Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?


Main message board: for the discussion of topical track & field items only.

Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:24 pm

Who is going to win? Mac, Henry or Browne?
Guest
 

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:39 pm

I'm predicting Anson Henry 1st. MAC 2nd and Pierre 3rd.
Guest
 

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Thu Jul 17, 2003 7:08 am

Where is it going to be held?
Guest
 

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Thu Jul 17, 2003 1:50 pm

in canada haha. oh yes henry will win but he cant beat me haha
Guest
 

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Thu Jul 17, 2003 2:31 pm

Are you guys aware that Mac ran a 9.96w, and 9.91w at the last Canadian Champs. The pressure will be down for him, because of his recent troubles at the GP meets, and he will relax. Athletes like Mac tend to peak at their own championships i.e Marcin Jedurski of Poland (10.07w,20.38w) and Shingo Suetsugu (10.03). The colligate sprinters are always tired by now. I think we will see a fast 100m. None of these guys will do anything at the Worlds.
Guest
 

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby gh » Thu Jul 17, 2003 4:58 pm

Macro must be made of lighter stuff than most people (no, that's not a skin joke). Look at his seasonal bests:

1999--10.33 windy
2000--10.18 high altitude
2001--10.20 (legal! how did that slip in? :-)
2002--9.91 windy, legal best 10.25 at altitude
2003--10.03 high altitude

Or is it just that the Canadian federation is exceeding good at shipping him to places where he can beat the game (i.e., get A standards) by taking advantage of the wind/altitude situation?
gh
 
Posts: 46321
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby MJD » Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:09 pm

>Or is
>it just that the Canadian federation is exceeding
>good at shipping him to places where he can beat
>the game (i.e., get A standards) by taking
>advantage of the wind/altitude situation?

He might be good at it but I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with AC. They barely get involved with funding teams to go places let alone individuals.
MJD
 
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Per Andersen » Thu Jul 17, 2003 9:29 pm

>Or is it just that Canadian federation is exceedingly good at shipping him to places where he can beat the game.
They sure did, just 2or 3 years ago. They had altitude camps at Flagstaff for several seasons where everybody who was anything got 4 or 5 chances to run sprints day in and day out so they could get on some team or other. Of course lots of these people never came close to these times at sea level. Believe it or not they even sent Hammer throwers to Flagstaff.
Per Andersen
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby MJD » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:58 am

>>Or is it just that Canadian federation is
>exceedingly good at shipping him to places where
>he can beat the game.
>They sure did,

I could be wrong but I don't think that was something that was funded by AC.
MJD
 
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Powell » Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:10 am

1999--10.33 windy
2000--10.18
>high altitude
2001--10.20 (legal! how did that
>slip in? :-)
2002--9.91 windy, legal best 10.25
>at altitude
2003--10.03 high altitude

Or is
>it just that the Canadian federation is exceeding
>good at shipping him to places where he can beat
>the game (i.e., get A standards) by taking
>advantage of the wind/altitude situation?

Windy bests don't do him much good as far as achieving qualifying standards is concerned. Anyway, if you look at US sprinters, a lot of them run their fastest times wind- or altitude-aided. Obviously, if these factors help you, it means you will be more likely to run faster at altitude or with strong headwind, so even you only get 1 or 2 such races per season, the chances are pretty good that you will run your SB in one of them.
Powell
 
Posts: 9063
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:32 am
Location: Vanuatu

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Fri Jul 18, 2003 8:57 am

Mac does run good with wind, and at altitude, but that doesn't say much. He has been training full time for a while now, and the other 2 college guys are running just as good as him, going to school as well
Guest
 

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby gh » Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:14 am

Windy bests don't do him much good
>as far as achieving qualifying standards is
>concerned. Anyway, if you look at US sprinters, a
>lot of them run their fastest times wind- or
>altitude-aided.>>

Well, actually, no they don't. At least not on a quick search. I originally showed that in 4 of the last 5 seasons Macro had his best time w/ either wind or altitude aid. So now I looked at the top 5 U.S.-ranked sprinters of last year, and here's how many of the last 5 years they had a windy/altitude mark as their fastest of the year.

Macro 4

Montgomery 2
Mo 1
Drummond 1
Miller 1 (didn't run one year)
Williams 0
gh
 
Posts: 46321
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am
Location: firmly at Arya's side!

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby MJD » Sat Jul 19, 2003 1:59 pm

>I'm predicting Anson Henry 1st. MAC 2nd and
>Pierre 3rd.
Macro, Browne, Henry.
MJD
 
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:31 am

Re: Who's gonna win Candian Nationals?

Postby Guest » Sat Jul 19, 2003 5:30 pm

Can I pick races or WHAT! I predicted Mac would win in 10.08, and he won in 10.13. I was only .05 off. I knew he would peak at these championships and the college guys would be tired. Browne ran a good race though.
Men 100 Meter Dash
=========================================================================
Name Year Team Prelims Finals
=========================================================================
Section 1 Finals Wind: 1.3
1 186 Macrozonaris, Nico Laval, QC 10.42 10.13
2 40 Browne, Pierre Toronto, ON 10.42 10.16
3 126 Henry, Anson Pickering, ON 10.38 10.27
4 288 Sterling, Rhoan Cambridge, ON 10.52 10.46
5 305 Tomlin, Dave Kitchener, ON 10.55 10.48
6 168 Kulesza, Jarek Laval, QC 10.57 10.53
7 333 Wood, Steven Mississauga, ON 10.66 10.57
8 109 Grenier, Martin Sherbrooke, QC 10.67 10.59
Guest
 

good race

Postby Guest » Sat Jul 19, 2003 8:54 pm

It was a good race, but Henry had a stumble out of the blocks. It could have turned out different. No excuse though.
Guest
 

Re: good race

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 20, 2003 12:16 am

Why do so many people hate Macro? He is very
talented & will go above & beyond what Shirvington
did.
Guest
 

Re: good race

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:35 am

I agree. I think he'll do twice as much as Shirvo. Of course, two times nothing is still nothing.
Guest
 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gktrack and 13 guests