>This isn't a race issue -- it's a weight issue!
>Just look at the talented Kenyans and
>Ethiopians: Nearly all of these guys are tiny.
>I've seen some of the East Africans at races in
>D.C., and their legs, their bodies, are just so
>thin -- obviously because they train so hard,
>but compare them to the elite Americans
>(Kennedy, Goucher, Pre, other than a very few,
>and other than those who have immigrated
>recently): the Americans are huge! (Webb
>included. El G, by the way, makes Webb look
>like Arnold.) Combine that with their obvious
>advantage being born at altitude in societies
>where physical exertion is the norm. I just
>don't see that many kids with body types like
>the East Africans (though I'm sure there will be
>those who disagree . . .)so until we have a
>fleet of really thin speedsters, we're going to
>have guys like Webb who are kind of small and
>very powerful at 400 but not likely to carry
>that much farther than that . . .
Exactly. In the US a kid built to run distance is very rare. In Kenya its the norm. The talent pool for distance runner in E. Africa is much larger. However, it is very unlikely that we will soon see a world class Ethiopian powerlifter.
>>This isn't a race issue -- it's a weight
With 280+ million Americans, you can find lots of people of any size and shape. We've got plenty of jockeys -- the guys built for running are out there. But they don't choose running in overwhelming numbers.
>>>This isn't a race issue -- it's a
With 280+ million Americans,
>you can find lots of people of any size and
>shape. We've got plenty of jockeys -- the guys
>built for running are out there. But they don't
>choose running in overwhelming numbers.
What sport do you think they are going into? Football? Basketball? Guys who are built for distance running don't have that many options. Usually they will find they have a talent for running in elementary or middle school and follow that talent into h.s. We do have plenty of good high school runners but they just don't improve much in college. Its either because they don't have as much talent as the Africans, the sytem is hurting them or a combination of the two.
i think the size of americans 70% overweight hurts distance running, but also i read in 1983 we had over 200 sub 2.20 marathoners. we now have about 30 and dropping per year.so were not doing as good now. steve scott john walker, tom byers were big for distance runners. training and lifestyle and diet would get americans to the size of distance runners, i sometimes see former teammates from 20 years ago who were 120-150 pounds now everyone of them is close to 200 or more. another thing is when we do have a runner who runs a great time, holman, falcon and others they do not do it consistently or over as long a period of time as scott and runners from before.
even in the marathon rob de castella and derick clayton were big for marathoners, and herb lindsey was one of the top runners up to half marathon. (i dont know if he ever ran a marathon) i remember pictures of him running with craig virgin and others and he looked huge comparatively. east africans gain weight also if they let up on their training, didnt henry rono get well over 200 pounds after breaking records, then lost the weight and ran 13.06 for 5k breaking his own world record. i just dont think enough runners in the us have the work ethic anymore. look at how hard runners trained back then. bill rodgers ran 130 to 170 a week for well over a decade while racing almost every week. i believe he even won a ten miler on saturday after winning boston in 209 on monday one year, i read steve scott ran workouts like 20 times half,10 x mile, 40 x up a 200 meter hill. alberto salazar says he was always overtraining, yet he ran a world best marathon and 13.11 and 27.25 for the 5 and 10k when the records were i believe 13.08 and 27.22 was he overtrained and did it effect his prformance negatively? i dont know his training was probably excellent to achieve what he did. now a days i look at running magazines and the cover is always filled with articles on not overtraining, i think maybe the body can do more than the labs say it can.
What will it take for U.S. runners to become more competitive with the East Africans? If we're talking distance running (not middle distance running as the original poster posited), then the answer is that we need to allow more athletes from Kenya, Ethiopia, Somalia, etc. to become American citizens. It's no coincidence that our AR holder at the 10k is Meb, or that Abdi is one of the top American distance runners. And it's not because they are "tougher" through circumcision rituals or some other rite of passage. It is because they have immense natural gifts and a dedicated work ethic. The posters who talk about a bigger talent pool in East Africa than we have here in the U.S. are correct. If we scientifically screened all 280 million Americans, it is unlikely that we would come up with a pool of talent to match what would be found in Kenya alone.
What sport do you think they are
>going into? Football? Basketball? Guys who are
>built for distance running don't have that many
Yeah, they do have lots of options at the high school level. Lots of potential distance runners play HS football, basketball and baseball -- they're generally only good enough to play at that level and quit competitive sports when they graduate. Check out your basic small high school's roster, and you will see lots of guys listed at 5'9"/140 lbs; endurance training can easily make them the 5'9"/125 lbs necessary for high-quality distance running. For example, Alan Webb had the speed and physique necessary to start at cornerback & WR for an mediocre small-town team; I'm willing to bet there are dozens more like him (smart, fast, hard-working and tough with good endurance) going through two-a-days right now.
No, the pros at other sports can't be great distance runners. The guys the USA misses never even try distance running -- and it's not that they're afraid of hard work, but rather than they want some prestige for their efforts. Talking a 16-year-old boy into cross country is no easy mark, pal, especially if he's got any chance of playing regularly on even an awful football or basketball team. Prestige is terribly important to teenagers, and they definitely notice that the hottest chicks in the school cheer on the sidelines for some sports and not others.
>If we scientifically screened all 280 million
>Americans, it is unlikely that we would come up
>with a pool of talent to match what would be
>found in Kenya alone.
Hey, they KENYANS aren't any better than the rest of the world, if you eliminate the Kalenjin. It's one tribe within the broader nation that dominates everything. They're only good at one sport -- distance running.
But we arrogant Americans assume that we should dominate the world in EVERY sport. We're the best at baseball, basketball, football, tennis, golf, sprints/hurdles/jumps, NASCAR, figure skating, swimming, triathlon; the soccer people talk about winning the World Cup (and already dominate the women's side). We're #2 at ice hockey, and we sponsor the best team and individual in pro cycling. So we assume we should specialize in everything, which is simply not possible. Why should we have any chance against societies that put everything into just one sport?
But we arrogant Americans
>assume that we should dominate the world in EVERY
>sport. We're the best at baseball, basketball,
>football, tennis, golf, sprints/hurdles/jumps,
>NASCAR, figure skating, swimming, triathlon; the
>soccer people talk about winning the World Cup
>(and already dominate the women's side). We're
>#2 at ice hockey, and we sponsor the best team
>and individual in pro cycling. So we assume we
>should specialize in everything, which is simply
>not possible. Why should we have any chance
>against societies that put everything into just
Arrogant Americans? Maybe, but for good reason as you stated above. I would prefer to think of it as "high expectations". It is difficult for Americans to be the best in every sport but our expectations are bringing us pretty close.
Distance running is a bit of an exception to the rule of most American sports where hard work, team play and the classically physically dominant athlete (American stereotype - stong and fast) win out. As stated above we don't have the numbers the East African countries have of the physically "ideal" distance runner.
However, I do think we should be able to have more milers at the Elite level as larger stature athletes can succeed at this distance (John Walker, Steve Scott, Ovett etc.).