ESPN2's first night of coverage


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Half Miler » Tue Aug 26, 2003 11:19 pm

Yeah, sure, it sucked.

About what I expected-- highlights only of the 10k, clips of only the top 3 field event finishers, 20 freakin' minutes of one false-start-delayed semifinal of the 100h. And Carol was only marginally awful.

But then it struck me. What's really missing is the emotion. The commentators (and production in general) just lacked excitement for anything that was going on. Seems the last time I can remember real WC passion coming through the TV was back at Tokyo in '91. Of course, that was when NBC did a decent job with the whole thing. With every meet on cable recently it seems the announcers just don't really care about what they're covering.

In contrast, I've been glued to my computer screen for the past 4 days, entranced by the live TEXT messaging on the Eurosport site! (yes, with all the exclamation points!!!). The enthusiasm of the reporter is just wonderful, and reading as the events unfold gives me a great little vicarious experience, infinitely more excitement than I had on my couch tonight.

I need to get CBC.
Half Miler
 
Posts: 2792
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: infinite loupe

Re: ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 27, 2003 3:01 am

>I need to get CBC.

Hey, they're not perfect. Don Whitman is at least as bad as Carol Lewis, and I hope Mike Smith had more emotion as an athlete than he does as an announcer.

BUT . . . it's obvious that CBC cares. They're putting up 26 hours of coverage all in prime viewing hours, and they sent one of their top guys (Ron MacLean, Don Cherry's foil) to Paris. They put as much into this as the US networks put into the NBA Finals or the World Series.

If the CBC would replace their announcers with Larry Rawson and Dwight Stones, then we'd have a broadcast almost as good as being there in person.
Guest
 

Re: ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Half Miler » Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:49 am

If the CBC would replace their
>announcers with Larry Rawson...

You've got to be kidding.
Rawson, though fairly knowledgeable and workmanlike, has no personality whatsoever. He defines emotionless. I'll take the Eurosport text updates over Rawson anytime.
Half Miler
 
Posts: 2792
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: infinite loupe

Re: ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:55 am

I'd rather have an emotionless guy who knows his stuff, than a flashy guy who annoys me with inane blather. I want insight into what's going on between the lines, than a great 'camera presence.'
Guest
 

Re: ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Alan » Wed Aug 27, 2003 10:26 am

Given the box the ESPN crew (production and announcing) was put in for its initial telecast on Tuesday, August 26 -- having to blend some same-day (Tuesday) events with those from earlier days, all in a two-hour period -- I thought it did a good job.

Yes, a lot of the coverage was scanty, but I doubt it was the decision of the crew in Paris to devote so few hours of coverage to the meet.

On the positive side, the coverage moved the events along at a good pace, in my opinion, and there were some good camera angles for the track events.

Would I rather have CBC coverage (which I was fortunate to receive during my years living in Buffalo, NY)? Absolutely. But last night's ESPN2 broadcast was no worse -- and probably better -- than most of ESPN/ESPN2's usual T&F coverage.

There shouldn't be a need for as much compression of events in the remaining nights' coverage, so hopefully things will improve.
Alan
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Guest » Wed Aug 27, 2003 10:51 am

>If the CBC would replace their
>announcers with
>Larry Rawson...

You've got to be
>kidding.
Rawson, though fairly knowledgeable and
>workmanlike, has no personality whatsoever. He
>defines emotionless.>

Rawson is a track nerd. Fits right in with some of the unemotional nerds on this board who are busy tssk tssking about everything that wouldn' have happened in 1936. Charlie Jones' call of Ben Johnson's WR is still the best track call I've ever heard.

jd
Guest
 

Re: ESPN2's first night of coverage

Postby Randy Treadway » Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:19 am

Have you heard the '64 Olympics 10K call (the Billy Mills race)? It's on the web. Sends shivers up your spine.

Oh yeh, I forgot- anything older than Generation X-Y-Z alphabet soup is ancient and without merit.

Jones is okay as far as current American announcers go, but there's nothing to compare him too- he has no competition. I know he's a big track fan and loves the sport, which is a plus, but I have to admit his 'call' voice drives me up the wall. He calls EVERYTHING like the WR race you mentioned, whether the race has any significance or not. Tone it down and save the yelling for the REALLY spectacular performances. There are some baseball announcers like that too, that I hear on my DirecTV dish- they're constantly yelling, even when it's a midseason dull game.
Spectacular performances seem more spectacular when the excitement, volume and tone of announcer's voice is in proportion to the quality of the performance that is being shown. That means you need to tone it DOWN when the performance is less than spectacular.

I like Lawson pretty well- but he's a commentator, not a play-by-play man. The booth needs both.
Randy Treadway
 
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], KDFINE, norunner, nztrackfan, smc and 10 guests