Return to Current Events

OG Winning Marks?

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

OG Winning Marks?

Postby Marlow » Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:59 am

I predict

Men

100 9.72
200 19.44
400 44.30
800 1:41.5
1500 3:31.3
3St 8:00
5 12:54
10 26:50
110H 12.95
400H 47.77
Mar 2:05
20W WK
50W WK
4x1 37.00
4x4 2:57.5
HJ 2.37
PV 5.90
LJ 8.35
TJ 17.80
SP 22.00
DT 68.50
HT 81.00
JT 87.50
Dec 9000

Women

100 10.80
200 21.85
400 49.20
800 1:57
1500 4:00
3St 9:11
5 14:40
10 30:00
100H 12.43
400H 52.80
Mar 2:20
20W WK
4x1 41.52
4x4 3:18.20
HJ 2.05
PV 4.85
LJ 7.10
TJ 14.88
SP 21.00
DT 68.00
HT 78.00
JT 67.50
Hep 7000!
Marlow
 
Posts: 18841
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby aaronk » Sat Jul 28, 2012 12:22 pm

First thing that came to mind was YOUR response to MY predictions for Trials winning marks!!
You wrote:
"I am....skeptical....of the marks you posted."

In EVERY distance (or mid-distance) event, men and women, you predicted SLOWER times for the Trials than me.
Most of our other predictions were dissimilar too, but I'll focus here on the 800-10K.

Why were you "skeptical" of MY predicted times.....if YOURS are way faster than what "normally' happens in these races??

Meaning, that you and others have said that Championship (OG, WC, etc) races are normally strategic, and thus slower than DL paced races!!

BTW, I'll come up with MY predicted winning marks soon!!
aaronk
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:39 am

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby TN1965 » Sat Jul 28, 2012 12:31 pm

Shalane will tell you that the marathon course has too many turns to produce a fast time. So I don't expect 2:05. 2:20 for women is possible, since Kiplagat and Keitany are planning to go at 2:17 pace. (I wonder how long they could sustain that.)

30:00 for women's 10K is almost an OR. Dibaba was in the best shape of her life 4 years ago. She is just coming back into her form after long absense. I don't expect anything close this time. I am just hoping she runs good enough to win.

Just a thought...
TN1965
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:38 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby Marlow » Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:17 pm

aaronk wrote:First thing that came to mind was YOUR response to MY predictions for Trials winning marks!!
You wrote:
"I am....skeptical....of the marks you posted."
In EVERY distance (or mid-distance) event, men and women, you predicted SLOWER times for the Trials than me.
Most of our other predictions were dissimilar too, but I'll focus here on the 800-10K.
Why were you "skeptical" of MY predicted times.....if YOURS are way faster than what "normally' happens in these races??
Meaning, that you and others have said that Championship (OG, WC, etc) races are normally strategic, and thus slower than DL paced races!!
BTW, I'll come up with MY predicted winning marks soon!!

I admit to NOTHING! :twisted:
Marlow
 
Posts: 18841
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Wow, already time for my 3-month vacation AGAIN?!

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby Jseven1 » Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:10 pm

9,000 prediction fr Dec may not be enough. In the past two weeks Eaton has improved hs three throws by 154 points over his WR in June.
Jseven1
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:11 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby Tuariki » Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:10 pm

Jseven1 wrote:9,000 prediction fr Dec may not be enough. In the past two weeks Eaton has improved hs three throws by 154 points over his WR in June.


If it is not raining then 9200 for Eaton
Tuariki
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:39 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby gh » Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:33 pm

and his support from the crowd relative to Eugene will be a small fraction thereof.
gh
 
Posts: 43502
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby k3ck3c » Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:44 am

I doubt that the winner of the Pole Vault will clear "only" 5.90

Otto has cleared 3 times 5.92, Mohr has cleared 5.91, Walker 5.90 (with a huge margin), Lavillenie has cleared 5.92, 5.93, 5.95, 5.97
to name a few.
k3ck3c
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby LopenUupunut » Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:34 am

Men

100 9.76
200 19.41
400 44.50
800 1:42.98
1500 3:34.36
3St 8:08.04
5 13:16.92
10 27:07.73
110H 12.92
400H 47.61
Mar 2:07:19
20W 1:20:15
50W 3:39:55
4x1 37.17
4x4 2:57.46
HJ 2.36
PV 5.90
LJ 8.34
TJ 17.86
SP 22.14
DT 68.29
HT 80.87
JT 86.35
Dec 8929

Women

100 10.74
200 21.86
400 49.38
800 1:55.90
1500 4:02.11
3St 9:06.64
5 14:52.77
10 30:35.40
100H 12.46
400H 52.81
Mar 2:22:22
20W 1:27.46
4x1 41.66
4x4 3:17.99
HJ 2.03
PV 4.85
LJ 7.07
TJ 14.90
SP 21.26
DT 67.61
HT 78.15
JT 69.24
Hep 6881

I'm a bit worried about predicting better winning marks than Marlow in some events... :wink:
LopenUupunut
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Sleeping in Finland

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby nianchengyu » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:00 am

W:
400mH:53.22s
SP:21.68m
DT:70.37m
hep:6933p
nianchengyu
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby tgs3 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:21 am

LopenUupunut wrote:
Dec 8929
Hep 6881


More realistic multi event scores than I've seen from others. I think people are expecting too much out of Eaton in particular. The OR and winning the gold by 200 points or so would be a very successful Olympics for him.
tgs3
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:19 am

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby jlt » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:34 am

TN1965 wrote:Shalane will tell you that the marathon course has too many turns to produce a fast time. So I don't expect 2:05. 2:20 for women is possible, since Kiplagat and Keitany are planning to go at 2:17 pace. (I wonder how long they could sustain that.)

30:00 for women's 10K is almost an OR. Dibaba was in the best shape of her life 4 years ago. She is just coming back into her form after long absense. I don't expect anything close this time. I am just hoping she runs good enough to win.

Just a thought...

Sounds just like Ryan Hall thinking in Beijing that it was too hot to run fast and that they'd fade big-time in the second half. Flanagan might think too many turns to run fast but I doubt Keitany and Edna will worry about that. My tip is that the Kenyans run great and the Americans too conservative....
jlt
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby Jseven1 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:56 pm

Dan O'Brien among others have questioned Eaton how he'll do away from home in Eugene. In the sat 3 years he's broken the heptathlon record 3 times: in Arkansas, in Tallinn, in Istanbul. Those 3 places are a long way from Hayward Field.
Jseven1
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:11 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby aaronk » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:11 am

Jeez, these are even nuttier than my Trials winning marks!!
But hell, that's what makes following the Games fun, fun, fun!!!
For what it's worth.......(WR indicates a World Record, OR an Olympics Record):
Finals only!! If a better mark occurs in the heats, semis, Q's, doesn't count in predictions!!

Men

100..........9.64 OR
200..........19.15 WR, OR
400..........44.08
800..........1:41.39 OR
1500........3:30.88 OR
5K...........12:50.26 OR
10K.........26:52.00 OR
Mar.........2:04:50 OR
SC..........7:58.05 OR
110H.......12.90 OR
400H.......47.40
HJ..........7-9 3/4 (Sorry, using English measurements here!!)
LJ..........27-7 1/2
TJ..........58-7
PV..........19-6 1/4
SP......... 72-9 1/2
DT.........229-2
JT.........290-10
HT........271-6
Dec.......9210 WR, OR
400R.....36.85 WR, OR
1600R....2:58.11

Women

100........10.64
200........21.60
400........48.72
800........1:55.35
1500......3:59.01
5K.........14:25.11 OR
10K.......29:48.00 OR
Mar.......2:18:40 OR
SC........8:56.24 WR, OR
100H.....12.31
400H.....52.80
HJ........6-9 1/2 OR
LJ........23-5 3/4
TJ.......49-6
PV.......16-4 3/4
SP.......69-10
DT......226-9
JT......231-8
HT.....262-10 WR, OR
Hept...7080
400R....41.56 OR
1600R...3:17.35

:lol: :roll:
aaronk
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:39 am

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby Jseven1 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:13 pm

I have to say that I do not find your prediction for Eaton to be ridiculous. 9210 is basically his WR from June plus the 154 improvement points in the throws from ten days or so ago. Remember his WR was in horrible weather (I was drenched). He left a lot of points on the table in the HJ, 400 and hurdles. If he doesn't jump 27 feet in the LJ this time he can pick it up in the hurdles. The PV is probably the key event.
Jseven1
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:11 pm

Re: OG Winning Marks?

Postby Powell » Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:11 pm

jlt wrote:Sounds just like Ryan Hall thinking in Beijing that it was too hot to run fast and that they'd fade big-time in the second half.


But they did. Even Wanjiru and Gharib ran the second half significantly slower than the first. Everyone else in that top group faded badly. The midway split was 1:02 and change, and in the end, 2:10:00 won bronze. It was perfectly possible for someone who started more conservatively behind the leading group to come through for a medal if they maintained their pace.
Powell
 
Posts: 8689
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Vanuatu


Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aaronk, Bing [Bot], Powell, shivfan, The Norwegian and 14 guests