wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby 26mi235 » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:31 pm

[quote="aaronk"
To me, it's not much different than the Oscar's, the Emmy's, the Grammy's, the National Book Award's, even the Nobel's!!

They're all either totally political, or they play to sentimental favorites, or they lean to who's more currently popular!!
[/quote]

A lot of that politics over quality in those Nobel Prizes (you might leave aside the Peace, as it is done in a different manner).
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby ATK » Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:00 pm

j-a-m wrote:The events in which SAFP, Felix, Ennis compete have tougher competition and/or are a better measure of athletic ability than the events in which Adams, Perkovic compete. That's why SAFP, Felix, Ennis should be ahead of those others.

If thats the case then the top heptathlete should be the AOY every year....

If someone like Adams dominates her event, regardless if event is not as good of a measure of complete athleticism as Ennis, or no one was throwing as far as in the past, if she was able to be above and beyond the competition THIS YEAR, then she is deserving.
ATK
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby t_monk » Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:26 pm

ATK wrote:
j-a-m wrote:The events in which SAFP, Felix, Ennis compete have tougher competition and/or are a better measure of athletic ability than the events in which Adams, Perkovic compete. That's why SAFP, Felix, Ennis should be ahead of those others.

If thats the case then the top heptathlete should be the AOY every year....

If someone like Adams dominates her event, regardless if event is not as good of a measure of complete athleticism as Ennis, or no one was throwing as far as in the past, if she was able to be above and beyond the competition THIS YEAR, then she is deserving.


Co-Sign!
t_monk
 
Posts: 4329
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:03 pm
Location: New Haven, CT + Kgn, JA

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby Tuariki » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:44 am

j-a-m wrote:The events in which SAFP, Felix, Ennis compete have tougher competition and/or are a better measure of athletic ability than the events in which Adams, Perkovic compete. That's why SAFP, Felix, Ennis should be ahead of those others.


What a a load of total tripe. Speed is not the only measure of athletic ability (SAFP and Felix).

And while Ennis is an awesome athlete and an awesome looking athlete, she is, as with nearly all multi-eventers, not able to cut it in an individual event - although she may prove me wrong in the 100H if she focuses on that event alone. I find it difficult to rate as AOY an athlete who can only throw the javelin 47.49 when the WR is just a little bit further.

By j-a-m's moronic logic then the AOY would have to be awarded to the best marathoner every year, given there are a hell of a lot more people running marathons than the 100m or 200m or any other event.

Also by j-a-m's stupid logic then perhaps Bolt shouldn't be AOY because when he is on song and not injured he does not have any competition either. How pathetic that because an athlete completely dominates her event (a la Adams and Perkovic) that some idiot thinks this devalues their performances.
Tuariki
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:39 pm
Location: Rohe o Te Whanau a Apanui

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby 26mi235 » Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:18 pm

When the rewards are greatest in an area that they draw the greatest competition. It happens everywhere and always. Why the implications of this are so indigestible to some is always a surprise, but it often leads to them drawing the wrong conclusions (or at least failing to draw the sometimes obvious ones).
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby bushop » Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:49 pm

The IAAF decision makes me more curious as to who will win Track & Field News' wAOY award.

Your thoughts?
bushop
 
Posts: 1866
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: near the toys and tape measures

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby gh » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:47 am

Tuariki wrote:....
By j-a-m's moronic logic.... Also by j-a-m's stupid logic...



Do come back and play with us in a while when you learn to be a tad more civil with your fellow posters.
gh
 
Posts: 46321
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby bushop » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:29 am

j-a-m wrote:The events in which SAFP, Felix, Ennis compete... are a better measure of athletic ability than the events in which Adams, Perkovic compete. That's why SAFP, Felix... should be ahead of those others.

What is your measure?

I've know many flat sprinters who struggled to kick a ball or catch a frisbee = no coordination.
All world class throwers have high-end kinesthetic (athletic) sense... they have to if they want to produce effective technique.
bushop
 
Posts: 1866
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: near the toys and tape measures

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby 26mi235 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:32 pm

bushop wrote:
j-a-m wrote:The events in which SAFP, Felix, Ennis compete... are a better measure of athletic ability than the events in which Adams, Perkovic compete. That's why SAFP, Felix... should be ahead of those others.

What is your measure?

I've know many flat sprinters who struggled to kick a ball or catch a frisbee = no coordination.
All world class throwers have high-end kinesthetic (athletic) sense... they have to if they want to produce effective technique.


You are missing the point. The 100 and similar sprints are the glamor events with the greatest remuneration. Thus, they get more people pushing harder for those events. Do you think that there are only one or two people in the US capable for walking under 4 hours for the 50km? There are not enough willing to work at it given that the rewards are rather modest. Events with lower earnings potential draw less interest and hence less competition.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby j-a-m » Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:49 pm

ATK wrote:If thats the case then the top heptathlete should be the AOY every year....

There are many different events in t&f, so you need some sort of criteria to compare those events when you vote for something like athlete of the year; those criteria can either be explicit or implicit.

As part of those criteria I don't think it's useful how much an athlete dominated their event within a given year; that could just be for a lack of competition. The following three criteria, on the other hand, I do consider useful in comparing different events:

- performances compared to all time bests;
- level of worldwide competition in that event;
- overall athletic ability.

With respect to overall athletic ability, multi eventers will look good every year, sure, but it's only one of many criteria. What Ennis did in London compares favorably to all-time bests in the event; that's not the case for multi eventers every year.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2449
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby Gabriella » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:40 am

When I look at AOY I look at the following:

Win/loss record against competitors
Times/distances/marks (their top mark but also marks across the whole season)
Medals won (I don't consider relays)
Margin of victory
Historical perspective (is it a new event? Past seasons of athletes in the same event etc)
and then, to a lesser extent, how competitive that event is compared to other AOY nominations.

And my winners are as follows (with analysis to follow in next post)

Win/loss record - Adams
Times/distances/marks - Ennis
Medals won - SAFP
Margin of victory - Ennis
Historical perspective - Ennis
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby Gabriella » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:43 am

Felix does well in the "time/distance/mark" in terms of her best mark (historically) as she ran the 6th fastest time ever and goes 4th on the all-time list. But SAFP equals her here with 7th fastest/4th on list and Ennis is there too with 12th best mark/5th on list. Looking at their full set of marks, it's more hazy; SAFP's next best mark is 19th on the all-time list, while Felix's is 46th. Ennis's next best is 18th. Looking at the whole season, Felix's races over 200m are a handful, so it's hard to compare her 200 season agaisnt SAFP's 100m season, where the latter ran more and had more opportunity to run faster...but also lose.
Unfortunately, due to whatever reason, Adams and Perkovic's bests are much lower in the all-time lists so they lose out here.
Win/Loss record, Felix, Ennis and Adams do very well. Perkovic too. SAFP not so well.
Medals won, SAFP wins with gold and silver. Her most direct comparison is Felix who also has two events. However, event specialists Adams, Ennis and Perkovic dont have the opportunity. But either way, SAFP has the nod in medals won.
Margin of victory is where it's a bit easier to compare. Ennis wins here easily with her massive 306 pt winning margin, then possibly Perkovic with her 2m margin over Felix, then Adams and SAFP in that order.
Historically, for me, Ennis wins as the first woman to go over 6900 twice in one season since 1988. Felix is second as the first woman to go sub 21.7 since 1998.

And I’ve done all that and forgotten Sally Pearson , Anna Chicherova and Spotakova
:? :(
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby j-a-m » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:42 am

26mi235 wrote:The 100 and similar sprints are the glamor events with the greatest remuneration. Thus, they get more people pushing harder for those events.

That's correct. An additional aspect is that the sprints are easier to train for in developing countries than some other events, because you don't need that much equipment.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2449
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby j-a-m » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:46 am

Gabriella wrote:Felix does well in the "time/distance/mark" in terms of her best mark (historically) as she ran the 6th fastest time ever and goes 4th on the all-time list. But SAFP equals her here with 7th fastest/4th on list and Ennis is there too with 12th best mark/5th on list. Looking at their full set of marks, it's more hazy; SAFP's next best mark is 19th on the all-time list, while Felix's is 46th. Ennis's next best is 18th. Looking at the whole season, Felix's races over 200m are a handful, so it's hard to compare her 200 season agaisnt SAFP's 100m season, where the latter ran more and had more opportunity to run faster...but also lose.
Unfortunately, due to whatever reason, Adams and Perkovic's bests are much lower in the all-time lists so they lose out here.

Exactly; somehow those guys arguing for Adams or Perkovic seem to forget that.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2449
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby gh » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:03 am

No, the people pushing for Adams and Perković have a firmer sense of reality and what the true value of all-time lists is. It's obviously not remotely the same in all events.
gh
 
Posts: 46321
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby 26mi235 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:57 am

I think we tend to understand the perspective to take with respect to shot put marks from history. The only one to stay with her in this era has been shown to have had at least some of them assisted in a manner that likely applies to some(!) of those historical marks.

AF's marks were so good that people were apparently disappointed by her 21.x winning time over one of the best fields in the Games (at least T&F). As for Ennis topping the marks list -- I think she did well, but please, she need several hundred points to get to the front end of history; certainly a bit of a stretch, in my mind, to equate to better than multiple 21s (however, I grant that Gabriela has a broader and deeper grasp of the competitive landscape and I can be convinced to change my assessment; gh has changed mine plenty of times and Gabriela several).

I suppose that they way I look at it, this year, for both men and women, the difficulty in picking the top of the AOY listing is a measure of how good the year was. There are a LOT of deserving athletes out there and some good ones will not even make the top 10.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby bushop » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:33 pm

j-a-m wrote:- performances compared to all time bests;
- level of worldwide competition in that event;
- overall athletic ability.

Are these listed in order of importance?
bushop
 
Posts: 1866
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: near the toys and tape measures

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby j-a-m » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:37 pm

bushop wrote:
j-a-m wrote:- performances compared to all time bests;
- level of worldwide competition in that event;
- overall athletic ability.

Are these listed in order of importance?

No; that's in random oder.
j-a-m
 
Posts: 2449
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:11 pm

Allyson's 200m time was probably the individual performance of the year but that and the OG are not enough to rank particularly highly for me. It seemed to me that she did as little as possible over her premier event this year and nothing else she has done burnished her achievements, so she'll get severely marked down by me
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby TrackFan4Ever » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:22 pm

Would you have given her the award if she only ran 200s in 2012?
TrackFan4Ever
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:38 am

TrackFan4Ever wrote:Would you have given her the award if she only ran 200s in 2012?


No, because she only can it 4 times, this may be acceptable in multi events but not in individual ones if you want to be AOY, especially as the Zagreb race was totally pointless. She didn't run 1 200m in a European DL :shock:

I'd rather you ran against everyone, every week and lost a couple of times (Aries), than ran sparingly and stayed undefeated.
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perkovic

Postby Gabriella » Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:40 am

26mi235 wrote:AF's marks were so good that people were apparently disappointed by her 21.x winning time over one of the best fields in the Games (at least T&F). As for Ennis topping the marks list -- I think she did well, but please, she need several hundred points to get to the front end of history; certainly a bit of a stretch, in my mind, to equate to better than multiple 21s (however, I grant that Gabriela has a broader and deeper grasp of the competitive landscape and I can be convinced to change my assessment; gh has changed mine plenty of times and Gabriela several).


I don't think Felix was any closer to 21.34 than Ennis was to 7291. I also don't think two sub 21's counts as 'multiple 21s'. IMO Ennis's 2 x 6900+ counts for far more than Felix's 2 x sub 22.

If we look at the last 20 years, there have only been two women to score 6900 pts or above; Shouaa once in 1996 and then Kluft once in 03, 04 and 07. Neither could make it twice over 6900 in the same season. JJK's 1988 season was the last time we have seen a woman score over 6900 twice in one season.

On the other hand, look at the 200m over the last 20 years, and we see many more women running 22.00 secs or under; Ottey, Torrance, Privalova, Jones, Miller, VCB, Felix herself, Stewart & Simpson.

You could argue the sprints are more competitive, the events are more developed than the heptathlon and I don't disagree. But equally everything and anything can go wrong in a heptathlon and the chance of hitting every event is a rare occurance. We've also seen that, overall, the best all round women do do the heptatlon, so it's not like we are 'missing' women to other events. Historically the event may have gained had Devers, Drechsler and Privalova focussed on the multis, but it does seem that whoever was good at multis generally does do it. So the event has what partcipants it can have. You are of course always going to have less women in the heptathlon because few women have the ability across 7 events; its not just about facilities.

Some other points: Felix also 'benefits' from the fact that she is really the only true elite 200m specialist out there right now. The other top women sprinters tend to concentrate more on either the 100 or 400 but there is no reason any of these women couldnt be great at 200m should they focus on it the way Felix does: Jeter, Simpson, Stewart, VCB, Richards. Back in the 90s and Ottey, Torrance and Privalova all paid equal attention to both sprints. It just doesnt happen now (not Felix's fault but it's a factor)

Of course, comparing arbitrary marks in different events can be meaningless, and as a sport we set benchmarks in each event that dont correlate to anotehr event. But we do have the benefit of history and hindsight.
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby TrackFan4Ever » Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:28 am

mump boy wrote:
TrackFan4Ever wrote:Would you have given her the award if she only ran 200s in 2012?


No, because she only can it 4 times, this may be acceptable in multi events but not in individual ones if you want to be AOY, especially as the Zagreb race was totally pointless. She didn't run 1 200m in a European DL :shock:

I'd rather you ran against everyone, every week and lost a couple of times (Aries), than ran sparingly and stayed undefeated.


I guess I should have made my question clearer for you. If she had only run 200s (obviously more than 4) and went undefeated, would you have given her the award?
TrackFan4Ever
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:40 am

TrackFan4Ever wrote:
mump boy wrote:
TrackFan4Ever wrote:Would you have given her the award if she only ran 200s in 2012?


No, because she only can it 4 times, this may be acceptable in multi events but not in individual ones if you want to be AOY, especially as the Zagreb race was totally pointless. She didn't run 1 200m in a European DL :shock:

I'd rather you ran against everyone, every week and lost a couple of times (Aries), than ran sparingly and stayed undefeated.


I guess I should have made my question clearer for you. If she had only run 200s (obviously more than 4) and went undefeated, would you have given her the award?


It has nothing to do with what other events she ran, she just didn't run enough 200m and what she did in other events doesn't add enough to her accomplishments to compensate.

I really like Allyson but she just hasn't done enough this year to be considered AOY, i honestly can't believe anyone else thinks she has :shock: :?
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby TrackFan4Ever » Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:07 pm

I will leave this alone. It was a very basic question that did not ask about any other events or if you liked her or not. I simply asked if she had run more 200s and went undefeated would you have given her the AOY?

I guess Felix needed to run more 200s to convince you that she is better than the DL champ Charonda Williams. That would have proved a whole lot. :D

I think we all know what Felix's body of work would have been if she had taken the easy route of just focusing on the 200. Evidently, you need concrete proof that such would be the case. Others were persuaded by what she did at the OT and the Olympics.

If athletes in the past can win AOY without winning gold in their main event at the Olympics or WCs, I am comfortable with Felix winning based upon what she did in OT and Olympics. Put me in that group that understands why she won! :wink:
TrackFan4Ever
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby Flumpy » Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:51 pm

We all understand why she won and it had nothing to do with what she did on the track.
Flumpy
 
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:54 pm

TrackFan4Ever wrote:I will leave this alone. It was a very basic question that did not ask about any other events or if you liked her or not. I simply asked if she had run more 200s and went undefeated would you have given her the AOY?


The premise of your question is that whatever she had done i wouldn't vote for her as AOY. I wouldn't care if she 'only' ran 200m or not, she just needed to run more 200m at the same level (or preferably better)

If we're awarding AOY for 4 races why is no one talking about Cakir with her flawless 3 race season, Tirunesh with her 10k victories and additional 5k victory in NY and London medal or Tika Gelana with her London victory and Rotterdam 5th on all time list ?

Because some people are being swayed by her relay medals, nationality and PR abilities.

She's very lucky there are so few female candidates this year or she's be WAY down my list
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby TrackFan4Ever » Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:25 pm

Yep, Felix's selection had nothing to do with with what she did on the track. Utter stupidity!
TrackFan4Ever
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:22 am

Flumpy wrote:We all understand why she won and it had nothing to do with what she did on the track.


This has to be the stupidest thing that you wrote in this exchange. If it nothing to do with her winning the award she would have won it if she had failed to make the Finals in any of her events and ran a 58 and took US out of the medals.

Clearly, her performances were a major part of her winning the award. They were assessed by someone with different criteria (e.g., the 4x400 counted a bunch) and who may well have had some of the preferences you imply. However, "...nothing to do with what she did on the track." is such a vehement expression of your position as to make your comment mean less than it should. [Remember, I think she should only be somewhere around 4 and it might be further down than that if I worked it through.]
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby Gabriella » Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:26 am

TrackFan4Ever & 26mi235 come on, we know Flumpy didn't mean it literally, he was just making a point.

The problem with comparing track events to field and multievents, is that when there is a great track performance it's right there in our faces, it has impact, boom! Other events don't have the benefit of this. Felix's 21.69 was a superb performance, run under the pressure of the 100m selection hoo-ha. It was hyped up and she faced that pressure and ran one of the fastest times ever. Her Olympic gold was perhaps slightly less impressive, because SAFP was perhaps closer than expected and because we were probably expecting faster.

But Ennis competes in an event that doesn't have the same obvious impact. You have to understand the event and scoring system (to some degree) you have to follow her over two days worth of events, understanding how she fares against her rivals when not directly competing against them. It is far easier for the casual fan to appreciate Felix's run/s. But this isnt Ennis's fault and when selecting AOY it shouldnt matter.

The same goes for the field eventers. Most TV stations don't show more than 5 or 6 throws from teh whole final, and in the apst some have only shown the three medal winning throws. How can these throwers compete with the likes of the sprinters? Occsaionally we do get to see more of the competition, but as with the multis you have to invest a bit more in watching these events unfold.

Unfortunately it seems the IAAF just wants to appease the casual fan.
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby Gabriella » Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:52 am

Putting their performances into an Olympic context, let us also not forget that in her opening event, the 100mh, Ennis ran a time that would have won gold in every Olympics since the 100mh was introduced bar 04 and 88, where she would have won bronze and silver respectively. That is an amazing achievement for a multi eventer. On her overall score, only JJK's 88 and 92 Olympic wins are higher.

On the other hand, Felix's time wouldn't have won gold in 08, 88, 84 or 00, (the latter depending on how you see that race in hindsight.)

This is another plus to Ennis IMO.
Gabriella
 
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:59 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:28 am

The women's field is so weak this year i may be coming round to Jess but at the moment it's still Val. As for POY i can only think of about 3 worthy ones :? :(
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:18 pm

Gabriella wrote:TrackFan4Ever & 26mi235 come on, we know Flumpy didn't mean it literally, he was just making a point.


He did not mean it literally, but he meant to be demeaning in saying it, and as such he should watch what he says. Hyperbole on the positive sign is hyperbole; on the negative side it is hard not to have a nasty edge to it.

If he is mad, he should to be mad at the IAAF; if he points it at AF it is simply unacceptable.

As for the T&FN selectors, there may be some biases but they tend to even out, although the field events are probably under-rated a bit. That is why the T&FN rankings are the currency of contracts etc.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby Flumpy » Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:59 pm

26mi235 wrote:If he is mad, he should to be mad at the IAAF; if he points it at AF it is simply unacceptable.


But it wasn't at Allyson so I have no idea what you are on about. Allyson Felix is great. A lovely lady, a real talent and complete class act. I couldn't have been happier that she finally won her Olympic Gold medal. I have absolutely no problem with her at all. It's the IAAF's ridiculous decision that I take issue with.

I don't know why you're so touchy on the subject. No one has a bad word to say about Allyson but clearly her season did not warrant AOY consideration from any objective voter and it doesn't make me 'nasty' or 'demeaning' to point that out.
Flumpy
 
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:00 pm

It's a given the AF overall season wasn't better than Jess or Val but

Jen Suhr competed 14 times this year and won 12, the other 2 were NH she won OG Gold and jumped the 2nd best ever indoors (Only 2 other have ever gone higher outdoors)

Sally Pearson won 8/9 and ran 12.35 !! a time only 4 other people have ever run and that hasn't been run since 2000 except by Sally last year

Yelena Lashmanova set a WR at the OG in the 20k walk (what was i doing when this happened because i have no recollection at all)

Sandra Perkovic won 13/14 contest including European and Olympic champs

and how anyone can think Allyson's season was better than these is beyond me !!
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby t_monk » Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:40 pm

mump boy wrote:It's a given the AF overall season wasn't better than Jess or Val but

Jen Suhr competed 14 times this year and won 12, the other 2 were NH she won OG Gold and jumped the 2nd best ever indoors (Only 2 other have ever gone higher outdoors)

Sally Pearson won 8/9 and ran 12.35 !! a time only 4 other people have ever run and that hasn't been run since 2000 except by Sally last year

Yelena Lashmanova set a WR at the OG in the 20k walk (what was i doing when this happened because i have no recollection at all)

Sandra Perkovic won 13/14 contest including European and Olympic champs

and how anyone can think Allyson's season was better than these is beyond me !!


I don't think she should have even gotten in the top 3 much less win the whole thing.
t_monk
 
Posts: 4329
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:03 pm
Location: New Haven, CT + Kgn, JA

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:33 pm

Undefeated at her event [I might have missed this a loss, sorry for that failing], did well in other events, including a relay leg that counts for IAAF (apparently - you can quibble about the criteria, but if that is included as counting, then it counts) and did very credibly outside her primary event. The relatively small number of competitions are a result of competing in other events, but she ran six 200s just in the OT/OG duo, so it is not that little, and she looked dominant in those preliminary rounds -- she was dusting everyone in terms of the apparent performance level.

Yes, I do not have her at the top, but to say that she deserves no consideration is to go in the face of even the title of this thread started by someone that is not a primary Felix fan (Tuariki). Again, extreme statement that she does not belong in consideration is absurd. And voicing such an extreme position makes me think that the writer does not have as valuable of an opinion as if they did not write such silliness. That she won the IAAF variant certainly is consistent with the position that she at least belongs in the conversation.
26mi235
 
Posts: 16317
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:09 am

IAAF PR fest is over so i'm now speaking about T&FN where thankfully relays and heats !! should not be taken into consideration
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby eldanielfire » Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:40 pm

mump boy wrote:IAAF PR fest is over so i'm now speaking about T&FN where thankfully relays and heats !! should not be taken into consideration


Why shouldn't relays and heats be considered?
eldanielfire
 
Posts: 1318
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:07 am

Re: wAOY - Felix, SRR, Adams, Perković

Postby mump boy » Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:16 pm

eldanielfire wrote:
mump boy wrote:IAAF PR fest is over so i'm now speaking about T&FN where thankfully relays and heats !! should not be taken into consideration


Why shouldn't relays and heats be considered?


because T&FN rules say relays aren't and of course heats aren't !!

I'm very sure of my top 5 after that it becomes a free for all, there are 2 i've knocked out who could easily be my 6-7 !! :?
mump boy
 
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: saaaaaarf london

PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Dave, DCSIGMA, Google [Bot], nztrackfan and 11 guests