w400m


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

w400m

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 25, 2003 11:08 am

The bewildering inability for the US to come up with top of the line women 400m results in international championships continues.
Guest
 

Re: w400m

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 25, 2003 11:13 am

Which is why Marion should give the 100/400 double some thought next year, if the Olympic schedule permits it.
Guest
 

Re: w400m

Postby michael lewis » Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:02 pm

I can't wait to see what Felix will do in that event.
michael lewis
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am

Re: w400m

Postby blacklily » Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:49 pm

>The bewildering inability for the US to come up
>with top of the line women 400m results in
>international championships continues.

The team we went this year to Paris was young, cut them some slack. Give it time before we judge them so harshly.
blacklily
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: w400m

Postby Guest » Tue Aug 26, 2003 7:07 am

>>The bewildering inability for the US to come
>up
>with top of the line women 400m results
>in
>international championships
>continues.

The team we went this year to Paris
>was young, cut them some slack. Give it time
>before we judge them so harshly.>

Who's talking about this year? The US women, other than JMC, have not had any major success at the top level in international competition in recent WC or OG. They need to understand that there is no penalty for cracking the 50.5 mark.
Guest
 

Re: w400m

Postby MJR » Tue Aug 26, 2003 7:57 am

The team we went this year to Paris
>was young, cut them some slack. Give it time
>before we judge them so harshly.

Yes, they are, but in the US there has not been a top Int'l threat in the 400m since Diane Dixon. That is sad, very sad!
MJR
 
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: on walkabout....

Re: w400m

Postby Guest » Tue Aug 26, 2003 8:02 am

"The team we went this year to Paris
>was young, cut them some slack. Give it time
>before we judge them so harshly.

Yes, they are, but in the US there has not been a top Int'l threat in the 400m since Diane Dixon. That is sad, very sad!"

Mostly true; I suppose one could have considered Jearl Miles-Clark an international threat a few years ago, when she ran 49.40. But that's about it. I'm getting pretty sick of Monique Hennigan et. al struggle to break the big 51-second barrier.
Guest
 

Re: w400m

Postby Guest » Tue Aug 26, 2003 8:12 am

Mostly true; I suppose one could have
>considered Jearl Miles-Clark an international
>threat a few years ago, when she ran 49.40. But
>that's about it. I'm getting pretty sick of
>Monique Hennigan et. al struggle to break the big
>51-second barrier.>

I'd think an athlete that won a gold and two bronze at the WC would be considered an international threat.

That said the rest of the gang has been reasonably mediocre which, considering the sprint capabilities of this country, is bewildering to me.
Guest
 

Re: w400m

Postby Guest » Tue Aug 26, 2003 12:51 pm

Which also begs the question of whether our best 400 runners are those running in the 100. The last top 100 sprinter who was also an excellent 400 runner was Gwen Torrence (10.82/21.72/49.64), and she didn't run the 400 that much, yet she was able to rank in the top 10 worldwide 3 times.
Guest
 

Re: w400m

Postby Guest » Tue Aug 26, 2003 2:09 pm

Be patient! You guys have acquired the worlds number 1 junior in Sanya and you went 1-2 at last years world juniors.

Now if only University of Texas would co operate and don't burn her out like they did with Suzian Reid ......

Then maybe....
Guest
 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aaronk, Bing [Bot], donley2, gktrack, maroon, sjm1368 and 16 guests