kellits2gnv wrote:Heck, think that's something? In an interview a few days ago he said he wanted to run 9.9 at texas relays..
Should he NOT want to run 9.9? It's not out the realm of possibility!
I was more shocked at the idea that hes aiming to run, what would be a substantial HSR, in the middle of the season. Its completely rarified air for a high school sprinter to say they want to run sub 10 in March, let alone sub 10 at all.
Dave wrote: Have you noticed that Mr. Parsons hasn't come close to his best HS times since going to LSU? Look at the LSU site
Here's what I see:
2010 Battled a hamstring injury throughout the indoor season ... Received a redshirt during the outdoor season.
2011 Posted a 2011 wind-legal seasonal best of 10.28 Pulled up with an injury in the conference final Won the 100-meter title in his outdoor debut at the LSU Tiger Relays with a seasonal-best wind-aided time of 10.24 in the final clocked a wind-aided 10.24 at the Texas Relays
Now go back and look at Michael Johnson's first few years at Baylor . . . You have dismissed Parsons way too soon.
Dave wrote: Have you noticed that Mr. Parsons hasn't come close to his best HS times since going to LSU? Look at the LSU site
Here's what I see:
2010 Battled a hamstring injury throughout the indoor season ... Received a redshirt during the outdoor season.
2011 Posted a 2011 wind-legal seasonal best of 10.28 Pulled up with an injury in the conference final Won the 100-meter title in his outdoor debut at the LSU Tiger Relays with a seasonal-best wind-aided time of 10.24 in the final clocked a wind-aided 10.24 at the Texas Relays
Now go back and look at Michael Johnson's first few years at Baylor . . . You have dismissed Parsons way too soon.
I hope you are correct. I would love to see him really improve over his HS era performances. Also, let it be noted that I did mention injury in my first comment.
My real hope here is that Mr. Bracy is well enough coached that he can run to his potential and continue to improve. We all see that it doesn't always work out.
Dave wrote:My real hope here is that Mr. Bracy is well enough coached that he can run to his potential and continue to improve. We all see that it doesn't always work out.
My totally not-substantiated observation is that early maturers tend to continue to age faster than others, which makes them more injury-prone.
Dave wrote:My real hope here is that Mr. Bracy is well enough coached that he can run to his potential and continue to improve. We all see that it doesn't always work out.
My totally not-substantiated observation is that early maturers tend to continue to age faster than others, which makes them more injury-prone.
Given your coaching experience, I'll assume you are correct.
Dave wrote:My real hope here is that Mr. Bracy is well enough coached that he can run to his potential and continue to improve. We all see that it doesn't always work out.
My totally not-substantiated observation is that early maturers tend to continue to age faster than others, which makes them more injury-prone.
I don't know his physical maturity, maybe you do, unless you are saying that running fast at an early age is a sign of early maturation.
When assessing the implications of the 6.08, it was run with a speed that would normally get a sprinter a 6.13-6.17. The starting jump is not easily replicated but the speed is the important element and why we care.
mal wrote:I don't know his physical maturity, maybe you do, unless you are saying that running fast at an early age is a sign of early maturation. Exhibit 1. Usain Bolt. Now how did that work out for him?
Some athletic prodigies look very 'cut/defined/built' well before 18. Bracy's physique is mature. In pictures I've seen of Bolt at 16, he looked like a string bean.
mal wrote:I don't know his physical maturity, maybe you do, unless you are saying that running fast at an early age is a sign of early maturation. Exhibit 1. Usain Bolt. Now how did that work out for him?
Some athletic prodigies look very 'cut/defined/built' well before 18. Bracy's physique is mature. In pictures I've seen of Bolt at 16, he looked like a string bean.
You guys think too much. Christie ran 10.48 as a 24 year old. And I suspect he was pretty 'mature' / 'cut'. Then he got faster.
I'm happy to lay back and watch how he develops or doesn't.
mal wrote:You guys think too much. Christie ran 10.48 as a 24 year old. And I suspect he was pretty 'mature' / 'cut'. Then he got faster. I'm happy to lay back and watch how he develops or doesn't.
You're talking about a completely different kind of individual.
mal wrote:You guys think too much. Christie ran 10.48 as a 24 year old. And I suspect he was pretty 'mature' / 'cut'. Then he got faster. I'm happy to lay back and watch how he develops or doesn't.
You're talking about a completely different kind of individual.
Enlighten me?
He developed dramatically after the age of 24.
Surprised?
And to be pedantic, completely different is a part of being an individual.
Bracy ran a windy (2.1) 10.37 today in the prelims. Video isn't the best, but it looks like he eased up quite a bit at the end. That kid is an incredibly advanced starter for an 18 year old.
JumboElliott wrote:Bracy ran a windy (2.1) 10.37 today in the prelims. Video isn't the best, but it looks like he eased up quite a bit at the end. That kid is an incredibly advanced starter for an 18 year old.
It's hard to have consecutive years of good health at any age. If everything comes together right at an early stage there's a component of luck involved in that too. When you add longevity of course some are going to hit a wall as that can happen any time and the more years you compete the less likely you're always number one. It might not be the waning prowess of precocious kids so much as others putting missteps behind them and taking their turn. If you peak at 17 and can't say the same at 25 I don't know that's any more unusual than breaking out at 22 and being done by 30. A lot can happen year on year and usually does. And of course you must factor in the senior ranks being ultimately more competitive because you have multiple cohorts of athletes eligible all the time. Youth and experience each has a chance, and you wouldn't expect the same guy to win every year even if you raced your peers in perpetuity.
JumboElliott wrote:Windy (2.4) 10.06 today. 9.9x certainly isn't out of the question.
'Basically' that's a 10.07 with +2.0, a 10.12 with +1.0 and 10.17 with 0.0. Not too shabby.
He ran a pair of 10.0s with 2m/s in June and July last year so he's showing a very consistent baseline to be opening with the same in March. His legal best was in line with the best youth times ever run although technically he wasn't a youth by a couple of weeks. Historically speaking the junior record hasn't always been run by the eldest kids, though. Demps and Brown were both 18 when they ran their 10.01, although they each had another year of eligibility and Bracy does not. He's in a similar boat to Blake, who actually got injured in the equivalent year. I think the windy marks last year fall in the same range as Blake's 10.11. If Bracy is the real deal a 9.9 is to be expected, soon.
Bracy is entered in 100m at Florida Relays on Friday too. 3PM race start.
Along with cousin Levonte Whitfield(jr. Jones, Orlando) 10.39w this year. He reopened up recruiting process after verbally committing to Miami(10.31PB) Kendall Williams(so, Stanton, Jacksonville) 10.39w Anthony Brown(sr, Hillsborough) 10.50
Sad to see Dade County public schools will not be able to compete due to restrictions by the school board on travel during religious holiday. Artie Burns is running incredibly this year 13.35 and 36.06.
Bracy had a poor-ish start, went straight up, and was up and down about 3 times in his 10.06.
All he needs is a good group to get a better feel for racing and running under more pressure and he will have a breakthrough. Not improvement. Breakthrough.