4-minute mile by a woman within my lifetime. On the other hand, any woman who runs a 4-miunute 1500m is an excellent candidate for an Olympic / World medalist.
TN1965
 
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:38 pm

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby BBTM media » Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:31 am

aaronk wrote:So the sub-4 mile ain't a record breaker, but it does provide the athlete a rung on the ladder where he/she can envision medals and victories.

Let's keep it.
What harm does it do??


Yes, and that sub-4 minute Mile will also likely be covered by the athlete's local media unlike a comparable 3:42 for 1500 meters.

In short, the Mile has media value and interest.

Go Mile!
BBTM media
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:23 am

Re: Return to the Mile?

Postby Marlow » Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:56 am

This headline from The Atlantic (linked on front page) HAS to get a TAFNY nom for Most Bombastically Wrong-headed of the Year:

The Unsung Glory of the Mile Run

The MIle receives the MOST-SUNG GLORY of any track event with the possible exception of the most basic event there is, the 100.
Marlow
 
Posts: 21126
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Small crowd in NW USATF Championship Re: Return to the M

Postby GHM » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:19 pm

kuha wrote:It's bad to be cursed with historical memory. The fans that went to the big meets (indoors and outdoors) in the 1950s and '60s were very definitely "general" fans--NOT strictly t&f-specific fans. THAT's the group (and the majority) that's been lost--both to the other sports and because they came to feel alienated by t&f.
Thank you!

No one care about T&F anymore. ESPN and TV in general with 90% football background announcers care less if someone runs 3:20 for 15 or 3:40 for mile.

Stop bitching! Attend a local youth (middle or high school) meet. Go to a college meet and take your family with you. Call local sport radio and ask them to mention the location and time of meets not results for god sake. Our local trash newspaper has stopped publishing HS results and local meets for the past ten years. I know that 2nd string corner back in our HS football team has a cold though.
GHM
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: Small crowd in NW USATF Championship Re: Return to t

Postby Marlow » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:53 pm

GHM wrote:Our local trash newspaper has stopped publishing HS results and local meets for the past ten years.

When ours did, I said THANK THE LORD! They almost always effed it up anyway, because they had no idea what a realistic result was. Back in the 80s and 90s, the Florida papers would routinely report ridiculously stupendous marks, which everyone would then believe - never to be replicated.
Marlow
 
Posts: 21126
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere over the . . . hill

Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], scottmitchell74 and 5 guests