No IOC Action Against Jerome Young


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Postby gh » Wed Sep 24, 2003 8:43 am

(at least not for now)

http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?t ... 1000106059

(not sure how IAAF can do anything but be bound by the earlier CAS decision)
gh
 
Posts: 46335
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Postby MJD » Wed Sep 24, 2003 9:28 am

>(at least not for
>now)

http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?type
>2&cat=0400&id=200309240921000106059

(not sure
>how IAAF can do anything but be bound by the
>earlier CAS decision)

Two different slants on the same meeting?

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/s ... oly24.html
MJD
 
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Postby tandfman » Wed Sep 24, 2003 9:33 am

>Two different slants on the same meeting?<

I don't think so. My read is that the Seattle Times article came out before the Wednesday IOC press conference.
tandfman
 
Posts: 15043
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Postby MJD » Wed Sep 24, 2003 9:42 am

>I
>don't think so. My read is that the Seattle
>Times article came out before the Wednesday IOC
>press conference.

Probably right. Looked at the date and not the time.
MJD
 
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Postby michael lewis » Wed Sep 24, 2003 4:18 pm

Let them eat steroids.
michael lewis
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Postby MJD » Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:42 am

>I don't think so. My read is that the Seattle
>Times article came out before the Wednesday IOC
>press conference.

So what is going on?

“...read the decision taken by the USATF (USA Track and Field) Doping Appeal Board [regarding the Young case] and cannot understand how, based on the facts presently available to the Commission, any authority could have reached the conclusion that there was no doping offense.”

http://www.letsrun.com/2003/wadayoung.php
MJD
 
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beebee, Bing [Bot], Pierre-Jean and 14 guests