Return to Current Events

¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:48.00

Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby SQUACKEE » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:12 am

gh wrote:let's see which of us remembers to bump this a year from now1


Which one? Probably they guy who gets it right! :P What's on the line, bragging rights. :twisted:

I have Bek and you have the rest of the best and the best of the rest. 8-)

I call that a bargain, the best I ever had! :D
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12874
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby John G » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:34 am

Alan Shank wrote:
John G wrote:It was great to see Bekele win but somehow seeing him run like a mortal was a little sad. Sprinting down the home straight he just didn't look like his old self - short strides, slightly uneven running style with much more arm action. I felt like watching Geb in 2004. I don't think Jeilan and Mo need to lose sleep.


It seems to me you are comparing Bekele when not fully fit to Mo/Jeylan fully fit. I think it is absolutely amazing that Bekele was able to come back and run 26:43. Yes, his finish was not like pre-2010 Bekele, but if he is able to train properly for London, I think he will be very difficult to beat. He may decide he has to run a longer kick, as he has done several times in the 5K, but he is perfectly capable of doing that. He has shown the ability to run any kind of race, with or without pacemaking. If I were Jeylan or Mo, I would lose sleep after seeing what Bekele just did.

Also, what about Lucas Rotich? He's 21, and finished just 10th in his heat at the Kenyan NC in Nairobi, 12th at Pre in 27:12.
Cheers,
Alan Shank
Woodland, CA, USA


Absolutely - I realise I was watching a less than fully fit Bek. I also agree that he will utilise a longer run for home next year because his kick is unlikley to ever return to it's former level.

I'd never compare a Mo or Jeilan to a fully fit Bekele. I just don't think we'll ever see a fully fit version again. I can't recall any runner who was able to dominate for 7 years, take a year or two off with serious injury and then come back at the same level.

Thanks for info on Rotich. Reminded me of the emergence of Kemboi against Geb in Brussels in 2003.
John G
 
Posts: 699
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby SQUACKEE » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:08 am

John G wrote: I can't recall any runner who was able to dominate for 7 years, take a year or two off with serious injury and then come back at the same level.
.


Do you recall one who came back after 1-2 years with a serious injury and running the fastest time of the year?
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12874
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby 26mi235 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:03 am

Well, since there are only 2-4 fast 10,000 per year, it is not quite the same, especially since a couple of those are early in the year before the runners are in peak form.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14606
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby SQUACKEE » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:09 am

[quote="26mi235"]Well, since there are only 2-4 fast 10,000 per year, it is not quite the same, especially since a couple of those are early in the year before the runners are in peak form.[/quote]
Yeah, like Bek was! :lol:
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12874
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby doug5321 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:21 am

in the brussels 10k no one seems to even be mentioning geoffrey kirui who has a birthdate of 1993 and ran 26:55, he still has another year as a junior.
doug5321
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 6:08 pm

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby 26mi235 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:47 am

SQUACKEE wrote:
26mi235 wrote:Well, since there are only 2-4 fast 10,000 per year, it is not quite the same, especially since a couple of those are early in the year before the runners are in peak form.[/quote]
Yeah, like Bek was! :lol:


Yes, but you are already including Bek's not being in peak form but not necessarily the rest of the contenders.

Bek will have to do this in a championship race, not one where he can sit and kick at the end. Because there are more suitors for that top spot, it will be harder to control the race. My guess is that someone goes from further out and it will be interesting to see if it can be maintained through to the finish or if several of those distanced early have enough to reel the leaders back in.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14606
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby kuha » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:08 am

26mi235 wrote:Because there are more suitors for that top spot, it will be harder to control the race.


But, in general, championship races are the easiest things in the world to predict: the pace for the first 60%-70% will be very modest, with a gradual increase from there on, and an all-out last 800/600m. Everyone knows this and everyone is (or should be) prepared for it.

What would truly interest me would be some deviation from this predictable scenario: something along the lines of Halberg, Ngugi, etc., or another Bedford-style from-the-gun blast.
kuha
 
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby gh » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:11 am

doug5321 wrote:in the brussels 10k no one seems to even be mentioning geoffrey kirui who has a birthdate of 1993 and ran 26:55, he still has another year as a junior.


As Kuha said on the Aman thread

<<For the millionth time, none of us should get excited about these so-called "17-yr old" athletes on the basis of reputed age. The only thing that matters is their actual performances, which are impressive enough for any 25 yr. old.>>
gh
 
Posts: 43176
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: just where I wanna be

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby TN1965 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:56 pm

kuha wrote:
26mi235 wrote:Because there are more suitors for that top spot, it will be harder to control the race.


But, in general, championship races are the easiest things in the world to predict: the pace for the first 60%-70% will be very modest, with a gradual increase from there on, and an all-out last 800/600m. Everyone knows this and everyone is (or should be) prepared for it.

What would truly interest me would be some deviation from this predictable scenario: something along the lines of Halberg, Ngugi, etc., or another Bedford-style from-the-gun blast.


Maybe Bitan Karoki could surprise the field with his big surge in the middle... if he can survive the Kenyan trial first.

But then again, Jeilan handled him easily at the African Games, so he may not have much of an impact after all.
TN1965
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:38 pm

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby IanS_Liv » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:49 pm

I'm sorry. I just don't see how a guy goes from dropping out of a race at 27:30 pace, trailing behind at that, to running 26:43 less than 3 weeks later, especially given it was his second race in two years. Eight weeks later, yes. Why didn't he run in London? Did the heat in Daegu affect him? Is Brussels just a place he associates with running fast?

I'm so pleased for Rupp though. He's been on the verge of sub 27 a couple of times. His being pally with Mo Farah has helped us Brits get to know him.
IanS_Liv
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby pickle47 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:47 pm

kuha wrote:
26mi235 wrote:Because there are more suitors for that top spot, it will be harder to control the race.


But, in general, championship races are the easiest things in the world to predict: the pace for the first 60%-70% will be very modest, with a gradual increase from there on, and an all-out last 800/600m. Everyone knows this and everyone is (or should be) prepared for it.

What would truly interest me would be some deviation from this predictable scenario: something along the lines of Halberg, Ngugi, etc., or another Bedford-style from-the-gun blast.


12:57 for the last 5k is a pretty effective tactic. Only employed once and got the desired result.
pickle47
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Another perfect day in So Cal

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby nevetsllim » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:31 am

Bekele didn't look at his absolute best but I'm sure he'll be better next year. His form looked reminiscent of his post-Mombasa track form in the early part of 2007. So many people were writing him off and saying he might never be the same athlete but after a few unconvincing victories in May/June, I saw him blast to an almost solo 7:26 3000m in the rain in Sheffield.
nevetsllim
 
Posts: 6102
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:54 am

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby SQUACKEE » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:56 am

nevetsllim wrote:Bekele didn't look at his absolute best but I'm sure he'll be better next year. His form looked reminiscent of his post-Mombasa track form in the early part of 2007. So many people were writing him off and saying he might never be the same athlete but after a few unconvincing victories in May/June, I saw him blast to an almost solo 7:26 3000m in the rain in Sheffield.


Look out, you are in danger of being accused of smittenity! :P
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12874
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby nevetsllim » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:19 am

SQUACKEE wrote:
nevetsllim wrote:Bekele didn't look at his absolute best but I'm sure he'll be better next year. His form looked reminiscent of his post-Mombasa track form in the early part of 2007. So many people were writing him off and saying he might never be the same athlete but after a few unconvincing victories in May/June, I saw him blast to an almost solo 7:26 3000m in the rain in Sheffield.


Look out, you are in danger of being accused of smittenity! :P


Don't get me wrong I don't think he'll ever get back to his peak but I think he can still challenge for global titles especially at 10,000m. He's still not that old and while Bekele has been injured for two years, Gebrselassie still enjoyed a very good season in 2003 despite missing nearly all of the 2001-02 track seasons through injury. Geb still came back to win silver behind a close-to-peak Bekele in Paris before his second fastest time ever in Brussels. I don't think Bekele will be facing anyone as good as he was in 2003-05 next year.
nevetsllim
 
Posts: 6102
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:54 am

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby 26mi235 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:06 am

They may not be as good, but they will be comparable. I think that if a rested Mo Farah is in that race he keeps up with/ahead of Bekele and wins the race. Rupp trailed off at the last 400 or so meters, just where the difference between Rupp and Mo becomes apparent.
26mi235
 
Posts: 14606
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Alan Shank » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:53 am

IanS_Liv wrote:I'm sorry. I just don't see how a guy goes from dropping out of a race at 27:30 pace, trailing behind at that, to running 26:43 less than 3 weeks later, especially given it was his second race in two years.


The difference in conditions between Daegu and Brussels, combined with another three weeks of training, including the "race practice" in the WC 10K, explain the difference in outcome. Or are you implying something else?
Cheers,
Alan Shank
Woodland, CA, USA
Alan Shank
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: N38 40, W 121 52

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby SQUACKEE » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:59 am

Alan Shank wrote:
IanS_Liv wrote:I'm sorry. I just don't see how a guy goes from dropping out of a race at 27:30 pace, trailing behind at that, to running 26:43 less than 3 weeks later, especially given it was his second race in two years.


The difference in conditions between Daegu and Brussels, combined with another three weeks of training, including the "race practice" in the WC 10K, explain the difference in outcome. Or are you implying something else?
Cheers,
Alan Shank
Woodland, CA, USA

If he is implying something sinister, you must explain to me why Bek wouldnt do what he did for the worlds, why would he wait for brussels?
SQUACKEE
 
Posts: 12874
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Heaven-In front of stereo listenin to re-mastered Beatles

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Brian » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:25 pm

Alan Shank wrote:
IanS_Liv wrote:I'm sorry. I just don't see how a guy goes from dropping out of a race at 27:30 pace, trailing behind at that, to running 26:43 less than 3 weeks later, especially given it was his second race in two years.


The difference in conditions between Daegu and Brussels, combined with another three weeks of training, including the "race practice" in the WC 10K, explain the difference in outcome. Or are you implying something else?
Cheers,
Alan Shank
Woodland, CA, USA


When someone is injured--or coming off a long layoff from injury--inconsistency is pretty much a given for a while.
.
Brian
 
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Brian » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:33 pm

Also, we need to remember these guys are professional athletes. Pride and country do of course matter, but I'm sure Bekele had thousands of more reasons to hang tough through the discomfort at Brussels. When we're talking livelihood and taking care of your family, these things matter a lot.
.
Brian
 
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby IanS_Liv » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:28 pm

I'm not particularly implying anything sinister, I just find the turn around in such a short time puzzling. It's just that I've always understood that it's your endurance work in the winter that gives you the form and strength to run so hard for so long in the summer, with tapering and speedwork to give you your edge. Maybe he had time to do catch up on the latter aspect and Daegu was too early?

I am a little sceptical about the long distances though, in general terms.
IanS_Liv
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Conor Dary » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:14 pm

By the way Rupp is the first American to break 4:20 per mile for 10k, ie 13 flat for 3. A time when I was growing up was still a big deal.
Conor Dary
 
Posts: 6297
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: कनोर दारी in Ronald MacDonald's Home Town, and once a Duck always a Duck.

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Dave » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:48 pm

So who ran the last 5000 in 12:57? Bekele, Farah, or Rupp?
Dave
 
Posts: 1889
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:16 pm

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Half Miler » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:06 pm

Conor Dary wrote:By the way Rupp is the first American to break 4:20 per mile for 10k, ie 13 flat for 3. A time when I was growing up was still a big deal.


Yes! I remember the T&FN cover of Paul Geis breaking 13 for the 3-mile, sometime in the '70s.

Makes Bekele's feat of back-to-back 13:08 5ks seem even more impossible.
Half Miler
 
Posts: 2677
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: infinite loupe

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby 3 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:07 pm

Rupp-like breakthroughs (from 27-minutes to sub-26'50 and lower), including Rupp:

Sammy Kipketer (28'16"2A to 26'49"38); Josphat Bett (28'18"0A to 26'48"99); Imane Merga (27'33"53 to 26'48"35); Assefa Mezgebu (27'18"28 to 26'49"90); Mo Farah (27'14"07 to 26'46"57); Lucas Rotich (27'12"24 to 26'43"98); Galen Rupp (27'10"74 to 26'48"00); Salah Hissou (27'09"30 to 26'38"08); Moses Mosop (27'08"96 to 26'49"55); Boniface Kiprop (27'04"00 to 26'39"77); Moses Masai (27'03"20 to 26'49"20)

(All-time Athletics)
3
 
Posts: 1282
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:22 am
Location: Floor 13.

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby kuha » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:08 am

pickle47 wrote:12:57 for the last 5k is a pretty effective tactic. Only employed once and got the desired result.


Yes. However, as a "case study" of one, this is clearly the exception that proves the general rule. Interestingly, this data point "proves" both that a 12:57 last half will win, and that a 12:58 last half won't! A rather daunting "lesson" for today''s athletes.
kuha
 
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: 3rd row, on the finish line

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Davidokun » Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:17 am

Dave wrote:So who ran the last 5000 in 12:57? Bekele, Farah, or Rupp?

Bekele to win the world championship in 2003
Davidokun
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:31 am
Location: Brea, California

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby nevetsllim » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:01 am

IanS_Liv wrote:I'm not particularly implying anything sinister, I just find the turn around in such a short time puzzling. It's just that I've always understood that it's your endurance work in the winter that gives you the form and strength to run so hard for so long in the summer, with tapering and speedwork to give you your edge. Maybe he had time to do catch up on the latter aspect and Daegu was too early?

I am a little sceptical about the long distances though, in general terms.


Surely it's not that much different to Paula's comebacks in 2004 and 2008?

The pace was fluctuating quite a lot in the world 10,000m final in Daegu and while I didn't see the Brussels 10,000m, I'm guessing it was a bit more steady given that race had pacemakers in. I've always thought this will find you out if you're not in tip-top shape (Paula pretty much said the same thing after dropping out of the Athens 10,000m where halfway was reached in a fairly modest time but in an uneven pace).
nevetsllim
 
Posts: 6102
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:54 am

Re: ¶Brussels m10K (non-DL)—Bekele 26:43.16 WL, Rupp AR 26:4

Postby Master Po » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:25 pm

bump
Master Po
 
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: north coast USA

Previous

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 26mi235, beebee, Bing [Bot], JumboElliott, Mighty Favog, olorin and 19 guests